Journal
Argumentation
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09595-9
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (40) · 3 in this index

  1. Argumentation
  2. Aberdein, Andrew. 2014. In defence of virtue: The legitimacy of agent-based argument appraisal. Informal Logi…
    Informal Logic  
  3. Aberdein, Andrew. 2016a. Arguments with losers. Florida Philosophical Review 16(1): 1–11.
    Florida Philosophical Review
  4. Aberdein, Andrew. 2016b. The vices of argument. Topoi 35(2): 413–422.
    Topoi  
  5. Argumentation, objectivity and bias: Proceedings of the 11th international conference of …
Show all 40 →
  1. The Routledge handbook of philosophy of humility
  2. Essays on argumentation in antiquity
  3. Aikin, Scott F. 2020. The Owl of Minerva problem. Southwestern Philosophical Review 36(1): 13–22.
    Southwestern Philosophical Review  
  4. Aikin, Scott F., and Robert B. Talisse. 2020. Disagreement, polarization, and the flight of Minerva’s Owl: A …
    Argument
  5. Archer, Alfred. 2018. The problem with moralism. Ratio 31(3): 342–350.
    Ratio  
  6. Callard, Agnes. 2016. Proleptic reasons. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 11: 129–154.
    Oxford Studies in Metaethics  
  7. Cassam, Quassim. 2016. Vice epistemology. The Monist 99(2): 159–180.
    The Monist  
  8. Cassam, Quassim. 2021. Misunderstanding vaccine hesitancy: A case study in epistemic injustice. Educational P…
    Educational Philosophy and Theory  
  9. Proceedings of ISSA 2014: Eighth conference of the International Society for the Study of…
  10. Bad arguments: 100 of the most important fallacies in Western philosophy
  11. Attacking faulty reasoning: A practical guide to fallacy-free arguments
  12. Davies, Richard. 2015. Eristic dialectic: The fencing master’s judgment. Eris 1(1): 20–33.
    Eris
  13. Historians’ fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thought
  14. Argumentation
  15. Argumentation
  16. Harman, Gilbert. 1999. Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attributio…
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  17. Hedden, Brian. 2019. Hindsight bias is not a bias. Analysis 79(1): 43–52.
    Analysis  
  18. Henning, Tempest. 2021. I said what I said—Black women and argumentative politeness norms. Informal Logic 41(…
    Informal Logic  
  19. Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. 2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group pola…
    American Journal of Political Science  
  20. Joshi, Hrishikesh. 2020. What are the chances you’re right about everything? An epistemic challenge for moder…
    Politics, Philosophy & Economics  
  21. Kidd, Ian James. 2016. Charging others with epistemic vice. The Monist 99(2): 181–197.
    The Monist  
  22. Lemanski, Jens. 2021. Discourse ethics and eristic. The Polish Journal of Aesthetics 62: 151–162.
    The Polish Journal of Aesthetics
  23. Consciousness and experience
  24. Why brilliant people believe nonsense: A practical text for critical and creative thinking
  25. Parks, Ward. 1986. Flyting, sounding, debate: Three verbal contest genres. Poetics Today 7(3): 439–458.
    Poetics Today  
  26. Contemporary theories of knowledge
  27. Argumentation and rhetoric
  28. Ross, Lee. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Adv…
    Advances in Experimental Social Psychology  
  29. Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1896. The art of controversy and other posthumous papers. London: Swan Sonnenschein. Tr…
  30. Stevens, Katharina, and Daniel H. Cohen. 2021. Angelic Devil’s advocates and the forms of adversariality. Top…
    Topoi  
  31. Grandstanding: The use and abuse of moral talk
  32. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning
  33. Webber, Jonathan. 2006. Virtue, character and situation. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3(2): 193–213.
    Journal of Moral Philosophy  
  34. Crimes against logic
  35. Woods, John. 2007. Lightening up on the ad hominem. Informal Logic 27(1): 109–134.
    Informal Logic