Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic as Related to Argument

J. Anthony Blair University of Windsor

Abstract

AbstractThis article challenges the view that rhetoric, dialectic and logic are three perspectives on argument, relating respectively to its process, its procedure, and its product. It also questions the view that rhetorical arguments represent a distinctive type. It suggests that, as related to argument, rhetoric is the theory of arguments in speeches, dialectics the theory of arguments in conversations, and logic the theory of good reasoning in each.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2012-06-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0148
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectic…
  2. Goddu, Geoff. 2011. “Is ‘Argument’ Subject to the Product/Process Ambiguity?” Informal Logic 31 (2): 75–88.
  3. Horgan, Terry, and Mark Timmons. 2006. “Cognitivist Expressivism.” In Metaethics After Moore, ed. Terry Horga…
  4. Kock, Christian. 2007a. “Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate.” Informal Logic 27 (3): 233–47.
  5. Kock, Christian. 2007b. “The Norms of Legitimate Dissensus.” Informal Logic 27 (2): 179–96.
  6. Kock, Christian. 2009. “Choice Is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation.” Argumentation 2…
  7. Krabbe, Erik C. W. 2000. “Meeting in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and Dialectic.” Argumentation 14 (3): 205–17.
  8. Leff, Michael. 1993. “The Uses of Aristotle's Rhetoric in Contemporary American Scholarship.” Argumentation 7…
  9. Leff, Michael. 2000. “Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century.” Argumentation 14 (3): 241–54.
  10. O'Keefe, Daniel J. 1977. “Two Concepts of Argument.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 13: 121–28.
  11. Tindale, Christopher W. 2004. Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CrossRef global citation count: 16 View in citation network →