Philosophy & Rhetoric Dec 2024

Intellectual Grandstanding: An Epistemic Bad in Argument

Lucy Alsip Vollbrecht Washington University in St. Louis

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a growing body of literature on virtue signaling or moral grandstanding, but relatively little has been said about virtue signaling’s cousin, intellect signaling or intellectual grandstanding. This article develops a working definition of intellectual grandstanding as it occurs in argumentative contexts. With this definition in hand, this article argues that intellectual grandstanding impedes epistemic success in argument on each major model of argument today. Intellectual grandstanding in argument fails to respect other arguers, it sustains disagreements, and it produces little reliable epistemic justification. Given this convergence of reasons, the article concludes that intellectual grandstanding poses a serious epistemic problem for argumentative exchange and deserves our immediate attention.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.4.0390
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (26) · 6 in this index

  1. Aberdein (2010)
    Virtue in Argument
    Argumentation
  2. (2016)
    “The Vices of Argument.”
    Topoi
  3. (2015)
    “Straw Men, Iron Men, and Argumentative Virtue.”
    Topoi
  4. Aikin et al. (2008)
    Modus Tonens
    Argumentation
  5. Coady, C. A. J., JustinTosi, and BrandonWarmke. 2017. “Philosophy & Public Affairs Discussion at PEA Soup: Ju…
Show all 26 →
  1. (2005)
    The Uses of Argument
  2. (2007)
  3. Dr. Glaucomflecken [@drglaucomflecken]. 2021. “The Audience at an Academic Meeting.” TikTok, 17July. https://…
  4. (2016)
    “Virtue and Arguers.”
    Topoi  ↗
  5. Gascón (2017)
    Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics
    Argumentation
  6. Gascón (2018)
    Virtuous Arguers: Responsible and Reliable
    Argumentation
  7. (2021)
    “Virtue Signaling Is Virtuous.”
    Synthese  ↗
  8. (2005)
    “Introduction: The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation—A Map.”
    Informal Logic
  9. (1969)
    The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
  10. (2007)
    Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology
  11. (2016)
    “The Virtuous Arguer: One Person, Four Roles.”
    Topoi  ↗
  12. (2023)
    “Intellectual Arrogance: Individual, Group-Based, and Corporate.”
    Synthese
  13. Thimsen (2022)
    What Is Performative Activism?
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  14. (1999)
    Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument
  15. (2016)
    “Moral Grandstanding.”
    Philosophy & Public Affairs  ↗
  16. (2020)
    Grandstanding: The Use and Abuse of Moral Talk
  17. (2004)
    A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
  18. (1999)
    “Strategic Manoeuvering in Argumentative Discourse.”
    Discourse Studies  ↗
  19. (2002)
    Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis
  20. Eemeren et al. (2006)
    Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation
    Argumentation
  21. (2021)
    “Reflections on Intellectual Grandstanding.”
    Southwest Philosophy Review  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →