The Influence of Justification Content and Argument Source on Perceived Argument Quality

Kaisa Herne Tampere University ; Josefina Sipinen Tampere University ; Peter Söderlund University of Helsinki ; Elina Kestilä-Kekkonen Tampere University

Abstract

Argumentation is at the core of political communication. We study what criteria people use when they evaluate argument quality. We ask how justification content and argument source – who presents the argument – influence perceived argument quality, as well as how these two interact. Regarding justification content, we rely on criteria derived from deliberative democracy, and separate appeals to common or private interests. Regarding argument source, we study partial, impartial and reluctant sources. The promoted policy is in accordance with the interests of partial sources, it conflicts with the interests of reluctant sources, whereas impartial sources’ interests are not affected. We observed that appeals to common interest yielded higher perceived argument and justification quality compared to appeals to private interests. Our central observation was that sources did not influence perceived argument quality, unless arguments appealed to private interests. In other words, the influence of the argument source was contingent on argument content.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09694-3
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Show all 7 →
  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
Also cites 46 works outside this index ↓
  1. Adams, Brian E. 2014. Reason-giving in deliberative forums. Journal of Deliberative Democracy. https://doi.or…
    Journal of Deliberative Democracy  
  2. Anderson, Loren. 1970. An experimental study of reluctant and biased authority-based assertions. Journal of t…
    Journal of the American Forensic Association  
  3. Arnold, William E., and James C. McCroskey. 1967. The credibility of reluctant testimony. Central States Spee…
    Central States Speech Journal  
  4. Benoit, William L., A. Kimberly, and Kennedy. 1999. On reluctant testimony. Communication Quarterly. https://…
    Communication Quarterly  
  5. Bohman, James. 1998. Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philos…
    Journal of Political Philosophy  
  6. The persuasion handbook. Developments in theory and practice
  7. Briñol, Pablo, and Richard E. Petty. 2009. Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European…
    European Review of Social Psychology  
  8. Cacioppo, John T., E. Richard, Jeffrey Petty, Feinstein, W. Blair, and G. Jarvis. 1996. Dispositional differe…
    Psychological Bulletin  
  9. Callison, Coy. 2004. The Good, the Bad, and the ugly: Perceptions on public relations practitioners. Journal …
    Journal of Public Relations Research  
  10. Carpenter, Christopher J. 2015. A meta-analysis of the elm’s argument quality× processing type predictions. H…
    Human Communication Research  
  11. Chang, Chingching. 2007. The relative effectiveness of comparative and noncomparative advertising: Evidence f…
    Journal of Advertising  
  12. Chittleborough, Philip, and Morgan E. Newman. 1993. Defining the term argument. Informal Logic. https://doi.o…
    Informal Logic  
  13. Chu, Shu-Chuan, Sara Kamal. 2008. The effect of perceived blogger credibility and argument quality on message…
    Journal of Interactive Advertising  
  14. Collins, Peter, Ulrike Hahn, Ylva von Gerber, J. Erik, and Olsson. 2018. The bi-directional relationship betw…
    Frontiers in Psychology  
  15. Darley, William K., E. Robert, and Smith. 1995. Gender differences in information processing strategies: An e…
    Journal of Advertising  
  16. Garssen, Bart. 2022. The argumentative style of the opening speech of a debate in the European Parliament. Jo…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  17. Gerber, Marlene, André Bächtiger, Susumu Shikano, Simon Reber, and Samuel Rohr. 2018. Deliberative abilities …
    British Journal of Political Science  
  18. Why deliberative democracy?>
  19. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy
  20. Habermas, Jürgen. 2022. Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political pu…
    Theory Culture & Society  
  21. Hahn, Ulrike. 2020. Argument quality in real world argumentation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24(5):363–374.
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences  
  22. Hahn, Ulrike, Adam J. L. Harris, and Adam Corner. 2009. Argument content and argument source: An exploration.…
    Informal Logic  
  23. Han, Soo-Hye, William Schenck-Hamlin, and Donna Schenck-Hamlin. 2015. Inclusion, Equality, and discourse qual…
    Journal of Public Deliberation  
  24. Herne, Kaisa, Josefina Sipinen, Elina Kestilä-Kekkonen, Laura Mattinen, Peter, and Söderlund. 2022. The force…
    Frontiers in Communication  
  25. Himmelroos, Staffan, Henrik Serup Christensen. 2014. Deliberation and opinion change: Evidence from a deliber…
    Scandinavian Political Studies  
  26. Himmelroos, Staffan. 2017. Discourse quality in deliberative citizen Forums – A comparison of four deliberati…
    Journal of Public Deliberation  
  27. Hoeken, Hans, Ester Šorm, and Peter Jan Schellens. 2014. Arguing about the likelihood of consequences: Laypeo…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  28. Hoeken, Hans, Jos Hornikx, and Yvette Linders. 2020. The importance and use of normative criteria to manipula…
    Journal of Advertising  
  29. Hornikx, Jos., Hans Hoeken. 2007. Cultural differences in the persuasiveness of evidence types and evidence q…
    Communication Monographs  
  30. The pandemic of argumentation
  31. Kim, Donkmin, and Izak Benbasat. 2009. Trust-Assuring arguments in B2C E-commerce: Impact of Content, Source,…
    Journal of Management Information Systems  
  32. Argumentation in political deliberation
  33. McCroskey, James C. 1969. A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communi…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  34. McPeek, Robert W., and John D. Edwards. 1975. Expectancy disconfirmation and attitude change. Journal of Soci…
    Journal of Social Psychology  
  35. Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
  36. Meyers-Levy, Joan, and Durairaj Maheswaran. 1991. Exploring differences in males’ and females’ processing str…
    Journal of Consumer Research  
  37. Nöteberg, Anna, Ellen Christiaanse, and Philip E. Wallage. 2003. Consumer trust in electronic channels. E-Ser…
    E-Service Journal  
  38. Park, Hee, Timothy Sun, Y. Levine, Catherine, Tierney Kingsley Westerman, Orfgen, and Sarah Foregger. 2007. T…
    Human Communication Research  
  39. Petersen, Michael Bang, and Kevin Arceneaux. 2020. An intuitionist theory of argument strength in politics: H…
    Political Psychology  
  40. Pornpitakpan, Chanthika. 2004. The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decade’s e…
    Journal of Applied Social Psychology  
  41. Steenbergen, Marco R., André Bächtiger, Markus Spörndli, Jürg, and Steiner. 2003. Measuring political deliber…
    Comparative European Politics  
  42. Stubb, Carolina, Jonas Colliander. 2019. This is not sponsored content – The effects of impartiality disclosu…
    Computers in Human Behavior  
  43. Tormala, Zakary L., Pablo Briñol, and Richard E. Petty. 2006. When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of…
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology  
  44. Walster, Elaine, Elliot Aronson, and Darcy Abrahams. 1966. On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige…
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology  
  45. Yi, Mun Y., J. Jane, Joshua M. Yoon, Davis, and Taesik Lee. 2013. Untangling the antecedents of initial trust…
    Decision Support Systems  
  46. Ziegler René, Michael, Dehl, and Anja Ruther. 2002. Multiple source characteristics and persuasion: source in…
    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin