Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2010 Perelman’s Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law Francis J. Mootz III Francis J. Mootz III William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada, Las Vegas Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 383–402. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0383 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Francis J. Mootz III; Perelman’s Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 383–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0383 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © Copyright 2010 The Pennsylvania State University The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.Copyright 2010 The Pennsylvania State UniversityThe Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: ARTICLES You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0383
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Advances in the History of Rhetoric
  2. Argumentation
  3. Advances in the History of Rhetoric

References (35)

  1. Allan, James. 2007. “Is You Is or Is You Ain't Hart's Baby? Epstein's Minimum Content of Natural Law.” Ratio …
  2. Aristotle. 1991. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Trans. and ed. George A. Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford U…
  3. Bineham, Jeffery L. 1995. “The Hermeneutic Medium.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (1): 1–16.
  4. Broekman, Jan M. 1986. “Justice as Equilibrium.” Law and Philosophy 5 (3): 369–91.
  5. Burns, Robert P. 1999. A Theory of the Trial. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Show all 35 →
  1. Burns, Tony. 2002. “Sophocles' Antigone and the History of the Concept of Natural Law.” Political Studies 50 …
  2. Burns, Tony. 2003. “The Tragedy of Slavery: Aristotle's Rhetoric and the History of the Concept of Natural La…
  3. Cicero. 1928. De re publica. Trans. Clinton Walker Keyes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Epstein, Richard. 2005. “The Not So Minimal Content of Natural Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2): …
  5. Finnis, John. 2005. “Foundations of Practical Reason Revisited.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 50:109–31.
  6. Foriers, Paul, and Chaïm Perelman. 1973–74. “Natural Law and Natural Rights.” In Dictionary of the History of…
  7. Foucault, Michel. 2007. “What Is Critique?” Trans. Lysa Hoshroth. The Politics of Truth. Ed. Sylvère Lotringe…
  8. Fuller, Lon L. 1969. The Morality of Law. Rev. ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  9. George, Robert P. 2007. “Natural Law.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 52:55–75.
  10. Goodrich, Peter. 1996. Law in the Courts of Love: Literature and Other Minor Jurisprudences. London: Routledge.
  11. Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Lisska, Anthony J. 1996. Aquinas' Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford Universit…
  13. Maciejewski, Jeffrey J. 2005. “Reason as a Nexus of Natural Law and Rhetoric.” Journal of Business Ethics 59 …
  14. Maciejewski, Jeffrey J. 2006. “Natural Law, Natural Rhetoric, and Rhetorical Perversions.” Proceedings of the…
  15. Macquarrie, John. 1991. “Rethinking Natural Law.” In Natural Law and Theology, ed. Charles E. Curran and Rich…
  16. Maneli, Mieczyslaw. 1986. “Perleman's Achievement Beyond Traditional Philosophy and Politics.” Law and Philos…
  17. Mootz, Francis J., III. 1999. “Law in Flux: Philosophical Hermeneutics, Legal Argumentation, and the Natural …
  18. Mootz, Francis J., III. 2006. Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Critical Legal Theory. Tuscaloosa: U…
  19. Mootz, Francis J., III. 2008a. “After Natural Law: A Hermeneutical Response to Law's Quandary.” Journal of La…
  20. Mootz, Francis J., III. 2008b. “Vico's ‘Ingenious Method’ and Legal Education.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 83 (3…
  21. Mootz, Francis J., III. 2009. “Vico and Imagination: An Ingenious Approach to Educating Lawyers with Semiotic…
  22. New American Standard Bible. 1995. La Habra, CA: Lockman Foundation.
  23. Perelman, Chaïm. 1979a. “The Rational and the Reasonable.” In Rationality To-day, ed. Theodore F. Geraets, 21…
  24. Perelman, Chaïm. 1979b. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and Its Applications. Trans. …
  25. Perelman, Chaïm. 1980. Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning. Trans. William Klubac…
  26. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John…
  27. Selzer, Jack. 1992. “More Meanings of Audience.” In A Rhetoric of Doing: Essays on Written Discourse in Honor…
  28. Smith, Steven D. 2004. Law's Quandary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  29. Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1987. Natural Law and Natural Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  30. Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1994. Oedipus at Fenway Park: What Rights Are and Why There Are Any. Cambridge, MA: Harvard…