Legal Audiences

Fábio Perin Shecaira Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro ; Noel Struchiner Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2018-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-017-9446-6
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (34) · 3 in this index

  1. Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of the Legal Order
  2. Batson, C.Daniel, Tricia Klein, Lori Highberger, and Laura Shaw. 1995. Immorality From Empathy-Induced Altrui…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  3. Judges and their Audiences. A Perspective on Judicial Behavior
  4. Black, Ryan, Ryan Owens, Justin Wedeking, and Patrick Wohlfarth. 2016. The Influence of Public Sentiment on S…
    Law and Society Review  
  5. The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument
Show all 34 →
  1. The Rhetoric of Reason
  2. da Silva, Virgilio Afonso. 2013. Deciding without Deliberating. I-Con 11: 557–584.
    I-Con
  3. da Silva, Virgilio Afonso. 2015. De Quem Divergem os Divergentes: os Votos Vencidos no Supremo Tribunal Feder…
    Direito, Estado e Sociedade
  4. Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation
  5. Practical Reasoning in Human Affairs: Studies in Honor of Chaim Perelman
  6. Fuller, Lon. 1958. Positivism and Fidelity to Law. Harvard Law Review 71: 630–672.
    Harvard Law Review  
  7. Law as a Leap of Faith
  8. George, Tracey, and Mitu Gulati. 2016. Courts of Good and Ill Repute: Garoupa and Ginsburg’s Judicial Reputat…
    University of Chicago Law Review
  9. Goutal, Jean Louis. 1976. Characteristics of Judicial Style in France, Britain and the USA. American Journal …
    American Journal of Comparative Law  
  10. Essays on Bentham. Jurisprudence and Political Theory
  11. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  12. Comparative and Private International Law: Essays in Honor of John Henry Merryman
  13. Judicial Deliberations. A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy
  14. Leiter, Brian. 2009. Explaining Theoretical Disagreement. University of Chicago Law Review 76: 1215–1250.
    University of Chicago Law Review
  15. MacCormick, Neil. 1993. Argumentation and Interpretation in Law. Ratio Juris 6: 16–29.
    Ratio Juris  
  16. Markesinis, Basil. 2000. Judicial Style and Judicial Reasoning in England and Germany. Cambridge Law Journal …
    Cambridge Law Journal  
  17. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America
  18. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  19. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications
  20. Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning
  21. Pizarro, D.A., E. Uhlmann, and P. Bloom. 2003. Causal Deviance and the Attribution of Moral Responsibility. J…
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology  
  22. How Judges Think
  23. Ethics in the Public Domain
  24. Thinking like a Lawyer
  25. Shecaira, Fábio Perin. 2015. Sources of law are not legal norms. Ratio Juris 28(1): 15–30.
    Ratio Juris  
  26. Shecaira, Fábio Perin. 2017. Legal arguments from scholarly authority. Ratio Juris 30(3): 305–321.
    Ratio Juris  
  27. Rhetorical Argumentation. Principles of Theory and Practice
  28. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  29. Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation