Argumentation May 1988

Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective

Frans H. Van Eemeren ; Rob Grootendorst University of Amsterdam
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1988-05-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00178026
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (15)

  1. Svačinová (2019)
    The Thesis of the Effectiveness of Quasi-logical Arguments
    Argumentation
  2. Gascón (2017)
    Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics
    Argumentation
  3. Lewiński et al. (2014)
    Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry
    Argumentation
  4. Eemeren et al. (2012)
    Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Ef…
    Argumentation
  5. Lumer (2010)
    Pragma-Dialectics and the Function of Argumentation
    Argumentation
Show all 15 →
  1. Laar (2007)
    Pragmatic Inconsistency and Credibility
    Argumentation
  2. Eemeren et al. (2007)
    Kinship: The Relationship Between Johnstone's Ideas about Philosophical Argumen…
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Bertea (2005)
    Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?
    Argumentation
  4. Bertea (2004)
    Certainty, Reasonableness and Argumentation in Law
    Argumentation
  5. Bertea (2004)
    Certainty, reasonableness and argumentation in law
    Argumentation
  6. Eemeren et al. (2003)
    The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation
    Argumentation
  7. TINDALE (1997)
    Fallacies, Blunders, and Dialogue Shifts: Walton‘s Contributions to the Fallacy…
    Argumentation
  8. Verbiest (1995)
    Woman and the gift of reason
    Argumentation
  9. Gilbert (1995)
    Coalescent argumentation
    Argumentation
  10. Eemeren et al. (1988)
    Rules for argumentation in dialogues
    Argumentation

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 59 View in citation network → Build reading path →