The Rhetorical Methodology of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Theory of Argumentation

Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2024

The Rhetorical Methodology of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Theory of Argumentation

Blake D. Scott KU Leuven

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s well-known influence on argumentation studies, it is striking that their theory of argumentation no longer stands out as a living project in the field. On the one hand, critics argue that their theory is inherently relativistic and therefore incapable of aiding argument evaluation. On the other hand, critics argue that, even as a descriptive theory, it fails to sufficiently justify its own systematic ambitions. This article addresses these dual concerns by returning to one of the most neglected yet most innovative aspects of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s theory of argumentation—its rhetorical methodology. Reconstructing two key aspects of this methodology in phenomenological terms, the author discusses that the theory of argumentation found in The New Rhetoric is a philosophically neutral framework for describing the already norm-laden practice of argumentation.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2024-06-28
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0001
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multilingual writers argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

Anderson et al. (2020)

Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Impli…

Philosophy & Rhetoric
Frank (2020)

The Origins of and Possible Futures for Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyte…

Philosophy & Rhetoric

Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓

(1993)

“The Empirical Relevance of Perelman’s New Rhetoric.”

Argumentation ↗
(2009)

“Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos.”

Argumentation ↗
(1962)

“Value Judgements, Justifications and Argumentation.”

Philosophy Today ↗
(2020)

“Argumentation and the Challenge of Time: Perelman, Temporality, and the Future of Argument.”

Argumentation ↗
(2024)

“What Makes an Argument Strong? Contrastivism in the New Rhetoric.”

Informal Logic ↗
(2001)

“Figure, Ground and Presence: A Phenomenology of Meaning in Rhetoric.”

Quarterly Journal of Speech ↗
(1992)

“The New Rhetoric’s Argument Schemes: A Rhetorical View of Practical Reasoning.”

Argumentation and Advocacy ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →