Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience:

Christopher W. Tindale University of Windsor

Abstract

ABSTRACT Theories of argumentation that give serious attention to rhetorical features, such as those of Aristotle and Chaïm Perelman, assign an important role to the audience when considering how argumentation should be constructed and evaluated. But neither of these theorists provides ways of thinking about audience that is adequate to the range of questions raised by this central concept. In this article, I explore one of these questions—that of audience identity—and consider the degree to which this issue has been recognized by the theorists in question and how we might move from their conceptions of it to a better understanding of the importance of identity in argumentation and how it should be treated.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2013-11-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0508
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Interve…
  2. Farrell, Thomas B. 1993. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  3. Kornprobst, Markus. 2008. Irredentism in European Politics: Argumentation, Compromise, and Norms. Cambridge: …
  4. Ray, John W. 1978. “Perelman's Universal Audience.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 64 (4): 361–75.
  5. Tindale, Christopher W. 2006. “Perelman, Informal Logic and the Historicity of Reason.” Informal Logic 26 (3)…
  6. Tindale, Christopher W. 2010b. “Ways of Being Reasonable: Perelman and the Philosophers.” Philosophy and Rhet…
  7. Tindale, Christopher W. 2011. “Out of the Space of Reasons: Argumentation, Agents and Persons.” Pragmatics an…
  8. Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CrossRef global citation count: 17 View in citation network →