Argumentation Mar 2022 Open Access

From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements

Marcin Koszowy Warsaw University of Technology ; Katarzyna Budzynska ; Martín Pereira-Fariña Universidade de Santiago de Compostela ; Rory Duthie Warsaw University of Technology

Abstract

AbstractIn their bookCommitment in Dialogue, Walton and Krabbe claim that formal dialogue systems for conversational argumentation are “not very realistic and not easy to apply”. This difficulty may make argumentation theory less well adapted to be employed to describe or analyse actual argumentation practice. On the other hand, the empirical study of real-life arguments may miss or ignore insights of more than the two millennia of the development of philosophy of language, rhetoric, and argumentation theory. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology for adapting such theories to serve as applicable tools in the study of argumentation phenomena. Our approach is boththeoretically-informedandempirically-groundedin large-scale corpus analysis. The area of interest are appeals to ethos, the character of the speaker, building upon Aristotle’s rhetoric. Ethotic techniques are used to influence the hearers through the communication, where speakers might establish, but also emphasise, weaken or undermine their own or others’ credibility and trustworthiness. Specifically, we apply our method to Aristotelian theory of ethos elements which identifiespractical wisdom,moral virtueandgoodwillas components of speakers’ character, which can be supported or attacked. The challenges we identified in this case and the solutions we proposed allow us to formulate general guidelines of how to exploit rich theoretical frameworks to the analysis of the practice of language use.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2022-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-021-09564-0
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism argument empirical research quantitative research
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Mulken et al. (2025)
    Improving Complaint Handling: The Rhetorical Turn in Defensive and Accommodativ…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Konat et al. (2024)
    Pathos in Natural Language Argumentation: Emotional Appeals and Reactions
    Argumentation
  3. Hinton (2024)
    Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegate…
    Argumentation
  4. Dębowska-Kozłowska et al. (2022)
    “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Gra…
    Argumentation

