Argumentation

1382 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

January 2001

  1. Is Logic the Key to All Good Reasoning?
    doi:10.1023/a:1007808902314
  2. The New Philosophy of Science and Its Lessons
    doi:10.1023/a:1007840429630
  3. Science and Teaching Reasoning
    doi:10.1023/a:1007838529108
  4. It Isn't The Thought That Counts
    doi:10.1023/a:1007817220061
  5. Classification in Mathematics and Biology: Some Recent Trends
    doi:10.1023/a:1007886913178

November 2000

  1. 'I'm Just Saying . . .': Discourse Markers of Standpoint Continuity
    doi:10.1023/a:1007880826834
  2. Ruth Amossy et Michel Delon (eds.), Critique et légitimité du préjugé (XVIIIe–XXe siècle). Collection de philosophie politique et juridique
    doi:10.1023/a:1007875611102
  3. The Organization of Justificatory Discourse in Interaction: A Comparison Within and Across Cultures
    doi:10.1023/a:1007832910904
  4. Cattani, Adelino (1995). Discorsi Ingannevoli: argomenti per difendersi, attaccare, divertisrsi. Padova: Edizioni GB, 208 pp.
    doi:10.1023/a:1007882823509
  5. Reductionism in Fallacy Theory
    doi:10.1023/a:1007809709996
  6. Contents of Volume 14
    doi:10.1023/a:1017389028029
  7. State-of-the-Art: The Structure of Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1007800305762
  8. Argumentational Integrity: A Training Program for Dealing with Unfair Argumentative Contributions
    doi:10.1023/a:1007889322192
  9. Resisting Explanation
    doi:10.1023/a:1007897325732

August 2000

  1. Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century'
    doi:10.1023/a:1007801029121
  2. Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'
    doi:10.1023/a:1007805130030
  3. Comments On `Analyzing Argumentative Discourse from a Rhetorical Perspective: Defining "Person" and "Human Life" in Constitutional Disputes Over Abortion'
    doi:10.1023/a:1007813331847
  4. Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives'
    doi:10.1023/a:1007896828212
  5. Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework
    doi:10.1023/a:1007857114100
  6. Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century
    doi:10.1023/a:1007848912283
  7. Comments on `Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework
    doi:10.1023/a:1007809230938
  8. Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives
    doi:10.1023/a:1007844811374
  9. Introduction
    doi:10.1023/a:1007891809557
  10. In Memoriam Rob Grootendorst (1944–2000)
    doi:10.1023/a:1007836827401
  11. Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics
    doi:10.1023/a:1007853013191
  12. Comments on `Meeting in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and Dialectic'
    doi:10.1023/a:1007840727304
  13. Analyzing Argumentative Discourse from a Rhetorical Perspective: Defining `Person' and `Human Life' in Constitutional Disputes Over Abortion
    doi:10.1023/a:1007861215009
  14. Meeting in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and Dialectic
    doi:10.1023/a:1007888626395

May 2000

  1. From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’ in Moral Epistemology
    doi:10.1023/a:1007861512274
  2. Bibliography Argumentation Studies 1998
    doi:10.1023/a:1007830430218
  3. File of Fallacies: Alfred Sidgwick: A Little-Known Precursor of Informal Logic and Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1007893406262
  4. What Types of Statements are There?
    doi:10.1023/a:1007846431353
  5. A. Lodder (1990), On Legal Justification and Dialog Games. Maastricht: Dissertation University of Maastricht.
    doi:10.1023/a:1007826301726
  6. Slippery Slopes and Collapsing Taboos
    doi:10.1023/a:1007837321284
  7. On the Concept, Function, Scope, and Evaluation of Justification(s)
    doi:10.1023/a:1007893504445

February 2000

  1. Douglas Walton (1995) Arguments from Ignorance
    doi:10.1023/a:1007835706813
  2. Janet M. Atwill, Rhetoric Reclaimed: Aristotle and The Liberal Arts Tradition
    doi:10.1023/a:1007839710985
  3. Semantic Shifts in Argumentative Processes: A Step Beyond the ‘Fallacy of Equivocation’
    doi:10.1023/a:1007838727096
  4. Robert H. Ennis (1996), Critical Thinking
    doi:10.1023/a:1007850227823
  5. Antoine Arnauld (1612--1694)
    doi:10.1023/a:1007786123170
  6. Elisa Bussi, Marina Bondi and Francesca Gatta (eds.) (1995), Understanding Argument. La logica informale del discorso
    doi:10.1023/a:1007861309410
  7. Marcello Pera (1994), The Discourses of Science (translated by Clarissa Botsford)
    doi:10.1023/a:1007857208501
  8. Henry Prakken (1997), Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
    doi:10.1023/a:1007868007593
  9. The Influence of Argumentative Role (Initiator vs. Resistor) on Perceptions of Serial Argument Resolvability and Relational Harm
    doi:10.1023/a:1007837310258

November 1999

  1. Tarla Rai Peterson, Sharing the Earth: the Rhetoric of Sustainable Development, University of South Carolina Press
    doi:10.1023/a:1007816209726
  2. The Appeal to Ignorance, or Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam
    doi:10.1023/a:1007780012323
  3. Francis Bacon: Human Biasand the Four Idols
    doi:10.1023/a:1007761324269
  4. Angustus DeMorgan (1806--1871)
    doi:10.1023/a:1007795822261
  5. Richard Starmans (1996), Logic, Argument, and Commonsence. Tilburg: Tilburg University Print.
    doi:10.1023/a:1007894729039
  6. The Fallacy of Many Questions: On the Notions of Complexity, Loadedness and Unfair Entrapment in Interrogative Theory
    doi:10.1023/a:1007727929716