Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2022

Orchestrating Difference: The Address of Composite Audiences as Pluralist Rhetoric

Tommy Bruhn University of Copenhagen

Abstract

ABSTRACTSpeakers may argue in ways that facilitate cooperation, without really establishing unity. If emphasis is put on the word “composite” in composite audience, then the complementary act of addressing such an audience can be understood as an orchestration of different people, who may cooperate toward a conclusion. This brings attention to the multidimensionality of issues in pluralistic communities and the range of consequences proposals may have. Following Perelman’s and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric, I discuss how the compositeness of such argumentation can be fruitfully approached pluralistically. I argue that proposals on practical issues imply concomitant situations, wherein audiences are assigned different roles to play toward the ends of argumentation. This means that rhetorical argumentation performs implicit diplomacy, with implications for different audiences and the relationships between them. I conclude this article by discussing what this pluralistic and interactional account means for the analysis and evaluation of arguments and their rhetoric.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2022-06-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.55.2.0177
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument assessment
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (24) · 4 in this index

  1. (1994)
    “The Case of the Midnight Judges’ and Multiple Audience Discourse: Chief Justice Marshall…
    Southern Journal of Communication  ↗
  2. (2016)
    Mikhail Bakhtin: Rhetoric, Poetics, Dialogics, Rhetoricality
  3. (1989)
    “Rethinking the Rhetorical Situation from within the Thematic of ‘Différance.’”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. (2010)
    “Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s ‘On Temporality as a Characteristic of Argum…
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. (2018)
    Delade meningar. Retorisk flertydighet och den pluralistiska publiken i politiska förnyelseprocesser
Show all 24 →
  1. (1973)
    The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action
  2. (2001)
    Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson
  3. (1979)
    Liberalism and Sociology: LT Hobhouse and Political Argument in England 1880–1914
  4. (1984)
    The Practice of Everyday Life
  5. Duncan (2011)
    Polemical Ambiguity and the Composite Audience: Bush's 20 September 2001 Speech…
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. (2005)
    “Barack Obama’s Address to the 2004 Democratic National Convention: Trauma, Compromise, C…
    Rhetoric & Public Affairs  ↗
  7. Jørgensen (2007)
    The Relevance of Intention in Argument Evaluation
    Argumentation
  8. Kock (2013)
    Defining Rhetorical Argumentation
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  9. (1999)
    “Political Argumentation and the Composite Audience: A Case Study.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  10. Palmieri et al. (2016)
    Multiple Audiences as Text Stakeholders: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing C…
    Argumentation
  11. (1963)
    The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument
  12. (1979)
    The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and Its Applications
  13. (1971)
    The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
  14. (1999)
    “Tactical Apologia: The American Nursing Association and Assisted Suicide.”
    Southern Journal of Communication  ↗
  15. (2001)
    Justice as Fairness: A Restatement
  16. Sterne, Laurence. 1997. “The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman.”Project Gutenberg. www.gutenber…
  17. (2015)
    The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
  18. (1984)
    Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle
  19. (2014)
    Doublespeak: The Rhetoric of the Far Right since 1945
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2025
    McKeon on Rhetoric and Technology: The Challenge of 0 (Zero) ↗
    Reingard Nethersole
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument assessment
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2024
    The Rhetorical Methodology of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Theory of Argumentation ↗
    Blake D. Scott
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument assessment
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2023
    The State of UX Pedagogy ↗
    Philip B. Gallagher; Guiseppe Getto
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment technical communication book reviews
  4. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2023
    Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates ↗
    Divine N. Aboagye
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment race and writing public rhetoric affect and writing
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2022
    Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates ↗
    Robert McDonald
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics argument assessment public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric