Argumentation

1382 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

November 1999

  1. Peter Ramus
    doi:10.1023/a:1007758523742
  2. Argument from Consequences and the Urge to Polarize
    doi:10.1023/a:1007815429173

August 1999

  1. Jean-Blaise Grize (1996). Logique naturelle & communications
    doi:10.1023/a:1007881502068
  2. The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic
    doi:10.1023/a:1007789101256
  3. Simplement, as a Metalinguistic Operator
    doi:10.1023/a:1007819813261
  4. Maurice Finocchiaro (1997). Galileo on the World Systems: A New Abridged Translation and Guide
    doi:10.1023/a:1007777811696
  5. Justifying My Position in Your Terms: Cross-cultural Argumentation in a Globalized World
    doi:10.1023/a:1007866519621
  6. Reasonable Doubt: A Note on ‘Neutral’ Illatives and Arguments
    doi:10.1023/a:1007814530099
  7. D. N. Walton, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
    doi:10.1023/a:1007806318906
  8. Historical Origins of Argumentum ad Consequentiam
    doi:10.1023/a:1007779527544
  9. John Stuart Mill (1806--1873)
    doi:10.1023/a:1007734006332

May 1999

  1. Argument Quality and Cultural Difference
    doi:10.1023/a:1026466310894
  2. Steep Cliff Arguments
    doi:10.1023/a:1026490224078
  3. Aristotle (384--322 B.C.)
    doi:10.1023/a:1007784014695
  4. Rethinking the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization
    doi:10.1023/a:1026497207240
  5. Regulating Disagreement, Constituting Participants: A Critique of Proceduralist Theories of Democracy
    doi:10.1023/a:1007773607213
  6. Bibliography Argumentation Studies 1997
    doi:10.1023/a:1026401323218
  7. Molly Meijer Wertheimer (eds.),Listening to Their Voices: The Rhetorical Activities of Historical Women (1997).
    doi:10.1023/a:1026439331002
  8. Taylor, C. A. (1996), Defining Science. A Rhetoric of Demarcation.
    doi:10.1023/a:1026417609986
  9. Leo A. Groarke, Christopher W. Tindale, and Linda Fisher, Good Reasoning Matters! A constructive approach to critical thinking (1997).
    doi:10.1023/a:1026451913814

February 1999

  1. Argumentation as Rule-Justified Claims: Elements of a Conceptual Framework for the Critical Analysis of Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1007703608951
  2. Walton, Douglas (ed.), Fallacies Arising from Ambiguity (1996)
    doi:10.1023/a:1007767608283
  3. The Construction of Issues: Pleading Theory and Practice, Relevance in Pragmatics, and the Confrontation Stage in the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1007742425789
  4. Affirming a Straw Man: A Reply to Bowles
    doi:10.1023/a:1007737330129
  5. Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics
    doi:10.1023/a:1007771101651
  6. The Revelation Argument. A 'Communicational Fallacy'
    doi:10.1023/a:1007770527609
  7. James A. Herrick, The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680–1750
    doi:10.1023/a:1007792927396
  8. Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance
    doi:10.1023/a:1007738812877
  9. Argumentative Text as Rhetorical Structure: An Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory
    doi:10.1023/a:1007794409860
  10. Nyan, Thanh (1998). Metalinguistic Operators. With Reference to French
    doi:10.1023/a:1007702326824

November 1998

  1. The Normative, the Proper, and the Sublime: Notes on the Use of Figure and Emotion in Prophetic Argument
    doi:10.1023/a:1007734830808
  2. Marianne, Doury, Le débat immobile. L'argumentation dans le débat médiatique sur les parasciences
    doi:10.1023/a:1007715807431
  3. Just How Correct is Political Correctness? A Critique of the Opposition's Arguments
    doi:10.1023/a:1007718113969
  4. Contents of Volume 12
    doi:10.1023/a:1017133917433
  5. Public Debate – An Act of Hostility?
    doi:10.1023/a:1007735127171
  6. Argumentum ad baculum
    doi:10.1023/a:1007779930624
  7. Johan van Benthem, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Frank Veltman (eds.), Logic and Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1007716828252
  8. Alban Bouvier, L'argumentation philosophique. Étude de sociologie cognitive
    doi:10.1023/a:1007767316361

August 1998

  1. A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes
    doi:10.1023/a:1007791211241
  2. Michael A. Gilbert, Coalescent Argumentation
    doi:10.1023/a:1007704113201
  3. D. N. Walton, Argument structure, A Pragmatic Theory
    doi:10.1023/a:1007795828223
  4. Don Paul Abbott, Rhetoric in the New World. Rhetorical Theory and Practice in Colonial Spanish America
    doi:10.1023/a:1007746827314
  5. Influence Opportunities and the Development of Argumentation Competencies in Childhood
    doi:10.1023/a:1007780507894
  6. Bibliography Argumentation Studies 1996
    doi:10.1023/a:1007734315280
  7. Evaluations of Rebuttal Analogy Users: Ethical and Competence Considerations
    doi:10.1023/a:1007783009424
  8. Points of View
    doi:10.1023/a:1007770813424

May 1998

  1. Who is Afraid of Figure of Speech?
    doi:10.1023/a:1007760218196
  2. Facework and Rhetorical Strategies in Intercultural Argumentative Discourse
    doi:10.1023/a:1007739713653
  3. Introduction
    doi:10.1023/a:1007743511836
  4. Rhetoric and the Unconscious
    doi:10.1023/a:1007795814561