Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem

David Godden Michigan State University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2022-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-021-09554-2
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric

References (30) · 2 in this index

  1. Argumentation
  2. Aikin, S. 2018. Deep disagreement and the problem of the criterion. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018…
  3. Aikin, S. 2019. Deep disagreement, the dark enlightenment, and the rhetoric of the red pill. Journal of Appli…
    Journal of Applied Philosophy  
  4. Aikin, S. 2020. The Owl of Minerva problem. Southwest Philosophical Review 36 (1): 13–22.
    Southwest Philosophical Review  
  5. Aikin, S. and Talisse, R. 2017a. Democracy, deliberation, and the Owl of Minerva problem: The malaise of argu…
Show all 30 →
  1. Aikin, S. and Talisse, R. 2017b. The Owl of Minerva problem. 3 Quarks Daily: Science, Arts, Philosophy, Polit…
  2. Aikin, S and Talisse, R. 2018. The Owl of Minerva and the fallacy fallacy. 3 Quarks Daily: Science, Arts, Phi…
  3. Why we argue (and how we should): A guide to political disagreement in an age of unreason
  4. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions
  5. Making it explicit
  6. Aspiration: The agency of becoming
  7. Campolo, C. 2019. On staying in character: Virtue and the possibility of deep disagreement. Topoi 38 (4): 719–723.
    Topoi  
  8. Godden, D. 2014. Teaching rational entitlement and responsibility: A Socratic exercise. Informal Logic 34 (1)…
    Informal Logic  
  9. Godden, D. (2019). On the rational resolvability of deep disagreement through meta-argumentation: A resource …
    Topoi  
  10. Godden, D. 2021 (forthcoming). The compliment of rational opposition: Disagreement, adversariality, and dispu…
  11. The social construction of what?
  12. Hardy, G.H. [1940] 2012. A mathematician’s apology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  13. Inglis, M., and A. Aberdein. 2015. Beauty is not simplicity: An analysis of mathematicians’ proof appraisals.…
    Philosophia Mathematica  
  14. Jackson, S. 2019. Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi 38 (4): 631–643.
    Topoi  
  15. Anyone Who Has a View
  16. Leite, A. 2004. On justifying and being justified. Philosophical Issues, Epistemology 14: 219–253.
    Philosophical Issues, Epistemology  
  17. Justice, gender and the family
  18. Sellars, W. [1956] 1997. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge. MA: Harvard UP.
  19. Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education
  20. Rationality redeemed: Further dialogues on an educational ideal
  21. Stevens, K. 2019. The roles we make others take: Thoughts on the ethics of arguing. Topoi 38 (4): 693–709.
    Topoi  
  22. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. [PI] Philosophical investigations, 3rd ed. G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.). New York: Macmillan.
  23. Wittgenstein, L. 1969. [OC] On certainty. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright (eds.). D. Paul and G.E.M. Ansc…
  24. Wright, L. 1995. Argument and deliberation: A plea for understanding. Journal of Philosophy 92: 565–585.
    Journal of Philosophy  
  25. Argumentation