Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics

José Ángel Gascón National University of Distance Education
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2017-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-017-9423-0
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. Aberdein, A. 2014. In defence of virtue: The legitimacy of agent-based argument appraisal. Informal Logic 34 …
    Informal Logic  
  2. Intelligent virtue
  3. Bowell, T., and J. Kingsbury. 2013. Virtue and argument: Taking character into account. Informal Logic 33 (1)…
    Informal Logic  
  4. Cohen, D.H. 2013b. Virtue, in context. Informal Logic 33 (4): 471–485.
    Informal Logic  
  5. Correia, V. 2012. The ethics of argumentation. Informal Logic 32 (2): 222–241.
    Informal Logic  
  6. Garssen, B., and J.A. van Laar. 2010. A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges. Info…
    Informal Logic  
  7. Godden, D. 2016. On the priority of agent-based argumentative norms. Topoi 35 (2): 345–357.
    Topoi  
  8. The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education
  9. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  10. Kidd, I.J. 2016. Intellectual humility, confidence, and argumentation. Topoi 35 (2): 395–402.
    Topoi  
  11. Lord, C.G., L. Ross, and M.R. Lepper. 1979. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of pri…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  12. Nickerson, R.S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology…
    Review of General Psychology  
  13. Paglieri, F. 2015. Bogency and goodacies: On argument quality in virtue argumentation theory. Informal Logic …
    Informal Logic  
  14. Popa, E.O. 2016. Criticism without fundamental principles. Informal Logic 36 (2): 192–216.
    Informal Logic  
  15. Pronin, E. 2007. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (1):…
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences  
  16. Pronin, E. 2008. How we see ourselves and how we see others.Science 320 (5880): 1177–1180.
    Science  
  17. Pronin, E., T. Gilovich, and L. Ross. 2004. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of …
    Psychological Review  
  18. Roberts, R.C., and R. West. 2015. Natural epistemic defects and corrective virtues. Synthese 192 (8): 2557–2576.
    Synthese  
  19. Tindale, C.W. 1996. Fallacies in transition: An assessment of the pragma- dialectical perspective. Informal L…
    Informal Logic  
  20. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse
  21. Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse
  22. Speech acts in argumentative discussions
  23. van Eemeren, F.H., B. Meuffels, and M. Verburg. 2000. The (un)reasonableness of ad hominem fallacies. Journal…
    Journal of Language and Social Psychology