Orchestrating Difference: The Address of Composite Audiences as Pluralist Rhetoric

Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2022

Orchestrating Difference: The Address of Composite Audiences as Pluralist Rhetoric

Tommy Bruhn University of Copenhagen

Abstract

ABSTRACTSpeakers may argue in ways that facilitate cooperation, without really establishing unity. If emphasis is put on the word “composite” in composite audience, then the complementary act of addressing such an audience can be understood as an orchestration of different people, who may cooperate toward a conclusion. This brings attention to the multidimensionality of issues in pluralistic communities and the range of consequences proposals may have. Following Perelman’s and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric, I discuss how the compositeness of such argumentation can be fruitfully approached pluralistically. I argue that proposals on practical issues imply concomitant situations, wherein audiences are assigned different roles to play toward the ends of argumentation. This means that rhetorical argumentation performs implicit diplomacy, with implications for different audiences and the relationships between them. I conclude this article by discussing what this pluralistic and interactional account means for the analysis and evaluation of arguments and their rhetoric.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2022-06-01
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.55.2.0177
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

Kock (2013)

Defining Rhetorical Argumentation

Philosophy & Rhetoric
Duncan (2011)

Polemical Ambiguity and the Composite Audience: Bush's 20 September 2001 Speech…

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓

(1994)

“The Case of the Midnight Judges’ and Multiple Audience Discourse: Chief Justice Marshall…

Southern Journal of Communication ↗
(2005)

“Barack Obama’s Address to the 2004 Democratic National Convention: Trauma, Compromise, C…

Rhetoric & Public Affairs ↗
(2007)

“The Relevance of Intention in Argument Evaluation.”

Argumentation ↗
(1999)

“Political Argumentation and the Composite Audience: A Case Study.”

Quarterly Journal of Speech ↗
(2016)

“Multiple Audiences as Text Stakeholders: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Complex Rh…

Argumentation ↗
(1999)

“Tactical Apologia: The American Nursing Association and Assisted Suicide.”

Southern Journal of Communication ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →