Virtuous Arguers: Responsible and Reliable

José Ángel Gascón National University of Distance Education
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2018-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-018-9454-1
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. Aberdein, A. 2014. In defence of virtue: The legitimacy of agent-based argument appraisal. Informal Logic 34(…
    Informal Logic  
  2. Battaly, H. 2008. Virtue epistemology. Philosophy Compass 3(4): 639–663.
    Philosophy Compass  
  3. Bowell, T., and J. Kingsbury. 2013. Virtue and argument: Taking character into account. Informal Logic 33(1):…
    Informal Logic  
  4. Code, L. 1984. Toward a “responsibilist” epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45(1): 29–50.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  5. Correia, V. 2017. Accountability breeds response-ability: Contextual debiasing and accountability in argument…
  6. Godden, D. 2016. On the priority of agent-based argumentative norms. Topoi 35(2): 345–357.
    Topoi  
  7. Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology
  8. Kunda, Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–498.
    Psychological Bulletin  
  9. The enigma of reason
  10. Paglieri, F. 2015. Bogency and goodacies: On argument quality in virtue argumentation theory. Informal Logic …
    Informal Logic  
  11. Intellectual virtues: An essay in regulative epistemology
  12. Sosa, E. 1980. The raft and the pyramid: Coherence versus foundations in the theory of knowledge. Midwest Stu…
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy  
  13. Knowledge in perspective: Selected essays in epistemology
  14. Apt belief and reflective knowledge: A virtue epistemology
  15. Virtues of the mind