Abstract

AbstractBeing able to discriminate poorly justified from well justified arguments is necessary for informed citizenship. However, it is not known whether the ability to recognize argument strength generalizes across different types of arguments, and what cognitive factors predict this ability or these abilities. Drawing on the theory of argument schemes, we examined arguments from consequence, analogy, symptoms, and authority in order to cover all major types of arguments. A study (N = 278) on the general population in Finland indicated that the ability to discriminate between strong and weak arguments did not differ between these schemes. Argument strength discrimination ability correlated positively with analytic thinking dispositions promoting both quality and quantity of thinking, slightly positively with education, and negatively with overconfidence. It was unrelated to an intuitive thinking style, and to self-rated mental effort.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2024-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09620-x
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

References (82) · 3 in this index

  1. Argumentation
  2. Baron, J. 1985. Rationality and intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Baron, J. 1987. An hypothesis about the training of intelligence. In D. N. Perkins, J. Lochhead, & J. Bishop …
  4. Baron, J. 1993. Why teach thinking?–An essay. Applied Psychology 42: 191–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-…
    Applied Psychology  
  5. Baron, J. 1995. Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking and Reasoning 1(3): 221–235. https://doi.org…
    Thinking and Reasoning  
Show all 82 →
  1. Baron, J. 2019. Actively open-minded thinking and politics. Cognition 188: 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.co…
    Cognition  
  2. Baron, J., S. Scott, K. Fincher, and S. E. Metz. 2015. Who does the cognitive reflection test (sometimes) pre…
    Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition  
  3. Baron, J., Isler, O., & Yilmaz, O. (2023). Actively open-minded thinking and the political effects of its abs…
  4. Ben-Shachar, M., D. Lüdecke, and D. Makowski. 2020. effectsize: estimation of effect size indices and standar…
    Journal of Open Source Software  
  5. Bonnefon, J.-F. 2012. Utility conditionals as consequential arguments: a random sampling experiment. Thinking…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  6. Britt, M. A., T. Richter, and J.-F. Rouet. 2014. Scientific literacy: the role of goal-directed reading and e…
    Educational Psychologist  
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., R. E. Petty, J. Feinstein, and W. B. G. Jarvis. 1996. Dispositional differences in cognitive…
    Psychological Bulletin  
  8. Cohen, D. 2005. Arguments that backfire. In The uses of argument, eds. D. Hitchcock, and D. Farr. 58–65. OSSA.
  9. R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In R Foundation for Statistical C…
  10. Demir, Y., and J. Hornikx. 2022. Sensitivity to argument quality: adding turkish data to the question of cult…
    Communication Research Reports  
  11. Ennis, R. H., and E. E. Weir. 1985. The Ennis-Weir critical thinking essay test: an instrument for teaching a…
  12. Frederick, S. 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 25–42. htt…
    Journal of Economic Perspectives  
  13. Garssen, B. 2001. Argument schemes. In Crucial concepts in Argumentation Theory, eds. H. Frans, and van Eemer…
  14. Graff, G. 2003. Clueless in Academe. Yale University Press.
  15. Grootendorst, R., and F. H. van Eemeren. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical a…
  16. Hahn, U. 2020. Argument quality in real world argumentation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24: 363–374. https:…
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences  
  17. Haran, U., I. Ritov, and B. A. Mellers. 2013. The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquis…
    Judgment and Decision Making  
  18. Hitchcock, D., and J. Wagemans. 2011. The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes. In Keeping in Touch…
  19. Hoeken, H., R. Timmers, and P. J. Schellens. 2012. Arguing about desirable consequences: what constitutes a c…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  20. Hoeken, H., E. Šorm, and P. J. Schellens. 2014. Arguing about the likelihood of consequences: Laypeople’s cri…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  21. Hoeken, H., J. Hornikx, and Y. Linders. 2020. The importance and use of normative criteria to manipulate argu…
    Journal of Advertising  
  22. Hornikx, J., and H. Hoeken. 2007. Cultural differences in the persuasiveness of evidence types and evidence q…
    Communication Monographs  
  23. Hornikx, J., A. Weerman, and H. Hoeken. 2022. An exploratory test of an intuitive evaluation method of percei…
  24. Janssen, E. M., W. Meulendijks, T. Mainhard, P. P. J. L. Verkoeijen, A. E. G. Heijltjes, L. M. van Peppen, an…
    Teaching and Teacher Education  
  25. Johnson, R. H., and J. A. Blair. 1977. Logical self-defense. McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
  26. Klement, K. C. (n/d). Propositional Logic. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttps://iep.utm.edu/.
  27. Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., and S. V. Rouse. 2016. The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectu…
    Journal of Personality Assessment  
  28. Kuhn, D. 1991. The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
  29. Kuhn, D., and A. Modrek. 2017. Do reasoning limitations undermine discourse? Thinking & Reasoning 24: 97–116.…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  30. Larson, A. A., M. A. Britt, and C. A. Kurby. 2009. Improving students’ evaluation of informal arguments. Jour…
    Journal of Experimental Education  
