Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining

Elena Musi Columbia University ; Mark Aakhus Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Abstract

A macroscope is proposed and tested here for the discovery of the unique argumentative footprint that characterizes how a collective (e.g., group, online community) manages differences and pursues disagreement through argument in a polylogue. The macroscope addresses broader analytic problems posed by various conceptualizations of large-scale argument, such as fields, spheres, communities, and institutions. The design incorporates a two-tier methodology for detecting argument patterns of the arguments performed in arguing by an interactive collective that produces views, or topographies, of the ways that issues are generated in the making and defending of standpoints. The design premises for the macroscope build on insights about argument patterns from pragma-dialectical theory by incorporating research and theory on disagreement management and the Argumentum Model of Topics. The design reconceptualizes prototypical and stereotypical argument patterns for characterizing large-scale argumentation. A prototype of the macroscope is tested on data drawn from six threads about oil-drilling and fracking from the subreddit Changemyview. The implementation suggests the efficacy of the macroscope’s design and potential for identifying what communities make controversial and how the disagreement space in a polylogue is managed through stereotypical argument patterns in terms of claims/premises, inferential relations, and presentational devices.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2018-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-017-9441-y
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (77) · 12 in this index

  1. Aakhus, Mark. 2013. Deliberation digitized: Designing disagreement space through communication-information se…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  2. Argumentation
  3. Aakhus, Mark, and Marcin Lewiński. 2011 Argument analysis in large-scale deliberation. In Keeping in touch wi…
  4. Aakhus, Mark, Smaranda Muresan, and Nina Wacholder. 2013. Integrating natural language processing and argumen…
  5. Aakhus, Mark, Paul Ziek, and Punit Dadlani. 2016. Argumentation in large, complex practices. OSSA Conference …
Show all 77 →
  1. Argumentation
  2. Becker, Maria, Alexis Palmer, and Anette Frank. 2016. Argumentative texts and clause types. In Proceedings of…
  3. Börner, Katy. 2011. Plug-and-play macroscopes. Communications of the ACM 54(3): 60–69.
    Communications of the ACM  
  4. Donohue, James P. 2006. How to support a one-handed economist: The role of modalisation in economic forecasti…
    English for Specific Purposes  
  5. Rhetorical figures in science
  6. Argumentation
  7. Argumentation
  8. Argument structure: Representation and theory
  9. Argumentation
  10. Ghosh, Debanjan, et al. 2014. Analyzing argumentative discourse units in online interactions. In Proceedings …
  11. Forms of talk
  12. Goodnight, G.Thomas. 2012. The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry int…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  13. Goodnight, G. Thomas. 1991. Controversy. In Argument in controversy: Proceedings of the seventh SCA/AFA confe…
  14. Goodwin, Paul D., and Joseph W. Wenzel. 1979. Proverbs and practical reasoning: A study in socio-logic. Quart…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  15. Argumentation
  16. Jackson, Sally. 1992. Virtual standpoints and the pragmatics of conversational argument. Argumentation Illumi…
    Argumentation Illuminated
  17. Jackson, Sally, and N. Lambert. 2015. A computational study of the vaccination controversy. Presented at the …
  18. Jacobs, Scott. 1987. The management of disagreement in conversation. Argumentation: Across the Lines of Disci…
  19. Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson. 1981. Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in co…
    Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports)
  20. Argumentation
  21. Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson. 2006. Derailments of argumentation: It takes two to tango. In Considering p…
  22. Kiefer, Ferenc. 1988. Linguistic, conceptual and encyclopedic knowledge: Some implications for lexicography. …
  23. Kienpointner, Manfred. 1992. Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Friedrich Fromman…
  24. Lewiński, Marcin. 2014. Argumentative polylogues: Beyond dialectical understanding of fallacies. Studies in L…
    Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric  
  25. Argumentation
  26. The language of evaluation
  27. McKerrow, Ray E. 1980. Argument communities: A quest for distinctions. In Proceedings of the Summer conferenc…
  28. Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory
  29. Reason in controversy: On general argumentation
  30. Argumentation in dispute mediation: A reasonable way to handle conflict
  31. Musi, Elena. 2016. Dalle apparenze alle inferenze: i verbi sembrare e apparire come indicatori argomentativi.…
  32. Musi, Elena. 2016. Strategies of objectifications in opinion articles: The case of evidentials. In Proceeding…
  33. Musi, Elena, Debanjan Ghosh, and Smaranda Muresan. 2016. Towards feasible guidelines for the annotation of ar…
    ACL
  34. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective
  35. O’Keefe, Daniel J. 1977. Two concepts of argument. Journal of American Forensic Association 13(3): 121–128.
    Journal of American Forensic Association
  36. O’Keefe, Daniel J. 1992. Two concepts of argument. Readings in Argumentation 11: 79–90.
    Readings in Argumentation  
  37. Peldszus, Andreas, and Manfred Stede. 2013. From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: A survey…
    International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI)  
  38. Peldszus, Andreas, and Manfred Stede. 2016. Rhetorical structure and argumentation structure in monologue tex…
  39. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (trans. John…
  40. Pollock, John L. 1987. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive science 11(4): 481–518.
    Cognitive science  
  41. Argumentation
  42. Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso. 2009. Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultu…
  43. Argumentation
  44. Rocci, Andrea. 2012. Modality and argumentative discourse relations: A study of the Italian necessity modal d…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  45. Modality in argumentation
  46. Rosch, Eleanor, and Carolyn B. Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of catego…
    Cognitive Psychology  
  47. Rowland, Robert C. 1986. The relationship between the public and the technical spheres of argument: A case st…
    Communication Studies
  48. Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts
  49. Tan, Chenhao, Vlad Niculae, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Lillian Lee. 2016 Winning arguments: Intera…
  50. The uses of argument
  51. Tuggy, David. 1993. Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic …
    Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic Bibliography)
  52. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory…
  53. Argumentation
  54. Prototypical argumentative patters
  55. Pondering on problems of argumentation. Twenty essays on theoretical issues
  56. Scrutinizing argumentation in practice
  57. Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation
  58. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Studies in rhetoric and communication
  59. Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen. 2013. Argumentative patterns in discourse. In Proceedings of the 10t…
  60. Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Bart Garssen. 2014. Argumentation by analogy in stereotypical argumentative patter…
  61. Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2015. Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In …
  62. Argumentation
  63. English modality in perspective: Genre analysis and contrastive studies
  64. Practical reasoning
  65. The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument
  66. Argumentation schemes
  67. Wenzel, Joseph W. 1979. Jürgen Habermas and the dialectical perspective on argumentation. Journal of the Amer…
    Journal of the American Forensic Association
  68. White, Peter R.R. 2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stanc…
    An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies
  69. White, Peter R.R. 2000. Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging…
  70. Willard, Charles A. 1981. Argument fields: A Cartesian meditation. In Dimensions of argument: Proceedings for…
  71. Willard, Charles A. 1996. Liberalism and the problem of knowledge: A new rhetoric for modern democracy. Chica…
  72. Zarefsky, David. 2014. Persistent questions in the theory of argument fields. In Rhetorical perspectives on a…