Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe the way in which argumentative patterns come into being in plenary debate over legislative issues in the European Parliament. What kind of argumentative patterns are to be expected within this macro context? It is shown that the argumentative patterns that come into being in legislative debate in the European Parliament depend for the most part on the problem-solving argumentation that is put forward in the opening speech by the rapporteur of the parliamentary committee report. This argumentation can be pragmatic problem-solving argumentation or complex problem-solving argumentation. The most important prototypical argumentative patterns are investigated in the argumentation put forward by the Members of parliament. This investigation is based on an inventory of the arguments that can in principle be used to support or attack the initial problem-solving argumentation put forward by the rapporteur.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2016-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-015-9378-y
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. Shaw, W.C. 1916. Systematic analysis of debating problems. Journal of Speech Communication 2: 344–351.
    Journal of Speech Communication  
  2. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory…
  3. Handbook of argumentation theory