Argumentation Jan 1987

The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy

Douglas N. Walton
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1987-01-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00136781
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Kraus (2007)
    From Figure to Argument: Contrarium in Roman Rhetoric
    Argumentation
  2. Laar (2007)
    Pragmatic Inconsistency and Credibility
    Argumentation
  3. Metcalf (2005)
    Rethinking the Ad Hominem: A Case Study of Chomsky
    Argumentation
  4. Chichi (2002)
    The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
    Argumentation

References (13)

  1. E. M. Barth (1982)
    From Axiom to Dialogue
     ↗
  2. Barth, E. M. and J. L. Martens: 1977, ?Argumentum Ad Hominem: From Chaos to Formal Dialectic?, Logique et Ana…
  3. Alan Brinton (1985)
    Brinton, Alan: 1985, ?A Rhetorical View of the Ad Hominem? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63, 50?63.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  4. A. DeMorgan (1847)
    Formal Logic
  5. T. Govier (1983)
    Govier, T.: 1983, ?Ad Hominem: Revising the Textbooks?, Teaching Philosophy 6, 13?24.
    Teaching Philosophy  ↗
Show all 13 →
  1. C. L. Hamblin (1970)
    Fallacies
  2. Lawrence M. Hinman (1982)
    Hinman, Lawrence M.,: 1982, ?The Case for Ad Hominem Arguments?, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60, 338?345.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  3. G. E. Hughes (1958)
    Essays in Moral Philosophy
  4. H. W. Johnstone Jr. (1978)
    Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument
  5. D. Walton (1984)
    Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies
  6. D. Walton (1985)
    Arguer's Position
  7. R. Whately (1836)
    Elements of Logic
  8. J. Woods (1977)
    Woods, J. and D. Walton: 1977, ?Ad Hominem?, The Philosophical Forum 8, 1?20.
    The Philosophical Forum
CrossRef global citation count: 25 View in citation network → Build reading path →