Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2007 Kinship: The Relationship Between Johnstone's Ideas about Philosophical Argument and the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Frans H. van Eemeren; Frans H. van Eemeren Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Peter Houtlosser Peter Houtlosser Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2007) 40 (1): 51–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/25655258 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser; Kinship: The Relationship Between Johnstone's Ideas about Philosophical Argument and the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2007; 40 (1): 51–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/25655258 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2007 The Pennsylvania State University2007The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2007-01-01
DOI
10.2307/25655258
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (22) · 3 in this index

  1. Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 1994. “La nature des topoi.” In La Theorie des Topo'i, ed. Jean-Claude Anscombre, 49-…
  2. Barth, Else M., and Erik C. W. Krabbe. 1982. From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argu…
  3. Barth, Else M., and Jo L. Martens. 1977. “Argumentum ad Hominem: From Chaos to Formal Dialectic. The Method o…
  4. Crawshay-Williams, Rupert. 1957. Methods and Criteria of Reasoning: An Inquiry into the Structure of Controve…
  5. Argumentation
Show all 22 →
  1. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Mo…
  2. Argumentation
  3. -. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  4. -. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cam- bridge: Cambridge UP.
  5. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing Argumentative …
  6. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser. 2002a. “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: A Deli…
  7. -. 2002b. “Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof.” In Advances in Pragma-Dia- lectics, ed. Frans H. …
  8. -. 2005. “Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Co…
  9. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2005. “Dialec- tische Profielen e…
  10. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bert Meuffels, and Mariel Verburg. 2000. “The (Un)reasonableness of the krgumentum ad …
  11. Hamblin, Charles L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.
  12. Johnstone, Henry W., Jr. 1965.“Persusasion and Validity in Philosophy.” In Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Argument…
  13. -. 1978. Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument: An Outlook on Transition. University Park, Pa.: The…
  14. Argumentation
  15. Walton, Douglas N. 1998. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: U of Toronto P.
  16. -. 2001. “Ad Hominem Argument.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, ed. Thomas A. Sloane, 1-7. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  17. Walton, Douglas N., and Erik C. W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reas…