Pragmatic Inconsistency and Credibility

Jan Albert van Laar University of Groningen
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2007-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-007-9049-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. From Axiom to Dialogue : A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation
  2. Brinton A. 1985 A Rhetorical View of the Ad Hominem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 63, 50–63
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  
  3. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 1999a, ‹Rhetoric in Pragma-Dialectics’, Argumentation, interpretation, …
  4. Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis
  5. Krabbe, E. C. W.: 2003, ‹Metadialogues’, in F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard and A. F. Snoeck He…
  6. Laar, J. A. van 2007 One-Sided Arguments. Synthese 154, 307–327
    Synthese  
  7. Pornpitakpan C. 2004 The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades’ Evidence. J…
    Journal of Applied Social Psychology  
  8. Walton D. N. 1999 Ethotic Arguments and Fallacies: The Credibility Function in Multi-Agent Dialogue Systems. …
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  9. The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning
  10. Fallacies: Selected Papers