Abstract

AbstractAs more and more sophisticated software is created to allow the mining of arguments from natural language texts, this paper sets out to examine the suitability of the well-established and readily available methods of corpus linguistics to the study of argumentation. After brief introductions to corpus linguistics and the concept of meta-argument, I describe three pilot-studies into the use of the terms Straw man, Ad hominem, and Slippery slope, made using the open access News on the Web corpus. The presence of each of these phrases on internet news sites was investigated and assessed for correspondence to the norms of use by argumentation theorists. All three pilot-studies revealed interesting facts about the usage of the terms by non-specialists, and led to numerous examples of the types of arguments mentioned. This suggests such corpora may be of use in two different ways: firstly, the wider project of improving public debate and educating the populace in the skills of critical thinking can only be helped by a better understanding of the current state of knowledge of the technical terms and concepts of argumentation. Secondly, theorists could obtain a more accurate picture of how arguments are used, by whom, and to what reception, allowing claims on such matters to be evidence, rather than intuition, based.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2021-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-020-09533-z
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Show all 7 →
  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
Also cites 27 works outside this index ↓
  1. Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert, and Arne Zeschel. 2010. Cognitive Corpus Lingu…
    Corpora  
  2. Barlow, Michael. 2011. Corpus linguistics and theoretical linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Lingui…
    International Journal of Corpus Linguistics  
  3. Biber, Douglas. 2011. Corpus linguistics and the study of literature: Back to the future? Scientific Study of…
    Scientific Study of Literature  
  4. Biber, Douglas and James Jones. 2009. Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In Corpus linguistics: An i…
  5. Blair, J.Anthony. 2014. Critical review—meta-argumentation, an approach to logic and argumentation theory by …
    Informal Logic  
  6. Cohen, Daniel. 2001. Evaluating arguments and making meta-arguments. Informal Logic 21 (2): 73–84.
    Informal Logic  
  7. Devine, Philip. 2018. On slippery slopes. Philosophy 93: 375–395.
    Philosophy  
  8. Duthie, Rory, Katarzyna Budzyńska, and Chris Reed. 2016. Mining Ethos in Political Debate. In Computational M…
  9. Eemeren, Frans van and Rob Grootendorst. 2015. Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. In Reasonableness…
  10. Flowerdew, Lynne. 2009. Applying corpus linguistics to pedagogy. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics …
    International Journal of Corpus Linguistics  
  11. Freeman, James. 2011. Argument Structure: Representation and Theory. Argumentation Library (18). Dordrecht: S…
  12. Gries, Stefan. 2010. Corpus linguistics and theoretical linguistics: A love–hate relationship? Not necessaril…
  13. Hinton, Martin. 2018. Slippery slopes and other consequences. Logic and Logical Philosophy 27: 453–470. https…
    Logic and Logical Philosophy  
  14. Koplenig, Alexander. 2019. Against Statistical significance testing in corpus linguistics. Corpus Linguistics…
    Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory  
  15. Krabbe, Eric. 2003. Metadialogues. In Anyone Who Has a View. Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argume…
  16. Lawrence, John, Jacky Visser, and Chris Reed. 2019. An Online Annotation Assistant for Argument Schemes. In P…
  17. Lewiński, Marcin, and Steve Oswald. 2013. When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive p…
  18. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2014. Manipulating Emotions. Value-Based Reasoning and Emotive Language. Argumentation and…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  19. The Linguistics of Political Argument
  20. Peldszus, Andreas, and Manfred Stede. 2013. From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: a survey…
    International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence  
  21. Fallacies and argument appraisal
  22. van der Burg, Wibren. 1991. The slippery slope argument. Ethics 102: 42–65.
    Ethics  
  23. Vieira, Lucas Nunes. 2020. Translating perceptions and managing expectations: an analysis of management and p…
    Perspectives  
  24. Visser, Jacky, Barbara Konat, R. Rory Duthie, Marcin Koszowy, Katarzyna Budzyńska, and Chris Reed. 2019a. Arg…
    Lang Resources & Evaluation  
  25. Wallis, Sean, and Gerald Nelson. 2001. Knowledge discovery in grammatically analysed corpora. Data Mining and…
    Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery  
  26. Slippery slope arguments
  27. Walton, Douglas. 2015. The basic slippery slope argument. Informal Logic 35, 3: 273–311. https://doi.org/10.2…