Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2024

The Rhetorical Methodology of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Theory of Argumentation

Blake D. Scott KU Leuven

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s well-known influence on argumentation studies, it is striking that their theory of argumentation no longer stands out as a living project in the field. On the one hand, critics argue that their theory is inherently relativistic and therefore incapable of aiding argument evaluation. On the other hand, critics argue that, even as a descriptive theory, it fails to sufficiently justify its own systematic ambitions. This article addresses these dual concerns by returning to one of the most neglected yet most innovative aspects of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s theory of argumentation—its rhetorical methodology. Reconstructing two key aspects of this methodology in phenomenological terms, the author discusses that the theory of argumentation found in The New Rhetoric is a philosophically neutral framework for describing the already norm-laden practice of argumentation.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-06-28
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument assessment
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (50) · 5 in this index

  1. (2008)
    “Perelmanian Universal Audience and the Epistemic Aspirations of Argument.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Anderson et al. (2020)
    Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Impli…
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. (2008)
    Dialogues de sourds: Traité de rhétorique antilogiques
  4. (2016)
    Renaissances de la rhétoriques: Perelman aujourd’hui
  5. (2006)
    “In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation.”
    Informal Logic
Show all 50 →
  1. (2012)
    Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair
  2. (2020)
    Translation and the Rediscovery of Rhetoric
  3. (2023)
    The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New …
  4. (2011)
    On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation
  5. (2013)
    Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom
  6. (2004)
    Perelman. Le renouveau de la rhétorique
  7. Frank (2020)
    The Origins of and Possible Futures for Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyte…
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  8. (2011)
    Les sens des lois. Histoire de l’interprétation et de la raison juridique
  9. (2003)
    Chaim Perelman
  10. (2019)
    Les Valeurs dans l’argumentation: L’héritage de Chaïm Perelman
  11. (1913/2014)
    Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Intro…
  12. (1976)
    “Presence in The New Rhetoric.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  13. Kienpointner (1993)
    The empirical relevance of Perelman's New Rhetoric
    Argumentation
  14. Leff (2009)
    Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos
    Argumentation
  15. (2005)
    “The Epistemological Theory of Argument—How and Why?”
    Informal Logic
  16. (2017)
    What Is Rhetoric?
  17. (2009)
    From Attention to Meaning: Explorations in Semiotics, Linguistics, and Rhetoric
  18. (1974)
    Le comique du discours
  19. (1979)
    “Les couples philosophiques. Une nouvelle approche.”
    Revue Internationale de Philosophie
  20. (1958)
  21. (1962)
    “Value Judgements, Justifications and Argumentation.”
    Philosophy Today  ↗
  22. (1969)
  23. (1975)
  24. (1976)
  25. (1976/1999)
    Logique juridique: Nouvelle rhétorique
  26. (1982)
    The Realm of Rhetoric
  27. (2012)
    Éthique et droit
  28. (1952)
    Rhétorique et philosophie. Pour une théorie de l’argumentation en philosophie
  29. (1958/2008)
    Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique
  30. (1969)
    The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
  31. (1947/2007)
    Existentialism Is a Humanism
  32. (2000)
    L’argumentation selon Perelman. Pour une raison au cœur de la rhétorique
  33. Scott (2020)
    Argumentation and the Challenge of Time: Perelman, Temporality, and the Future …
    Argumentation
  34. (2024)
    “What Makes an Argument Strong? Contrastivism in the New Rhetoric.”
    Informal Logic  ↗
  35. Forthcoming.
    The Rhetoricity of Philosophy: Audience in Perelman and Ricoeur after the Badiou-Cassin Debate
  36. (2020)
    Rigour and Reason: Essays in Honour of Hans Vilhelm Hansen
  37. (2001)
    “Figure, Ground and Presence: A Phenomenology of Meaning in Rhetoric.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  38. (2014)
    Handbook of Argumentation Theory
  39. (2003)
    A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
  40. (2001)
    Argumentation et droit. Introduction à la Nouvelle Rhétorique de Perelman
  41. (1996)
    Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
  42. (2008)
    Argumentation Schemes
  43. (1992)
    “The New Rhetoric’s Argument Schemes: A Rhetorical View of Practical Reasoning.”
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  44. (2021)
    Between Daily Routine and Violent Protest: Interpreting the Technicity of Action
  45. (2003)
    Husserl’s Phenomenology
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2025
    McKeon on Rhetoric and Technology: The Challenge of 0 (Zero) ↗
    Reingard Nethersole
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument assessment
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2023
    The State of UX Pedagogy ↗
    Philip B. Gallagher; Guiseppe Getto
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment technical communication book reviews
  3. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2023
    Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates ↗
    Divine N. Aboagye
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment race and writing public rhetoric affect and writing
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2022
    Orchestrating Difference: The Address of Composite Audiences as Pluralist Rhetoric ↗
    Tommy Bruhn
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument assessment
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2022
    Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates ↗
    Robert McDonald
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics argument assessment public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric