Argumentation Nov 2016 Open Access

Multiple Audiences as Text Stakeholders: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Complex Rhetorical Situations

Rudi Palmieri University of Liverpool ; Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati Università della Svizzera italiana

Abstract

In public communication contexts, such as when a company announces the proposal for an important organizational change, argumentation typically involves multiple audiences, rather than a single and homogenous group, let alone an individual interlocutor. In such cases, an exhaustive and precise characterization of the audience structure is crucial both for the arguer, who needs to design an effective argumentative strategy, and for the external analyst, who aims at reconstructing such a strategic discourse. While the peculiar relevance of multiple audience is often emphasized in the argumentation literature and in rhetorical studies, proposals for modelling multi-audience argumentative situations remain scarce and unsystematic. To address this gap, we propose an analytical framework which integrates three conceptual constructs: (1) Rigotti and Rocci’s notion of communicative activity type, understood as the implementation of an interaction scheme into a piece of institutional reality, named interaction field; (2) the stakeholder concept, originally developed in strategic management and public relations studies to refer to any actor who affects and/or is affected by the organizational actions and who, accordingly, carries an interest in them; (3) the concept of participant role as it emerges from Goffman’s theory of conversation analysis and related linguistic and media studies. From this integration, we derive the notion of text stakeholder for referring to any organizational actor whose interest (stake) becomes an argumentative issue which the organizational text must account for in order to effectively achieve its communicative aim. The text stakeholder notion enables a more comprehensive reconstruction and characterization of multiple audience by eliciting the relevant participants staged in a text and identifying, for each of them, the interactional role they have, the peculiar interest they bear and the related argumentative issue they create. Considering as an illustrative case the defense document issued by a corporation against a hostile takeover attempt made by another corporation, we show how this framework can support the analysis of strategic maneuvering by better defining the audience demand and, so, better explaining how real arguers design and adapt their topical and presentational choices.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2016-11-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-016-9394-6
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Greco (2023)
    Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Ill…
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Lewiński et al. (2014)
    Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry
    Argumentation
  2. Zarefsky (2008)
    Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation
    Argumentation
  3. Tindale (2007)
    Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise
    Argumentation
  4. Jacobs (2000)
    Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics
    Argumentation
  5. SCHRIVER (1992)
    Teaching Writers to Anticipate Readers' Needs
    Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Park (1982)
    The Meanings of "Audience"
    College English
Also cites 40 works outside this index ↓
  1. M Aakhus (2011)
    Keeping in touch with Pragma-dialectics
     ↗
  2. M Aakhus (2008)
    Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
     ↗
  3. A Bell (1984)
    Bell, A. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204.
    Language in Society  ↗
  4. WL Benoit (1994)
    Benoit, W.L., and J.M. D’Agostine. 1994. The case of the midnight judges” and multiple audience discourse: Ch…
    The Southern Communication Journal  ↗
  5. NM Brennan (1999)
    Brennan, N.M. 1999. Voluntary disclosure of profit forecasts by target companies in takeover bids. Journal of…
    Journal of Business Finance & Accounting  ↗
  6. NM Brennan (2010)
    Brennan, N.M., C. Daly, and C. Harrington. 2010. Rhetoric, argument and impression management in hostile take…
    British Accounting Review  ↗
  7. Cicero. 1942. De Oratore in two volumes. With an English translation by H. Rackham. London: William Heinemann.
     ↗
  8. Clark, H.H., and T.B. Carlson. 1982. Hearers and Speech Acts, Language 58(2):332–373. Reprinted in: H.H. Clar…
     ↗
  9. TE Cooke (1998)
    Cooke, T.E., R.G. Luther, and B.R. Pears. 1998. The information content of defence documents in UK hostile ta…
    Journal of Business Finance & Accounting  ↗
  10. Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and im…
     ↗
  11. M Dynel (2011)
    Dynel, M. 2011. Revisiting Goffman’s postulates on participant statuses in verbal interaction. Language and L…
    Language and Linguistics Compass  ↗
  12. L Ede (1984)
    Ede, L. 1984. Audience: An introduction to research. College Composition and Communication 35(2): 140–154.
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  13. L Ede (1984)
    Ede, L., and A. Lunsford. 1984. Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theo…
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  14. KM Eisenhardt (1989)
    Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1): 57–74.
    Academy of Management Review  ↗
  15. Fernandez, P. 2001. Valuation using multiples: How do analysts reach their conclusions? Working Paper, IESE B…
     ↗
  16. S Greco Morasso (2011)
    Argumentation in dispute mediation. A reasonable way to handle conflict
     ↗
  17. PM Healy (2001)
    Healy, P.M., and K.G. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A r…
    Journal of Accounting and Economics  ↗
  18. E Huettman (1996)
    Huettman, E. 1996. Writing for multiple audiences: An examination of audience concerns in a hospitality consu…
    The Journal of Business Communication  ↗
  19. L Illia (2013)
    Illia, L., F. Lurati, and R. Casalaz. 2013. Situational theory of publics: Exploring a cultural ethnocentric …
    Journal of Public Relations Research  ↗
  20. L Illia (2006)
    Illia, L., and F. Lurati. 2006. Stakeholder perspectives on organizational identity: Searching for a relation…
    Corporate Reputation Review  ↗
  21. Jacobs, S. 2009. Nonfallacious rhetorical design in argumentation. In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation,…
     ↗
  22. DA Jameson (2000)
    Jameson, D.A. 2000. Telling the investment story: A narrative analysis of shareholder reports. Journal of Bus…
    Journal of Business Communication  ↗
  23. J Jasinski (2001)
    Sourcebook on rhetoric: Key concepts in contemporary rhetorical studies
     ↗
  24. TS Johansen (2011)
    Johansen, T.S., and A.E. Nielsen. 2011. Strategic stakeholder dialogues: A discursive perspective on relation…
    Corporate Communications: An International Journal  ↗
  25. C Kerbrat-Orecchioni (2004)
    Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1–24.
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  26. J McCawley (1999)
    McCawley, J. 1999. Participant roles, frames, and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 595–619.
    Linguistics and Philosophy  ↗
  27. R Mitchell (1997)
    Mitchell, R., Agle, B., and Wood, D. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defini…
    Academy of Management Review  ↗
  28. F Myers (1999)
    Myers, F. 1999. Political argumentation and the composite audience: A case study. Quarterly Journal of Speech…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  29. R Palmieri (2012)
    Exploring argumentative contexts
     ↗
  30. R Palmieri (2014)
    Corporate argumentation in takeover bids
     ↗
  31. R Palmieri (2015)
    Palmieri, R., A. Rocci, and N. Kudrautsava. 2015. Argumentation in earnings conference calls. Corporate stand…
    Studies in Communication Sciences  ↗
  32. JE Post (2002)
    Redefining the corporation: Stakeholders management and organizational wealth
     ↗
  33. A Rocci (2009)
    Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering
     ↗
  34. Ross, W.D. 1958. Aristotle. Topica et sophistici elenchi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     ↗
  35. P Shoemaker (2009)
    Gatekeeping theory
     ↗
  36. C Tindale (2004)
    Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice
     ↗
  37. F Trautwein (1990)
    Trautwein, F. 1990. Merger motives and merger prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal 11: 283–295.
    Strategic Management Journal  ↗
  38. FH Eemeren Van (2010)
    Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse
     ↗
  39. FH Eemeren Van (2002)
    Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis
     ↗
  40. MA Rees Van (2011)
    Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 16 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Poroi Feb 2026
    Using Stasis Theory as a Heuristic for Examining Epistemological Dilemmas in a Post-Truth Landscape ↗
    Bruce Bowles
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2025
    The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958 ↗
    Christopher W. Tindale
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis revision argument collaborative writing editorial matter
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025
    Introduction: On the Desirability of Speaking to Others ↗
    Nirvana Tanoukhi; Nicholas Dunn
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument social media race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric literary studies editorial matter
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric Sep 2024
    Where’s the Rhetoric? Imagining a Unified Field ↗
    Joshua Hanan
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism composition theory genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics argument qualitative research quantitative research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
  5. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2024
    Populist Rhetorics Case Studies and a Minimalist Definition ↗
    Arthur E. Walzer
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument digital rhetoric social media disability studies public rhetoric editorial matter