Abstract

During the last decade, one source of debate in argumentation theory has been the notion that there are different modes of arguing that need to be distinguished when analyzing and evaluating arguments. Visual argument is often cited as a paradigm example. This paper discusses the ways in which it and modes of arguing that invoke non-verbal sounds, smells, tactile sensations, music and other non-verbal entities may be defined and conceptualized. Though some attempts to construct a ‘multimodal’ theory of argument are criticized, it advocates for an argumentation theory that makes room for visual arguing and for other non-verbal modes that have not been explored in depth. In the process, the paper provides a method for identifying the structure of multimodal arguments and argues that adding modes to our theoretical tool box is an important step toward a comprehensive account of argument.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2015-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Show all 10 →
  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation

References (36) · 2 in this index

  1. Argumentation
  2. Birdsell, David, and Leo Groarke. 2007. Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 4…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  3. Blair, J. Anthony. 1996. The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy 33(1):…
    Argumentation and Advocacy
  4. Carozza, Linda. 2007. Dissent in the midst of emotional territory. Informal Logic 27(2): 197–210.
    Informal Logic  
  5. Damaske, Jim. 1983. Legal briefs. POYi Archive (item #12884). http://archive.poyi.org/items/show/12884 . (Acc…
Show all 36 →
  1. Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials
  2. Topical themes in argumentation theory
  3. Whiskey and philosophy: A small batch of spirited ideas
  4. Dissensus and the search for common ground
  5. Duran, Claudio. 2010. Bi-logical analysis of arguments in political propaganda: The case of the Chilean Press…
  6. Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics
  7. Proceedings of the 7th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
  8. Gilbert, Michael A. 1994. Multi-modal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24(2): 159–177.
    Philosophy of the Social Sciences  
  9. Coalescent argumentation
  10. Argumentation
  11. Gilbert, Michael A. 2004. Emotion, argumentation & informal logic. Informal Logic 24(3): 245–264.
    Informal Logic
  12. Virtues of argument
  13. Groarke, Leo. 1996. Logic. Art and Argument. Informal Logic 18(2&3): 116–131.
    Art and Argument. Informal Logic
  14. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on argumentation
  15. Iedema, Rick. 2003. Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic pra…
    Visual Communication  
  16. Kjeldsen, Jens. 2007. Visual argumentation in Scandinavian political advertising. A cognitive, contextual and…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  17. Kišiček, Gabrijela. 2015. The role of paralinguistic features in the analysis of multimodal argumentation. In…
  18. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication
  19. Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
  20. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  21. Madrigal, Alexis. 2008. Mars phoenix tweets: “We have ICE!” Wired Magazine. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/mars…
  22. O’Keefe, Daniel J. 1977. Two concepts of argument. The Journal of American Forensic Association 13(Winter): 1…
    The Journal of American Forensic Association
  23. Argument, inference and dialectic: Collected papers on informal logic
  24. Roque, Georges. 2010. Expresiones y Modalidades del Futuro en la Imagen Fija. In El futuro: XXXI Coloquio int…
  25. Topical themes in argumentation theory
  26. The real thing: Doing philosophy with the media
  27. Smith, Michele, Leon G. Smith, and Benjamin Levinson. 1982. The use of smell in differential diagnosis. The L…
    The Lancet  
  28. Synnott, Anthony. 1991. A sociology of smell. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 28: 437.
    Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology  
  29. Virtues of argument
  30. van den Hoven, Paul. 2012. Getting your ad banned to bring the message home? A rhetorical analysis of an ad o…
    Informal Logic  
  31. Fallacies: Classical and contemporary readings