Argumentation Sep 2002 Open Access

The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument

Graciela Marta Chichi Universidad Nacional de La Plata
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2002-09-01
DOI
10.1023/a:1019967112062
CompPile
Open Access
Green
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Braet (2007)
    The Oldest Extant Rhetorical Contribution to the Study of Fallacies (Cicero On …
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Metcalf (2005)
    Rethinking the Ad Hominem: A Case Study of Chomsky
    Argumentation
  3. Walton (2004)
    Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem A…
    Argumentation

References (44) · 8 in this index

  1. Abagnano, N.: 1963, Diccionario de Filosofía, Buenos Aires-México, Fondo de Cultura Econó mica, first ed. 1961.
  2. Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in Aristotelis Topicorum Libros octo Commentaria, edit. M. Wallies, Commentaria in A…
  3. Alexandri quod fertur in Aristotelis Sophisticos Elenchos Commentarium. edit. M. Wallies, CAG, Consilio et au…
  4. Aristó teles, Organon, Traducido por M. Candel San Martín, Madrid, Gredos, 1982; vol. I.
  5. Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, translated by E.S. Forster, Page, T.E. (ed.), The loeb Classical Libra…
     ↗
Show all 44 →
  1. Aristotle, Topics, Books I And VIII, transl. with a commentary by Robin Smith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.
     ↗
  2. (1986)
    J. Bentham, Tratado de los sofismas políticos
  3. (1957)
    Enciclopedia Filosofica
  4. Blair (1998)
    The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument
    Argumentation
  5. Blair et al. (1987)
    Argumentation as dialectical
    Argumentation
  6. Chichi, G.M.: 1996, La técnica de discusió n en Los Tó picos de Aristó teles (343 pgs., unedited mss., Ph.D. …
  7. I. Copi (1974)
    Introducció n a la ló gica
  8. I. Düring (1966)
    Aristoteles und sein Denken
  9. S. Ebbessen (1981)
    Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle's Sophisticis Elenchis
  10. P. Edwards (1967)
    The Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  11. F. v. Eemeren (1984)
    Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussion. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussi…
     ↗
  12. Eemeren et al. (1987)
    Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective
    Argumentation
  13. Eemeren et al. (1992)
    Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem
    Argumentation
  14. F. v. Eemeren (1993)
    Empirical Logic and Public Debate
     ↗
  15. F. Ferrater Mora (1984)
    Diccionario de Filosofía
  16. H. Flashar (1983)
    Ñberweg, Grundiss der Geschichte der Philosophie
  17. N. Green-Pedersen (1984)
    The Tradition of The Topics in the Midle Ages
  18. Hamblin, C.L.: 1998, Fallacies, Newport News, Vale Press, first ed., 1970.
  19. H.V. Hansen (1996)
    Hansen, H.V.: 1996, ‘Whately on the Ad Hominem: A Liberal Exegesis’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 29(4), 400–415.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  20. Hintikka (1987)
    The fallacy of fallacies
    Argumentation
  21. J. Hintikka (1993)
    Hintikka, J.: 1993, ‘Socratic Questioning, Logic And Rhetoric’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 1 184, 5–30.
    Revue Internationale de Philosophie
  22. J. Hintikka (1997)
    Hintikka, J.: 1997, ‘What was Aristotle doing in His Early Logic, Anyway? A Reply to Woods and Hansen’, Synth…
    Synthese  ↗
  23. (1990)
    Encyclopédie philosophique Universelle. Les notions philosophiques
  24. Johnstone (1996)
    Locke and Whately on the Argumentum ad Hominem
    Argumentation
  25. M.L. Kakkuri-Knuuttila (1989)
    Text - Interpretation-Argumentation
  26. Lagerspetz (1995)
    Ad hominem arguments in practical argumentation
    Argumentation
  27. A. Lalande (1953)
    Vocabulario técnico y crítico de filosofía
  28. G. Nuchelmans (1993)
    Empirical Logic and Public Debate
     ↗
  29. C. Perelman (1971)
    The New Rhetoric
  30. M. Scriven (1976)
    Reasoning
  31. Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy and Other Posthumous Papers, transl. By Bailey Saunders,London (S…
  32. Arthur Schopenhauer, Der handschriftliche Nachlass, edited by A. Hübscher, Frankfurt a.M., Waldemar Kramer; 1…
  33. Aus Arthur Schopenhauers Handschriftlichem Nachlass, edit. J. Frauenstädt, Leipzig, 1864, pp. 3–35.
  34. P. Slomkowski (1997)
    Aristotle's Topics
  35. Walton (1987)
    The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy
    Argumentation
  36. D. Walton (1995)
    A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy
  37. D. Walton (1996)
    Fallacies Arising From Ambiguity
     ↗
  38. J. Woods (1997)
    Woods, J. and H. Hansen: 1997, ‘Hintikka on Aristotle's Fallacies’, Synthese 113, 217–239.
    Synthese  ↗
  39. A. Zadro (1974)
    Aristotele, I Topici
CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network → Build reading path →