Abstract

This article examines how Aristotelian rhetorical principles— ethos, pathos, and logos—can help manage social media outrage in complaint handling by translating them into defensive and accommodative response strategies commonly used in service recovery. Two online experiments evaluated four strategies for their effects on complainants’ moods: (a) blame-shifting; (b) promising action; (c) apologizing; and (d) a combination of empathy, apology, and promise. The results showed that accommodative strategies were more effective than defensive ones, with the combination of empathy, apology, and promise as the most effective. The findings suggest incorporating rhetorical training in business communication to enhance response efficacy.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2025-01-26
DOI
10.1177/23294906241308523
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 61 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1108/QMR-12-2021-0147
  2. 10.1080/02650487.2017.1349030
  3. 10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211003
  4. 10.1080/13683500.2018.1546675
  5. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100430
  6. 10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.007
  7. 10.1300/J057v12n03_13
  8. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
  9. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.04.001
  10. 10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2
  11. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100575
  12. 10.1108/JOSM-03-2014-0082
  13. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.026
  14. 10.1002/mar.20019
  15. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012
  16. 10.4337/9781802201963.00024
  17. 10.23860/diss-garca-ramrez-grisel-2016
  18. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.012
  19. 10.1108/09596111011066635
  20. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.022
  21. 10.1515/ip-2021-2003
  22. 10.1108/JCOM-11-2021-0132
  23. 10.1016/j.intmar.2020.02.002
  24. 10.1007/s11747-019-00661-x
  25. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.015
  26. 10.1007/978-3-658-10558-7_8
  27. 10.5840/beq201323216
  28. 10.1007/s10503-021-09564-0
  29. 10.1007/s12927-011-0004-8
  30. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
  31. 10.1177/1096348012451455
  32. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.009
  33. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.050
  34. 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.05.008
  35. 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104346
  36. 10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104739
  37. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100463
  38. 10.2307/256443
  39. 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00056-4
  40. 10.11613/BM.2012.031
  41. 10.1177/1938965514560014
  42. 10.4135/9781529728644
  43. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003
  44. 10.13189/ujm.2015.031006
  45. 10.1177/1096348014538052
  46. 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.011
  47. 10.1108/TR-08-2015-0037
  48. 10.1080/15332861.2018.1463793
  49. 10.7146/hjlcb.v11i21.25477
  50. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100445
  51. 10.1177/23294884211032316
  52. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100442
  53. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.008
  54. 10.1057/9781137388551_4
  55. 10.5465/amp.2014.0143
  56. 10.1177/2329488414525400
  57. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.020
  58. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.012
  59. 10.1108/JPBM-04-2018-1843
  60. 10.1177/0022242919889894
  61. 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.004
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →