Defining Rhetorical Argumentation

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article argues for a definition of rhetorical argumentation based on the theme of the argumentation, that is, the issue in dispute, rather than its aim (e.g., to “win”) or its means (e.g., emotional appeals). It claims that the principal thinkers in the rhetorical tradition, from Aristotle onward, saw rhetoric as practical reasoning, that is, reasoning on action or choice, not on propositions that may be either true or false. Citing several contemporary philosophers, the article argues that this definition highlights certain distinctive properties of rhetorical argumentation that tend to be overlooked or undertheorized in argumentation theory.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2013-11-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0437
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 27 works outside this index ↓
  1. Campbell, John Angus. 2003. “Why Was Darwin Believed? Darwin's Origin and the Problem of Intellectual Revolut…
  2. Campbell, John Angus, and Keith R. Benson. 1996. “The Rhetorical Turn in Science Studies.” Quarterly Journal …
  3. Dryzek, John. 2010. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory 38 (3): 319–39.
  4. Farrell, Thomas J. 1998. “Sizing Things Up: Colloquial Reflection as Practical Wisdom.” Argumentation 12 (1): 1–14.
  5. Goodin, Robert E. 2005. “Democratic Deliberation Within.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (1): 81–109.
  6. Heath, Malcolm. 1995. Hermogenes on Issues: Strategies of Argument in Later Greek Rhetoric. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  7. Humberstone, I. L. 1992. “Direction of Fit.” Mind, n.s., 101 (401): 59–83.
  8. Jacobs, Scott. 2000. “Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics.” Argumentation 14 (…
  9. Kenny, Anthony. 1966. “Practical Inference.” Analysis 26 (3): 65–75.
  10. Kock, Christian. 2003. “Multidimensionality and Non-Deductiveness in Deliberative Argumentation.” In Anyone W…
  11. Kock, Christian. 2007a. “Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate.” Informal Logic 27 (3): 233–47.
  12. Kock, Christian. 2007b. “Norms of Legitimate Dissensus.” Informal Logic 27 (2): 179–96.
  13. Kock, Christian. 2009. “Choice Is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation.” Argumentation 2…
  14. Kock, Christian. 2010. “The Difference Between the Rhetorical and the Philosophical Concept of Argumentation.…
  15. Larmore, Charles. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Leff, Michael. 1998. “Cicero's Pro Murena and the Strong Case for Rhetoric.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 (1…
  17. Rawls, John. 1997. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” University of Chicago Law Review 64 (3): 765–807.
  18. Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  19. Searle, John A.. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Siegel, Harvey, and John Biro. 1997. “Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and Fallacies.” Argumentation 11 …
  21. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 1999. “Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.” Discou…
  22. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2000. “Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework…
  23. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” I…
  24. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2003. “The Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Arg…
  25. Vico, Giambattista. 1996. The Art of Rhetoric (Institutiones Oratoriae, 1711–1741). Ed. Giuliano Crifo. Trans…
  26. Williams, Bernard. 1981. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Wright, Georg Henrik von. 1963. “Practical Inference.” Philosophical Review 72 (2): 159–79.
CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network →