Defining Rhetorical Argumentation

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article argues for a definition of rhetorical argumentation based on the theme of the argumentation, that is, the issue in dispute, rather than its aim (e.g., to “win”) or its means (e.g., emotional appeals). It claims that the principal thinkers in the rhetorical tradition, from Aristotle onward, saw rhetoric as practical reasoning, that is, reasoning on action or choice, not on propositions that may be either true or false. Citing several contemporary philosophers, the article argues that this definition highlights certain distinctive properties of rhetorical argumentation that tend to be overlooked or undertheorized in argumentation theory.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2013-11-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0437
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (70) · 8 in this index

  1. Anon. 1964. Ad C. Herennium: De ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium). Trans. Harry Caplan. Cambridge, MA:…
  2. Anscombe, G. E. M. 1957. Intention. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  3. Aristotle. 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Prin…
  4. Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  5. Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Show all 70 →
  1. Berlin, Isaiah. 1991. The Crooked Timber of Humanity. London: Fontana.
  2. Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1968. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14.
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Campbell, George. 1987. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Ed. Lloyd F. Bitzer. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univer…
  5. Campbell, John Angus. 2003. “Why Was Darwin Believed? Darwin's Origin and the Problem of Intellectual Revolut…
  6. Campbell, John Angus, and Keith R. Benson. 1996. “The Rhetorical Turn in Science Studies.” Quarterly Journal …
  7. Cicero. 1967. De oratore; De fato; Paradoxa stoicorum; De partitione ratoria. Trans. Edward W. Sutton and Har…
  8. Cicero. 1968. De inventione; De optimo genere oratorum; Topica. Trans. H. M. Hubell. London: Heinemann.
  9. Dryzek, John. 2010. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory 38 (3): 319–39.
  10. Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2003. Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Argumentation
  12. Geach, Peter Thomas. 1976. Reason and Argument. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  13. Goodin, Robert E. 2005. “Democratic Deliberation Within.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (1): 81–109.
  14. Govier, Trudy. 2007. “Two Is a Small Number: False Dichotomies Revisited.” In Dissensus and the Search for Co…
  15. Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  16. Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizitat und Geltung: Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen…
  17. Rhetoric Review
  18. Hauser, Gerald A. 2002. Introduction to Rhetorical Theory. 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
  19. Heath, Malcolm. 1995. Hermogenes on Issues: Strategies of Argument in Later Greek Rhetoric. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  20. Humberstone, I. L. 1992. “Direction of Fit.” Mind, n.s., 101 (401): 59–83.
  21. Argumentation
  22. Johnson, Ralph H. 1990. “Acceptance is Not Enough: A Critique of Hamblin.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (4): 271–87.
  23. Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair. 1977. Logical Self-Defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
  24. Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair. 2006. Logical Self-Defense. London: International Debate Education A…
  25. Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Ed. Heiner F. Klemme. Hamburg: Meiner.
  26. Kennedy, George A. 1999. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Ti…
  27. Kenny, Anthony. 1966. “Practical Inference.” Analysis 26 (3): 65–75.
  28. Kenny, Anthony. 1979. Aristotle's Theory of the Will. London: Duckworth.
  29. Kock, Christian. 2003. “Multidimensionality and Non-Deductiveness in Deliberative Argumentation.” In Anyone W…
  30. Kock, Christian. 2007a. “Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate.” Informal Logic 27 (3): 233–47.
  31. Kock, Christian. 2007b. “Norms of Legitimate Dissensus.” Informal Logic 27 (2): 179–96.
  32. Argumentation
  33. Kock, Christian. 2010. “The Difference Between the Rhetorical and the Philosophical Concept of Argumentation.…
  34. Kock, Christian. 2011. “Why Argumentation Theory Should Differentiate Between Types of Claim.” In Conductive …
  35. Larmore, Charles. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Leff, Michael. 1998. “Cicero's Pro Murena and the Strong Case for Rhetoric.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 (1…
  37. Leff, Michael. 2006. “Rhetoric, Dialectic, and the Functions of Argument.” In Considering Pragma-Dialectics, …
  38. Locke, John. 1996. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Kenneth Winkler. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
  39. Miller, Joseph M., Michael H. Prosser, and Thomas W. Benson, eds. 1973. Readings in Medieval Rhetoric. Bloomi…
  40. Nussbaum, Martha. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Perelman, Chaïm. 1990. “The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning.” Trans. Evelyne Griffin-Collart an…
  42. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. La nouvelle rhétorique: Traité de l'argumentation. Paris: …
  43. Perelman, Chaïm. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weave…
  44. Putnam, Hilary. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge MA: Harvard Univer…
  45. Quintilian. 1969. Institutio oratoria. Transl. H. E. Butler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  46. Rawls, John. 1989. “The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus.” New York University Law Review 64…
  47. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  48. Rawls, John. 1997. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” University of Chicago Law Review 64 (3): 765–807.
  49. Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  50. Raz, Joseph. 1998. “Incommensurability and Agency.” In Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Rea…
  51. Raz, Joseph. 2000. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  52. Searle, John A. 1975. “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind and Knowledge, ed. Keith Gunderso…
  53. Searle, John A.. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  54. Searle, John A.. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  55. Argumentation
  56. Stocker, Michael. 1990. Plural and Conflicting Values. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  57. Toulmin, Stephen E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  58. Valla, Lorenzo. 1970. De vero falsoque bono. Ed. Maristella de Panizza Lorch. Bari: Adriatica.
  59. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 1999. “Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.” Discou…
  60. Argumentation
  61. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” I…
  62. Argumentation
  63. Vico, Giambattista. 1996. The Art of Rhetoric (Institutiones Oratoriae, 1711–1741). Ed. Giuliano Crifo. Trans…
  64. Williams, Bernard. 1981. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  65. Wright, Georg Henrik von. 1963. “Practical Inference.” Philosophical Review 72 (2): 159–79.