Cited by in this index (2)

1. Metcalf (2005)
   Rethinking the Ad Hominem: A Case Study of Chomsky
   Argumentation
2. Walton (2004)
   Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem A…
   Argumentation

Cites in this index (8)

1. Blair (1998)
   The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument
   Argumentation
2. Johnstone (1996)
   Locke and Whately on the Argumentum ad Hominem
   Argumentation
3. Lagerspetz (1995)
   Ad hominem arguments in practical argumentation
   Argumentation
4. Eemeren et al. (1992)
   Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem
   Argumentation
5. Eemeren et al. (1987)
   Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective
   Argumentation

Show all 8 →

1. Blair et al. (1987)
   Argumentation as dialectical
   Argumentation
2. Hintikka (1987)
   The fallacy of fallacies
   Argumentation
3. Walton (1987)
   The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy
   Argumentation

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓

1. Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, translated by E.S. Forster, Page, T.E. (ed.), The loeb Classical Libra…
    ↗
2. Aristotle, Topics, Books I And VIII, transl. with a commentary by Robin Smith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.
    ↗
3. F. v. Eemeren (1984)
   Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussion. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussi…
    ↗
4. F. v. Eemeren (1993)
   Empirical Logic and Public Debate
    ↗
5. J. Hintikka (1997)
   Hintikka, J.: 1997, ‘What was Aristotle doing in His Early Logic, Anyway? A Reply to Woods and Hansen’, Synth…
   Synthese  ↗
6. G. Nuchelmans (1993)
   Empirical Logic and Public Debate
    ↗
7. D. Walton (1996)
   Fallacies Arising From Ambiguity
    ↗
8. J. Woods (1997)
   Woods, J. and H. Hansen: 1997, ‘Hintikka on Aristotle's Fallacies’, Synthese 113, 217–239.
   Synthese  ↗