Argumentation Jun 2023 Open Access

The Fallacy Fallacy: From the Owl of Minerva to the Lark of Arete

Andrew Aberdein Florida Institute of Technology
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09595-9
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Godden (2022)
    Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem
    Argumentation
  2. Gascón (2018)
    Virtuous Arguers: Responsible and Reliable
    Argumentation
  3. Aberdein (2010)
    Virtue in Argument
    Argumentation
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. Andrew Aberdein (2014)
    Aberdein, Andrew. 2014. In defence of virtue: The legitimacy of agent-based argument appraisal. Informal Logi…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  2. Andrew Aberdein (2016)
    Aberdein, Andrew. 2016b. The vices of argument. Topoi 35(2): 413–422.
    Topoi  ↗
  3. Andrew Aberdein (2020)
    The Routledge handbook of philosophy of humility
     ↗
  4. Andrew Aberdein (2021)
    Essays on argumentation in antiquity
     ↗
  5. Scott F Aikin (2020)
    Aikin, Scott F. 2020. The Owl of Minerva problem. Southwestern Philosophical Review 36(1): 13–22.
    Southwestern Philosophical Review  ↗
  6. Alfred Archer (2018)
    Archer, Alfred. 2018. The problem with moralism. Ratio 31(3): 342–350.
    Ratio  ↗
  7. Agnes Callard (2016)
    Callard, Agnes. 2016. Proleptic reasons. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 11: 129–154.
    Oxford Studies in Metaethics  ↗
  8. Quassim Cassam (2016)
    Cassam, Quassim. 2016. Vice epistemology. The Monist 99(2): 159–180.
    The Monist  ↗
  9. Quassim Cassam (2021)
    Cassam, Quassim. 2021. Misunderstanding vaccine hesitancy: A case study in epistemic injustice. Educational P…
    Educational Philosophy and Theory  ↗
  10. Gilbert Harman (1999)
    Harman, Gilbert. 1999. Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attributio…
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  ↗
  11. Brian Hedden (2019)
    Hedden, Brian. 2019. Hindsight bias is not a bias. Analysis 79(1): 43–52.
    Analysis  ↗
  12. Tempest Henning (2021)
    Henning, Tempest. 2021. I said what I said—Black women and argumentative politeness norms. Informal Logic 41(…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  13. Shanto Iyengar (2015)
    Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. 2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group pola…
    American Journal of Political Science  ↗
  14. Hrishikesh Joshi (2020)
    Joshi, Hrishikesh. 2020. What are the chances you’re right about everything? An epistemic challenge for moder…
    Politics, Philosophy & Economics  ↗
  15. Ian James Kidd (2016)
    Kidd, Ian James. 2016. Charging others with epistemic vice. The Monist 99(2): 181–197.
    The Monist  ↗
  16. Ward Parks (1986)
    Parks, Ward. 1986. Flyting, sounding, debate: Three verbal contest genres. Poetics Today 7(3): 439–458.
    Poetics Today  ↗
  17. Lee Ross (1977)
    Ross, Lee. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Adv…
    Advances in Experimental Social Psychology  ↗
  18. Katharina Stevens (2021)
    Stevens, Katharina, and Daniel H. Cohen. 2021. Angelic Devil’s advocates and the forms of adversariality. Top…
    Topoi  ↗
  19. Justin Tosi (2020)
    Grandstanding: The use and abuse of moral talk
     ↗
  20. Jonathan Webber (2006)
    Webber, Jonathan. 2006. Virtue, character and situation. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3(2): 193–213.
    Journal of Moral Philosophy  ↗
  21. John Woods (2007)
    Woods, John. 2007. Lightening up on the ad hominem. Informal Logic 27(1): 109–134.
    Informal Logic  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →