Argumentation

1382 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

September 2002

  1. Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1019993002329

June 2002

  1. How to Distinguish Good and Bad Arguments: Dialogico-Rhetorical Normativity
    doi:10.1023/a:1015589400146
  2. Hilary Putnam's Dialectical Thinking: An Application to Fallacy Theory
    doi:10.1023/a:1015526710248
  3. Bibliography Argumentation Studies 2000
    doi:10.1023/a:1015537512771
  4. Bondi, Marina (1998, Ed.). Forms of Argumentative Discourse. Per un'analisi linguistica dell'argomentare
    doi:10.1023/a:1015546708502
  5. D.N. Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority
    doi:10.1023/a:1015565728806
  6. Fisher, Alec and Scriven, Michael (1997). Critical Thinking. Its Definition and Assessment
    doi:10.1023/a:1015597228975
  7. Reasons to Buy: The Logic of Advertisements
    doi:10.1023/a:1015512825071
  8. The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory: The Standard Definition of 'Fallacy'
    doi:10.1023/a:1015509401631
  9. Kienpointner, Manfred (1996). Vernünftig argumentieren. Regeln und Techniken der Diskussion [Reasonable argumentation. Rules and techniques of discussion]
    doi:10.1023/a:1015522403377

March 2002

  1. Argumentation and Transformation
    doi:10.1023/a:1014914924724
  2. Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1014991300192
  3. Reasoning Together: Temptations, Dangers, and Cautions
    doi:10.1023/a:1014958422056
  4. Reasoning and Explaining
    doi:10.1023/a:1014940822482
  5. Legal Practices and the Reason of the Law
    doi:10.1023/a:1014952008795
  6. Editor's Introduction
    doi:10.1023/a:1014928514788
  7. Speaking Your Mind: Large Inarticulateness Constitutional and Circumstantial
    doi:10.1023/a:1014929916547
  8. The Limits of Explication
    doi:10.1023/a:1014917625208

November 2001

  1. Contents of Volume 15
    doi:10.1023/a:1017361030099
  2. Walton, Douglas (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments
    doi:10.1023/a:1012252322407
  3. Anecdotal, Statistical, and Causal Evidence: Their Perceived and Actual Persuasiveness
    doi:10.1023/a:1012075630523
  4. Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective
    doi:10.1023/a:1012022330148
  5. Barbara Emmel, Paula Resch, and Deborah Tenney (eds.), Argument Revisited; Argument Redefined
    doi:10.1023/a:1012285520375
  6. Preconditions for Normative Argumentation in a Pluralist World
    doi:10.1023/a:1012051404009
  7. The Normative Structure of Adjudicative Dialogue
    doi:10.1023/a:1012089915599
  8. Fantasy Themes and Rhetorical Visions in the Brent Spar Crisis: A Comparative Analysis of German and French Newspaper Coverage
    doi:10.1023/a:1012037914218
  9. The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas vs Johnson
    doi:10.1023/a:1012282916984
  10. The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions
    doi:10.1023/a:1012023601906
  11. Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development
    doi:10.1023/a:1012021017836

August 2001

  1. Emotional Messages
    doi:10.1023/a:1011156918137
  2. Pragma-dialectical Theory and Interpersonal Interaction Outcomes: Unproductive Interpersonal Behavior as Violations of Rules for Critical Discussion
    doi:10.1023/a:1011117411938
  3. Moral and Logical Perspectives on Appealing to Pity
    doi:10.1023/a:1011171200997
  4. Bibliography Argumentation Studies 1999
    doi:10.1023/a:1011140404841
  5. Expert Advice and Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Work of Douglas Walton
    doi:10.1023/a:1011171711029
  6. Poulakos, Takis (1997), Speaking for the Polis. Isocrates' Rhetorical Education
    doi:10.1023/a:1011111904253
  7. Quintilian and the Pedagogy of Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1011165327867
  8. The Cardinal Principles of the National Entity of Japan: A Rhetoric of Ideological Pronouncement
    doi:10.1023/a:1011128317115
  9. Wilson on Circular Arguments
    doi:10.1023/a:1011199431056

May 2001

  1. Public Argument and Civil Society: The Cold War Legacy as a Barrier to Deliberative Politics
    doi:10.1023/a:1011157308893
  2. Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999)
    doi:10.1023/a:1011157310039
  3. Emergent vs. Dogmatic Arguing
    doi:10.1023/a:1011107517229
  4. Searching for the Roots of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem
    doi:10.1023/a:1011120100277
  5. Teaching by Convincing: Strategies of Argumentation in Lectures
    doi:10.1023/a:1011161331228
  6. A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of the Inquisition
    doi:10.1023/a:1011104901299
  7. Ralph H. Johnson (2000), Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1011111203624
  8. `Theoretical' and `Empirical' Reasoning Modes from the Neurological Perspective
    doi:10.1023/a:1011117124922
  9. Phenomenological Argumentative Structure
    doi:10.1023/a:1011180401186

January 2001

  1. A New Framework for Teaching Scientific Reasoning
    doi:10.1023/a:1007880010975
  2. Justification, Discovery, Reason & Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1007800732356
  3. Teaching Subtlety of Thought: The Lessons of `Contextualism'
    doi:10.1023/a:1007858709158