References (54) · 7 in this index

  1. Araszkiewicz, M., and M. Koszowy, 2016. Deontic authority in legal argumentation: A case study. In Argumentat…
  2. Aristotle (1991)
    On Rhetoric (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.)
  3. EM Barth (1982)
    From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation
     ↗
  4. Baumlin, J.S., and P.L. Scisco, 2018. Ethos and its Constitutive Role in Organizational Rhetoric. In The Hand…
     ↗
  5. A Brinton (1986)
    Brinton, A. 1986. Ethotic Argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly 3: 245–257.
    History of Philosophy Quarterly
Show all 54 →
  1. Budzynska, K. (2010). Argument Analysis: Components of Interpersonal Argumentation. In Frontiers in Artificia…
  2. Budzynska, K., and Reed, C. 2011. Whence inference. Technical report, University of Dundee.
  3. K Budzynska (2016)
    Budzynska, K., M. Janier, C. Reed, and P. Saint-Dizier. 2016. Theoretical foundations for illocutionary struc…
    Argument and Computation  ↗
  4. J Cohen (1960)
    Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–46.
    Educational and Psychological Measurement  ↗
  5. S Crowley (2004)
    Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students
  6. Duthie, R. and K. Budzynska. 2018a. A deep modular RNN approach for ethos mining. In Proceedings of the Twent…
     ↗
  7. Duthie, R. and K. Budzynska 2018b. Classifying types of ethos supports and attacks. In Proceedings of the 7th…
  8. El Baff, R., H. Wachsmuth, K. Al Khatib, M. Stede, and B. Stein. 2019. Computational argumentation synthesis …
     ↗
  9. J Fahnestock (2003)
    A Rhetoric of Argument
  10. E Garver (1994)
    Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An Art of Character. Philosophy/Classics/Rhetoric
  11. AI Goldman (2001)
    Goldman, A.I. 2001. Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63(1): 85–110.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  12. Goodwin (2011)
    Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts
    Argumentation
  13. J Goodwin (2010)
    Goodwin, J., and V. Cortes. 2010. Theorists’ and practitioners’ spatial metaphors for argumentation: A corpus…
    Verbum
  14. L Groarke (2013)
    Good Reasoning Matters! A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking
  15. Habernal, I., H. Wachsmuth, I. Gurevych, and B. Stein. 2018. Before name-calling: Dynamics and triggers of ad…
     ↗
  16. HW Hansen (2019)
    The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Chapter Fallacies
  17. J Hardwig (1991)
    Hardwig, J. 1991. The role of trust in knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 88(12): 693–708.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  18. Hidey, C., E. Musi, A. Hwang, S. Muresan, and K. McKeown. 2017. Analyzing the semantic types of claims and pr…
     ↗
  19. Hinton (2021)
    Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation
    Argumentation
  20. M Hinton (2019)
    Hinton, M., and A. Budzyńska-Daca. 2019. A comparative study of political communication in televised pre-elec…
    Research in Language  ↗
  21. S Jackson (2015)
    Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory
     ↗
  22. Janier, M., J. Lawrence, and C. Reed. 2014. OVA$$+$$: An argument analysis interface. In Computational Models…
  23. M Koszowy (2017)
    Koszowy, M., and D. Walton. 2017. Profiles of dialogue for repairing faults in arguments from expert opinion.…
    Logic and Logical Philosophy
  24. M Koszowy (2019)
    Koszowy, M., and D. Walton. 2019. Epistemic and deontic authority in the argumentum ad verecundiam. Pragmatic…
    Pragmatics and Society  ↗
  25. JR Landis (1977)
    Landis, J.R., and G.G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(…
    Biometrics  ↗
  26. J Lawrence (2020)
    Lawrence, J., and C. Reed. 2020. Argument mining: A survey. Computational Linguistics 45(4): 765–818.
    Computational Linguistics  ↗
  27. Lawrence, J., M. Janier and C. Reed. 2015. Working with open argument corpora. In Proceedings of the European…
  28. Liao (2021)
    The Legitimacy Crisis of Arguments from Expert Opinion: Can’t We Trust Experts?
    Argumentation
  29. K Lorenz (1978)
    Dialogische Logik
  30. Macagno (2013)
    Strategies of Character Attack
    Argumentation
  31. M Mizrahi (2013)
    Mizrahi, M. 2013. Why arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. Informal Logic 33(1): 57–79.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  32. E Musi (2019)
    Musi, E., and M. Aakhus. 2019. Framing fracking: Semantic frames as meta-argumentative indicators for knowled…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  ↗
  33. Musi, E., D. Ghosh, and S. Muresan. 2016. Towards feasible guidelines for the annotation of argument schemes.…
     ↗
  34. Pereira-Fariña, M., M. Koszowy, and K. Budzynska. 2022. ‘It was never just about the statue’: Ethos of histor…
     ↗
  35. Rapp, C. 2010. Aristotle’s rhetoric. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  36. M Seidel (2014)
    Seidel, M. 2014. Throwing the baby out with the water: From reasonably scrutinizing authorities to rampant sc…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  37. J Sim (2005)
    Sim, J., and C.C. Wright. 2005. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample s…
    Physical Therapy  ↗
  38. Stede, M., and J. Schneider. 2018. Argumentation Mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. M…
     ↗
  39. Tindale (2011)
    Character and Knowledge: Learning from the Speech of Experts
    Argumentation
  40. Visser et al. (2021)
    Annotating Argument Schemes
    Argumentation
  41. H Voormann (2008)
    Voormann, H., and U. Gut. 2008. Agile corpus creation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 4(2): 235–251.
    Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory  ↗
  42. Wacholder, N., S. Muresan, D. Ghosh, and M. Aakhus. 2014. Annotating multiparty discourse: Challenges for agr…
     ↗
  43. Wachsmuth, H., M. Stede, R. El Baff, K. Al Khatib, M. Skeppstedt, and B. Stein. 2018. Argumentation synthesis…
  44. Wagemans (2011)
    The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
    Argumentation
  45. D Walton (1997)
    Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority
  46. D Walton (1999)
    Walton, D. 1999. Ethotic arguments and fallacies: The credibility function in multi-agent dialogue systems. P…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  47. D Walton (1995)
    Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
  48. D Walton (2008)
    Argumentation Schemes
     ↗
  49. Wrisley, G. 2019. Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy, chapter Ad Homine…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication Apr 2021
    The Construction of Value in Science Research Articles: A Quantitative Study of Topoi Used in Introductions ↗
    Michael Carter
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument professional writing quantitative research
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2019
    Angry Public Rhetorics: Global Relations and Emotion in the Wake of 9/11 ↗
    Michael William Pfau
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument collaborative writing assessment empirical research public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric book reviews editorial matter
  3. Written Communication Jul 2016
    Value Arguments in Science Research Articles: Making the Case for the Importance of Research ↗
    Michael Carter
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument empirical research
  4. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  5. Poroi Feb 2026
    Using Stasis Theory as a Heuristic for Examining Epistemological Dilemmas in a Post-Truth Landscape ↗
    Bruce Bowles
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument