Argument’s Autonomy Problem

John Casey Northeastern Illinois University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Autonomy is foundational to ethics, political philosophy, philosophy of mind, and it has been closely associated with argumentation. What is curious about autonomy is that it has traditionally been explained in terms of reasoning and argument: autonomy involves reasoning because, standardly, someone who’s autonomous is one who thinks things through, who has reasons for their actions. Autonomy regards argument because to respect the autonomy of someone who thinks things through, one must offer them reasons, that is, argue with them. One common thought is that provided one’s arguments meet certain criteria (e.g., they’re not sophistries or clever manipulations), then argument respects autonomy. But is this really so? No. Properly understood, argument is a kind of paternalism, for to argue with someone means to enter into and manage their stream of reasons, the very things that account for their autonomy.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-12-02
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0276
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric

References (43) · 2 in this index

  1. Epistemic Paternalism: A Defence
  2. Why We Argue (and How We Should): Guide to Disagreement in an Age of Unreason
  3. “The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification.”
    Philosophical Perspectives  
  4. “Varieties of Autonomy.”
    Unprincipled Virtue
  5. Bailin, Sharon, and MarkBattersby. 2017. “DAMned if You Do, DAMned if You Don’t: Cohen’s ‘Missed Opportunitie…
Show all 43 →
  1. Critical Thinking: A Student’s Introduction
  2. “Argumentation and Informed Consent in the Doctor–Patient Relationship.”
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  3. “Characteristics of Arguments and Arguing.”
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  4. “Adversariality and Argumentation.”
    Informal Logic  
  5. “Constructing the Inner Citadel: Recent Work on the Concept of Autonomy.”
    Ethics  
  6. “Autonomy and Personal History.”
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy  
  7. “Autonomy.”
    The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law Volume 3: Harm to Self
  8. “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric.”
    Communication Monographs  
  9. “Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy.”
    The Epistemology of Testimony
  10. “Transcending Our Conception of Argument in Light of Feminist Critiques.”
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  11. “The Womanization of Rhetoric.”
    Women’s Studies International Quarterly  
  12. Epistemic Paternalism: Conceptions, Justifications, and Implications
  13. “The Compliment of Rational Opposition: Disagreement, Adversariality, and Disputation.”
    Topoi  
  14. “Epistemic Paternalism: Communication Control in Law and Society.”
    Journal of Philosophy  
  15. “Belief, Values, and the Will.”
    Dialogue  
  16. The Philosophy of Argument
  17. A Practical Study of Argument
  18. “Reflections on Minimal Adversariality.”
    Informal Logic  
  19. Good Reasoning Matters! A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking
  20. Fallacies
  21. Mental Action and the Conscious Mind
  22. “The Moral Magic of Consent.”
    Legal Theory  
  23. “What’s Epistemic about Epistemic Paternalism?”
    Epistemic Autonomy
  24. Logical Self-Defense
  25. “The Concept of Autonomy.”
    American Philosophical Quarterly
  26. Argumentation
  27. “Disputing with Patients in Person-Centered Care: Ethical Aspects in Standard Care, Pedia…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  28. Philosophical Explanations
  29. “Two Concepts of Argument.”
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  30. “The Relation of Argument to Inference.”
    Argument, Inference and Dialectic  
  31. Argumentation
  32. “A Theory of Freedom of Expression.”
    Philosophy & Public Affairs
  33. “The Necessary Pluralism of Any Future History of Rhetoric.”
    Pre/Text
  34. “Why Should Educators Care about Argumentation?”
    Informal Logic
  35. “Asking before Arguing? Consent in Argumentation.”
    Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
  36. “Rational Persuasion as Paternalism: Rational Persuasion as Paternalism.”
    Philosophy & Public Affairs  
  37. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
  38. “Deciding to Believe.”
    Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972