Argumentation Sep 2025 Open Access

One Concept of Argument

Marcin Lewiński Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Abstract

Abstract Part of the business of argumentation theory involves resolving a conceptual dispute over what argumentation and argument are in the first place. This dispute has produced various “concepts of argument.” The goal of this paper is twofold: (1) to develop a complete ontology of argumentative phenomena, capable of accounting for various conceptions of argument—something, as I argue, that is badly wanting in argumentation theory; and, within this ontology, (2) to defend a position that there is but one concept of argument needed to grasp these diverse phenomena and conceptions of argument and argumentation. I move in four steps. First, I briefly sketch the discussion over arguments-as-activities and arguments-as-products. Second, I go back to the classic work of Twardowski on actions and products and adapt it for argumentation theory, producing a complex yet systematically organized conceptual ontology of argument and argumentation. This conceptual housekeeping allows me, third, to critically engage some of the recent, Frege-inspired philosophical literature on the concept of argument, while defending act-based approaches to argument(ation). Fourth, I present a positive proposal of a minimal, contrastivist concept of argument as a set of reasons advanced to support a conclusion C 1 rather than another conclusion C n .

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09654-3
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Zenker et al. (2024)
    Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
    Argumentation
  2. Svoboda (2020)
    On Defining ‘Argument’: Comments on Goodman
    Argumentation
  3. Goodman (2018)
    On Defining ‘Argument’
    Argumentation
  4. Gascón (2018)
    Virtuous Arguers: Responsible and Reliable
    Argumentation
  5. Mohammed (2016)
    Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Po…
    Argumentation
Show all 10 →
  1. Groarke (2015)
    Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter?
    Argumentation
  2. Aberdein (2010)
    Virtue in Argument
    Argumentation
  3. Siegel et al. (2008)
    Rationality, Reasonableness, and Critical Rationalism: Problems with the Pragma…
    Argumentation
  4. Blair (1998)
    The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument
    Argumentation
  5. Jacobs (1989)
    Speech acts and arguments
    Argumentation
Also cites 51 works outside this index ↓
  1. S Aikin (2021)
    Aikin, S. 2021. Argumentative adversariality, contrastive reasons, and the winners-and-losers problem. Topoi …
    Topoi  ↗
  2. Ajdukiewicz, K. 1974. Pragmatic Logic. Trans. by O. Wojtasiewicz. Synthese Library, Vol. 62. Dordrecht: Reidel.
     ↗
  3. L Bermejo-Luque (2011)
    Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory
     ↗
  4. Bobryk, J. 2009. The genesis and history of Twardowski’s theory of actions and products. In S. Lapointe, et a…
     ↗
  5. Boghossian, P. 2014. What is inference? Philosophical Studies, 169(1), 1–18.
     ↗
  6. Brandl., J. L. & Woleński, J. 1999. Introduction. In K. Twardowski, On Actions, Products, and Other Topics in…
     ↗
  7. Broome, J. (2013)
    Rationality through reasoning
     ↗
  8. LJ Buhagiar (2023)
    Buhagiar, L.J., and G. Sammut. 2023. The Minimal Model of Argumentation: Qualitative data analysis for episte…
    Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour  ↗
  9. DJ Chalmers (2011)
    Chalmers, D.J. 2011. Verbal disputes. Philosophical Review 120 (4): 515–556.
    Philosophical Review  ↗
  10. R Chang (2016)
    Weighing reasons
     ↗
  11. F Dretske (1970)
    Dretske, F. 1970. Epistemic operators. Journal of Philosophy 67 (24): 1007–1023.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  12. F Dretske (1972)
    Dretske, F. 1972. Contrastive statements. Philosophical Review 81 (4): 411–437.
    Philosophical Review  ↗
  13. PM Dung (1995)
    Dung, P.M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic …
    Artificial Intelligence  ↗
  14. FH van Eemeren (2014)
    Handbook of argumentation theory
     ↗
  15. FH van Eemeren (1984)
    Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
     ↗
  16. translated as 'On Sense and Reference' by M. Black in The Philosophical Review, 57(3), (1948), 209-230.
     ↗
  17. Frege, G. 1918/1956. Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung, in Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Ideal…
     ↗
  18. translated as 'The Thought: A Logical Inquiry' by A. M. Quinton & M. Quinton in Mind, 65(259), (1956), 289-311.
     ↗
  19. Gilbert, M.A. 1995. The delimitation of argument. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 15(1), 63–75.
     ↗
  20. GC Goddu (2011)
    Goddu, G.C. 2011a. Is ‘argument’ subject to the product/process ambiguity? Informal Logic 31 (2): 75–88.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  21. Goodwin, J. (2007)
    Goodwin, J. 2007. Argument has no function. Informal Logic 27 (1): 69–90.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  22. J Goodwin (2014)
    Goodwin, J. 2014. Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation: A case study of a d…
    Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric  ↗
  23. U Hahn (2024)
    Hahn, U. 2024. Individuals, collectives, and individuals in collectives: The ineliminable role of dependence.…
    Perspectives on Psychological Science  ↗
  24. Hanks, P. (2007)
    Hanks, P. 2007. The content–force distinction. Philosophical Studies 134 (2): 141–164.
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
  25. Hanks, P. (2015)
    Propositional content
     ↗
  26. A Haro Marchal (2023)
    Haro Marchal, A. 2023. Argumentation as a speech act: Two levels of analysis. Topoi 42 (2): 481–494.
    Topoi  ↗
  27. D Hitchcock (2007)
    Philosophy of Logic
     ↗
  28. T Hodgson (2021)
    Hodgson, T. 2021. Act-type theories of propositions. Philosophy Compass 16: e12788.
    Philosophy Compass  ↗
  29. S Jackson (2019)
    Jackson, S. 2019. Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi 38 (4): 631–643.
    Topoi  ↗
  30. S Jacobs (2024)
    Jacobs, S. 2024. Arguments and speech acts reconsidered. Topoi 43 (4): 1269–1286.
    Topoi  ↗
  31. S Jacobs (1981)
    Jacobs, S., and S. Jackson. 1981. Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversa…
    The Western Journal of Speech Communication  ↗
  32. Jubien, M. (2001)
    Jubien, M. 2001. Propositions and the objects of thought. Philosophical Studies 104 (1): 47–62.
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
  33. Labinaz, P. (2021)
    Labinaz, P. 2021. Argumentation as a speech act: A (provisional) balance. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 21 (…
    Croatian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  34. Lewiński. M. (2021)
    Lewiński. M. 2021. Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues. Informal Logic 41 (3): 421–451.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  35. E Margolis (2007)
    Margolis, E., and S. Laurence. 2007. The ontology of concepts—Abstract objects or mental representations? Noû…
    Noûs  ↗
  36. H Mercier (2011)
    Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  ↗
  37. F Moltmann (2013)
    Moltmann, F. 2013. Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products. Canad…
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  38. T Parsons (1996)
    Parsons, T. 1996. What is an argument? The Journal of Philosophy 93 (4): 164–185.
    The Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  39. Popper, K.R. 1968. Epistemology without a knowing subject. In B. Van Rootselaar & J.F. Staal (Eds.), Logic, M…
     ↗
  40. M van der Schaar (2006)
    Actions, Products and Things: Brentano and Polish Philosophy
     ↗
  41. J Schaffer (2004)
    Schaffer, J. 2004. From contextualism to contrastivism. Philosophical Studies 119 (1–2): 73–103.
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
  42. JR Searle (2010)
    Making the social world: The structure of human civilization
     ↗
  43. P Simard-Smith (2011)
    Simard-Smith, P., and A. Moldovan. 2011. Arguments as abstract objects. Informal Logic 31 (3): 230–261.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  44. W Sinnott-Armstrong (2008)
    Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2008. A contrastivist manifesto. Social Epistemology 22 (3): 257–270.
    Social Epistemology  ↗
  45. J Snedegar (2015)
    Snedegar, J. 2015. Contrastivism about reasons and ought. Philosophy Compass 10 (6): 379–388.
    Philosophy Compass  ↗
  46. Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2014)
    Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. 2014. Speech act theory and the study of argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and…
    Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric  ↗
  47. S Soames (2015)
    Rethinking language, mind, and meaning
     ↗
  48. LS Temkin (2012)
    Rethinking the good: Moral ideals and the nature of practical reasoning
     ↗
  49. CW Tindale (2015)
    The philosophy of argument and audience reception
     ↗
  50. Twardowski, K. 1999. Actions and products. Some remarks on the borderline of psychology, grammar, and logic. …
     ↗
  51. DN Walton (1990)
    Walton, D.N. 1990. What is reasoning? What is an argument? The Journal of Philosophy 87 (8): 399–419.
    The Journal of Philosophy  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  2. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗
    Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
    argument artificial intelligence
  3. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Apr 2026
    Psyche or Soma? ↗
    Samantha Rippetoe
    rhetorical criticism argument archival research
  4. Argumentation Mar 2026
    The Recursive Argument Structure Reconsidered ↗
    Shiyang Yu
    argument
  5. Argumentation Mar 2026
    Between Rationality and Self-protection: Student-Constructed Arguments on Fast Food Consumption and Antibiotic Overuse as Public Health Issues in Biology Education ↗
    Eliza Rybska; Michał Klichowski; Costas P. Constantinou; Barbara Jankowiak
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument qualitative research