Abstract

AbstractAs more and more sophisticated software is created to allow the mining of arguments from natural language texts, this paper sets out to examine the suitability of the well-established and readily available methods of corpus linguistics to the study of argumentation. After brief introductions to corpus linguistics and the concept of meta-argument, I describe three pilot-studies into the use of the terms Straw man, Ad hominem, and Slippery slope, made using the open access News on the Web corpus. The presence of each of these phrases on internet news sites was investigated and assessed for correspondence to the norms of use by argumentation theorists. All three pilot-studies revealed interesting facts about the usage of the terms by non-specialists, and led to numerous examples of the types of arguments mentioned. This suggests such corpora may be of use in two different ways: firstly, the wider project of improving public debate and educating the populace in the skills of critical thinking can only be helped by a better understanding of the current state of knowledge of the technical terms and concepts of argumentation. Secondly, theorists could obtain a more accurate picture of how arguments are used, by whom, and to what reception, allowing claims on such matters to be evidence, rather than intuition, based.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2021-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-020-09533-z
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

References (58) · 7 in this index

  1. Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert, and Arne Zeschel. 2010. Cognitive Corpus Lingu…
    Corpora  
  2. Barlow, Michael. 2011. Corpus linguistics and theoretical linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Lingui…
    International Journal of Corpus Linguistics  
  3. Political Election Debates
  4. Clarin in the Low Countries
  5. Biber, Douglas. 2011. Corpus linguistics and the study of literature: Back to the future? Scientific Study of…
    Scientific Study of Literature  
Show all 58 →
  1. Biber, Douglas and James Jones. 2009. Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In Corpus linguistics: An i…
  2. Blair, J.Anthony. 2014. Critical review—meta-argumentation, an approach to logic and argumentation theory by …
    Informal Logic  
  3. Argumentation
  4. Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language
  5. Budzyńska, Katarzyna, Mathilde Janier, Juyeon Kang, Chris Reed, Patrick Saint-Dizier, Manfred Stede, and Olen…
  6. Cilliers, Charles. 2018. Sometimes you just want to tell a guy to go f*** himself. The Citizen. https://citiz…
  7. Cohen, Daniel. 2001. Evaluating arguments and making meta-arguments. Informal Logic 21 (2): 73–84.
    Informal Logic  
  8. Davies, Mark. 2013. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW): 3 + billion words from 20 countries, updated every day. …
  9. Devine, Philip. 2018. On slippery slopes. Philosophy 93: 375–395.
    Philosophy  
  10. Duthie, Rory, Katarzyna Budzyńska, and Chris Reed. 2016. Mining Ethos in Political Debate. In Computational M…
  11. A systematic Theory of Argumentation
  12. Eemeren, Frans van and Rob Grootendorst. 2015. Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. In Reasonableness…
  13. Argumentation
  14. Argumentation
  15. Meta-argumentation, an approach to logic and argumentation theory
  16. Flowerdew, Lynne. 2009. Applying corpus linguistics to pedagogy. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics …
    International Journal of Corpus Linguistics  
  17. Freeman, James. 2011. Argument Structure: Representation and Theory. Argumentation Library (18). Dordrecht: S…
  18. Goodwin, Jean, and Viviana Cortes. 2010. Theorists’ and practitioners’ spatial metaphors for argumentation: a…
    Verbum
  19. Gries, Stefan. 2010. Corpus linguistics and theoretical linguistics: A love–hate relationship? Not necessaril…
  20. Fallacies
  21. Argumentation
  22. Head, Tom. 2018. Cyril Ramaphosa blasts “desperate” Malema, Maimane on land issue. The South African. https:/…
  23. Hinton, Martin. 2018. Slippery slopes and other consequences. Logic and Logical Philosophy 27: 453–470. https…
    Logic and Logical Philosophy  
  24. Hinton, Martin. Forthcoming. Evaluating the Language of Argument. Cham: Springer.
  25. Argumentation
  26. Empirical Methods in Language Studies
  27. Koplenig, Alexander. 2019. Against Statistical significance testing in corpus linguistics. Corpus Linguistics…
    Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory  
  28. Krabbe, Eric. 2003. Metadialogues. In Anyone Who Has a View. Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argume…
  29. Lawrence, John, Jacky Visser, and Chris Reed. 2019. An Online Annotation Assistant for Argument Schemes. In P…
  30. Lewiński, Marcin, and Steve Oswald. 2013. When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive p…
  31. Locke, John. 1975 [1689]. An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2014. Manipulating Emotions. Value-Based Reasoning and Emotive Language. Argumentation and…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  33. Olver, Ian. 2018. Why we should consider whether it’s time to allow sex selection in IVF: NHMRC. The Conversa…
  34. Otto, Michael. 2018. Canada court claims over top. New Zealand Catholic. https://www.nzcatholic.org.nz/2018/0…
  35. The Linguistics of Political Argument
  36. Peldszus, Andreas, and Manfred Stede. 2013. From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: a survey…
    International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence  
  37. Reuter, Kevin. 2011. Distinguishing the Appearance from the Reality of Pain. Journal of Consciousness Studies…
    Journal of Consciousness Studies
  38. Rizzo, Mario, and Douglas Whitman. 2003. The camel’s nose in the tent: rules, theories and slippery slopes. U…
    UCLA Law Review
  39. Saad, Motaz and Wesam Ashour. 2010. OSAC: Open Source Arabic Corpora. 6th International Conference on Electri…
  40. Introduction to logical theory
  41. Fallacies and argument appraisal
  42. The Uses of Argument
  43. van der Burg, Wibren. 1991. The slippery slope argument. Ethics 102: 42–65.
    Ethics  
  44. Vieira, Lucas Nunes. 2020. Translating perceptions and managing expectations: an analysis of management and p…
    Perspectives  
  45. Visser, Jacky, Marcin Koszowy, Barbara Konat, Katarzyna Budzyńska, and Chris Reed. 2018. Straw man as misuse …
  46. Visser, Jacky, Barbara Konat, R. Rory Duthie, Marcin Koszowy, Katarzyna Budzyńska, and Chris Reed. 2019a. Arg…
    Lang Resources & Evaluation  
  47. Visser, Jacky, John Lawrence, Jean Wagemans, and Chris Reed. 2019b. An annotated corpus of argument schemes i…
  48. Wallis, Sean, and Gerald Nelson. 2001. Knowledge discovery in grammatically analysed corpora. Data Mining and…
    Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery  
  49. Slippery slope arguments
  50. Walton, Douglas. 1996. The straw man fallacy. In Logic and Argumentation, eds. Johan van Benthem, Frans. H. v…
  51. Walton, Douglas. 2015. The basic slippery slope argument. Informal Logic 35, 3: 273–311. https://doi.org/10.2…
  52. Argumentation
  53. Argumentation