  31. McCrudden, M. T., and A. Barnes. 2016. Differences in student reasoning about belief-relevant arguments: a mi…
    Metacognition and Learning  
  32. Test theory: a unified treatment
  33. Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
  34. Münchov, H., T. Richter, S. von der Mühlen, and S. Schmid. 2019. The ability to evaluate arguments in scienti…
    British Journal of Educational Psychology  
  35. Nickerson, R. S., D. N. Perkins, and E. E. Smith. 2014. The teaching of thinking. Routledge. (Original work p…
  36. Norris, P., and S. Epstein. 2011. An experiential thinking style: its facets and relations with objective and…
    Journal of Personality  
  37. Nussbaum, E. M., and L. D. Bendixen. 2003. Approaching and avoiding arguments: the role of epistemological be…
    Contemporary Educational Psychology  
  38. O’Keefe, D. J. 2012. The argumentative structure of some persuasive appeal variations. In van Eemeren, F., Ga…
  39. Ottati, V., and C. Stern. eds. in press. Divided: open-mindedness and dogmatism in a polarized workd. Oxford …
  40. Paas, F. G. W. C. 1992. Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a …
    Journal of Educational Psychology  
  41. Perkins, D. 1995. Outsmarting IQ: the emerging science of learnable intelligence. Free Press.
  42. Perkins, D. 2019. Learning to reason: the influence of instruction, prompts and scaffolding, metacognitive kn…
    Judgment and Decision Making  
  43. Perkins, D., E. Jay, and S. Tishman. 1993. New conceptions of thinking: from ontology to education. Education…
    Educational Psychologist  
  44. Petty, R. E., P. Briñol, C. Loersch, and M. J. McCaslin. 2009. The need for Cognition. In Handbook of individ…
  45. Revelle, W. 2021. psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. In (Version R …
  46. Revelle, W. 2022. An introduction to psychometric theory with applications in R. https://personality-project.…
  47. Revelle, W., and D. M. Condon. 2019. Reliability from α to ω: a tutorial. Psychological Assessment 31: 1395–1…
    Psychological Assessment  
  48. Reznitskaya, A., and R. C. Anderson. 2006. Analyzing argumentation in rich, natural contexts. Informal Logic …
    Informal Logic  
  49. Argumentation
  50. Shaw, V. F. 1996. The cognitive processes in informal reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning 2: 51–80. https://doi.o…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  51. Stanovich, K. E. 1999. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Asso…
  52. Stanovich, K. E. 2009. What intelligence tests miss. The psychology of rational thought. Yale University press.
  53. Stanovich, K. E. 2018. Miserliness in human cognition: the interaction of detection, override and mindware. T…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  54. Stanovich, K. E., and R. F. West. 1997. Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in…
    Journal of Educational Psychology  
  55. Stanovich, K. E., and R. F. West. 1998. Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental P…
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General  
  56. Stanovich, K. E., R. F. West, and M. E. Toplak. 2013. Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Curre…
    Current Directions in Psychological Science  
  57. Stupple, E. J. N., F. A. Maratosa, J. Elander, T. E. Hunt, K. Y. F. Cheung, and A. B. Aubeeluck. 2017. Develo…
    Thinking Skills and Creativity  
  58. Svedholm, A. M., and M. Lindeman. 2013. The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory …
    British Journal of Psychology  
  59. Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Hietanen, M. (submitted). On being drawn to different types of arguments. A mouse…
  60. Swami, V., M. Voracek, S. Stieger, U. S. Tran, and A. Furnham. 2014. Analytic thinking reduces belief in cons…
    Cognition  
  61. Taber, C. S., and M. Lodge. 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journ…
    American Journal of Political Science  
  62. Thompson, V. A., and S. C. Johnson. 2014. Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasonin…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  63. Thompson, V. A., G. Pennycook, D. Trippas, and J. S. B. T. Evans. 2018. Do smart people have better intuition…
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General  
  64. Thomson, K. S., and D. M. Oppenheimer. 2016. Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test…
    Judgment and Decision Making  
  65. Toplak, M., R. West, and K. E. Stanovich. 2014. Assessing miserly information processing: an expansion of the…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  66. van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialecti…
  67. van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical a…
  68. van Eemeren, F. H., B. Garssen, E. C. W. Krabbe, Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. Verheij, B., and J. H. M. Wagemans. …
  69. Voss, J. F., and M. L. Means. 1991. Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning & Instructi…
    Learning & Instruction  
  70. Voss, J. F., and J. A. Van Dyke. 2011. Argumentation in psychology: background comments. Discourse Processes …
    Discourse Processes  
  71. Walton, D., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press.
  72. Weinstock, and M. A. Cronin. 2003. The everyday production of knowledge: individual differences in epistemolo…
    Applied Cognitive Psychology  
  73. Wilkinson, I. A. G., A. Reznitskaya, K. Bourdage, J. Oyler, M. Glina, R. Drewry, M.-Y. Kim, and K. Nelson. 20…
    Language and Education  
  74. Written Communication
  75. Wolfe, C. R., and M. A. Britt. 2008. The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation. Thinking & Reason…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  76. Zagrebski, L. 1996. Virtues of the mind. Cambridge University Press.
  77. Zarefsky, D. 2019. The practice of argumentation: effective reasoning in communication. Cambridge University Press.