Abstract

Abstract“Why are millions of dollars worth of orders being left unpaid?”. With tweets like this questioning brands’ policies, activists advocating for sustainable fashion re-discuss material starting points that are assumed by fashion brands, who argue that they are sustainable because they care about their workers’ conditions. This paper argues that activists use tweets to open subdiscussions on material starting points to engage citizens and consumers, re-discussing factual data that brands take for granted, such as the fact that they provide fair conditions for their garment workers. Activists justify their opening of subdiscussions, often through an argumentative pattern that includes an argument based on the locus from effects to cause. They argue that if there are negative effects, the brand cannot claim to care about the conditions of its workers. In discussing how subdiscussions are used by fashion activists, this paper also introduces a conceptualization of Twitter argumentation as a discussion that is not isolated, but is part of a polylogical argumentation that takes place in different venues. For this reason, the argumentation used in tweets is reconstructed as a response to a fashion brand’s communication campaigns around sustainability, which extend beyond the confines of Twitter. As an empirical illustration, this paper is based on the campaign targeting fashion retailer Primark; the dataset includes the brand’s website as well as activists’ tweets.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2023-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-022-09579-1
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. The ethics of online research. Advances in research ethics and integrity
  2. Balabanova, E., and R. Palmieri. 2020. Talking at cross-purpose? ASOS, twitter and the fast-fashion backlash.…
  3. Argumentation in actual practice. Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
  4. Dach, L., and K. Allmendiger. 2014. Sustainability in corporate communications and its influence on consumer …
    Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences  
  5. Dascal, M. 1989/2003. Understanding controversies. Reprinted in Dascal, M. 2003. Interpretation and understan…
  6. Elliott-Maksymowicz, K., A. Nikolaev, and D. Porpora. 2021. How much can you say in a tweet? An approach to p…
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications  
  7. Foderaro, A., and D.G. Lorentzen. 2022. Argumentative practices and patterns in debating climate change on Tw…
    Aslib Journal of Information Management  
  8. Giglietto, F., L. Rossi, and D. Bennato. 2012. The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Faceboo…
    Journal of Technology in Human Services  
  9. Goodwin, J. 2020. Should climate scientists fly? A case study of arguments at the system level. Informal Logi…
    Informal Logic  
  10. Greco, S., and B. De Cock. 2021. Argumentative misalignments in the controversy surrounding fashion sustainab…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  11. Greco, S., C. Mercuri, and B. De Cock. 2021. Victims or agents for change? The representation and self-repres…
    Babylonia  
  12. Jackson, S. 2019. Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi 38(4): 631–643. https://d…
    Topoi  
  13. Fashion communication
  14. Karamalak, O., N. Kalbaska, and L. Cantoni. 2021. What do hashtags afford in digital fashion communication? A…
    Semiotica  
  15. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2004) Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.10…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  16. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  17. Orminski, J., E.C. Tandoc Jr., and B.H. Detenber. 2021. #sustainablefashion—A conceptual framework for sustai…
    Environmental Communication  
  18. Inference in argumentation: A topics-based approach to argument schemes
  19. Roginsky, S., and B. De Cock. 2015. Faire campagne sur Twitter. Modalités d’énonciation et mises en récit des…
    Les Cahiers Du Numérique  
  20. Schaefer, R., and M. Stede. 2021. Argument mining on Twitter: A survey. Information Technology 63(1): 45–58. …
    Information Technology  
  21. Tuite, A. 2018. Communicating material characteristics in a digital age: Three case studies in independent fa…
  22. Prototypical argumentative patterns. Exploring the relationship between argumentative dis…
  23. Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective