Pathos in Natural Language Argumentation: Emotional Appeals and Reactions

Barbara Konat Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań ; Ewelina Gajewska Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań ; Wiktoria Rossa Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, we present a model of pathos, delineate its operationalisation, and demonstrate its utility through an analysis of natural language argumentation. We understand pathos as an interactional persuasive process in which speakers are performing pathos appeals and the audience experiences emotional reactions. We analyse two strategies of such appeals in pre-election debates: pathotic Argument Schemes based on the taxonomy proposed by Walton et al. (Argumentation schemes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008), and emotion-eliciting language based on psychological lexicons of emotive words (Wierzba in Behav Res Methods 54:2146–2161, 2021). In order to match the appeals with possible reactions, we collect real-time social media reactions to the debates and apply sentiment analysis (Alswaidan and Menai in Knowl Inf Syst 62:2937–2987, 2020) method to observe emotion expressed in language. The results point to the importance of pathos analysis in modern discourse: speakers in political debates refer to emotions in most of their arguments, and the audience in social media reacts to those appeals using emotion-expressing language. Our results show that pathos is a common strategy in natural language argumentation which can be analysed with the support of computational methods.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-024-09631-2
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Show all 7 →
  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
Also cites 52 works outside this index ↓
  1. Alessia, D., F. Ferri, P. Grifoni, and T. Guzzo. 2015. Approaches, tools and applications for sentiment analy…
    International Journal of Computer Applications  
  2. Alsaedi, A., P. Brooker, F. Grasso, and S. Thomason. 2022. Improving social emotion prediction with reader …
  3. Alswaidan, N., and M.E.B. Menai. 2020. A survey of state-of-the-art approaches for emotion recognition in tex…
    Knowledge and Information Systems  
  4. Artetxe, M., and H. Schwenk. 2019. Massively multilingual sentence embeddings for zero-shot cross-lingual tra…
    Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics  
  5. How to do things with words
  6. Berengueres, J., and D. Castro. 2017. Differences in emoji sentiment perception between readers and writers. …
  7. Boucher, J., and C.E. Osgood. 1969. The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior …
    Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior  
  8. Bourse, S. 2019. Conjuring up terror and tears: the evocative and persuasive power of loaded words in the pol…
    Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology  
  9. Buechel, S., and U. Hahn. 2017. EmoBank: Studying the impact of annotation perspective and representation for…
  10. Cabrio, E., and S. Villata. 2018. The SEEMPAD dataset for emphatic and persuasive argumentation. In E. Cabrio…
  11. Chatterjee, A., K.N. Narahari, M. Joshi, and P. Agrawal. 2019. SemEval-2019 task 3: EmoContext contextual emo…
  12. Cigada, S. 2019. Emotions in argumentative narration: the case of the Charlie Hebdo attack. Informal Logic 39…
    Informal Logic  
  13. Demszky, D., D. Movshovitz-Attias, J. Ko, A. Cowen, G. Nemade, and S. Ravi. 2020. GoEmotions: a dataset of fi…
  14. Devlin, J., M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. 2019. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transforme…
  15. Diakopoulos, N.A., and D.A Shamma. 2010. Characterizing debate performance via aggregated Twitter sentiment. …
  16. Argumentation theory: a pragma-dialectical perspective
  17. Handbook of cognition and emotion
  18. Eugenio, B.D., and M. Glass. 2004. The kappa statistic: a second look. Computational linguistics 30 (1): 95–101.
    Computational linguistics  
  19. Gilbert, M.A. 2004. Emotion, argumentation and informal logic. Informal Logic. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v2…
    Informal Logic  
  20. Gordon, M.L., K. Zhou, K. Patel, T. Hashimoto, and M.S. Bernstein. 2021. The disagreement deconvolution: brin…
  21. Greco, S., S. Cigada, and C. Jermini-Martinez Soria. 2022. The naming of emotions in dispute mediators’ strat…
    Text & Talk  
  22. Hidey, C., E. Musi, A. Hwang, S. Muresan, and K. McKeown. 2017. Analyzing the semantic types of claims and p…
  23. Hinton, M., and A. Budzyńska-Daca. 2019. A comparative study of political communication in televised pre-elec…
    Research in Language  
  24. Jose, R., and V.S Chooralil. 2015. Prediction of election result by enhanced sentiment analysis on Twitter da…
  25. Kissler, J., R. Assadollahi, and C. Herbert. 2006. Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing:…
    Progress in brain research  
  26. Kocoń, J., A. Figas, M. Gruza, D. Puchalska, T. Kajdanowicz, and P. Kazienko. 2021. Offensive, aggressive, an…
    Information Processing & Management  
  27. Computational models of argument
  28. Lindahl, A., L. Borin, and J. Rouces. 2019. Towards assessing argumentation annotation-a first step. In Proc…
  29. Lukin, S., P. Anand, M. Walker, and S. Whittaker. 2017. Argument strength is in the eye of the beholder: Aud…
  30. Miłkowski, P., M. Gruza, K. Kanclerz, P. Kazienko, D. Grimling, and J. Kocoń. 2021. Personal bias in predicti…
  31. Mohammad, S., F. Bravo-Marquez, M. Salameh, and S. Kiritchenko. 2018. Semeval-2018 task 1: affect in tweets. …
  32. Plantin, C. 2019. Tense arguments: questions, exclamations, emotions. Informal Logic 39 (4): 347–371.
    Informal Logic  
  33. Plutchik, R. 2001. The nature of emotions: human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may expla…
    American Scientist  
  34. Russell, J.A. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (6): 1161.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  35. Saganowski, S., Komoszyńska, J., M. Behnke, B. Perz, D. Kunc, B. Klich, and P. Kazienko. 2022. Emognition da…
    Scientific Data  
  36. Santibáñez, C. 2010. Metaphors and argumentation: the case of Chilean parliamentarian media participation. Jo…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  37. Saravia, E., H.-C.T. Liu, Y.-H. Huang, J. Wu, and Y.-S Chen. 2018. Carer: contextualized affect representa…
  38. Expression and meaning: studies in the theory of speech acts
  39. Stede, M. 2020. Automatic argumentation mining and the role of stance and sentiment. Journal of Argumentation…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  40. Taboada, M., J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, K. Voll, and M. Stede. 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analys…
    Computational Linguistics  
  41. Van Haaften, T. 2019. Argumentative strategies and stylistic devices. Informal Logic 39 (4): 301–328.
    Informal Logic  
  42. Villata, S., E. Cabrio, I. Jraidi, S. Benlamine, M. Chaouachi, C. Frasson, and F. Gandon. 2017. Emotions and …
    Argument & Computation  
  43. Visser, J., B. Konat, R. Duthie, M. Koszowy, K. Budzynska, and C. Reed. 2020. Argumentation in the 2016 US pr…
    Language Resources and Evaluation  
  44. Walton, D. 2007. Evaluating practical reasoning. Synthese 157 (2): 197–240.
    Synthese  
  45. Media argumentation: dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric
  46. Walton, D. 2010. The structure of argumentation in health product messages. Argument & Computation 1 (3): 179–198.
    Argument & Computation  
  47. Argumentation schemes
  48. Warriner, A.B., and V. Kuperman. 2015. Affective biases in English are bi-dimensional. Cognition and Emotion …
    Cognition and Emotion  
  49. Wierzba, M., M. Riegel, J. Kocoń, P. Milkowski, A. Janz, K. Klessa, et al. 2021. Emotion norms for 6000 Polis…
    Behavior Research Methods  
  50. Wierzba, M., M. Riegel, M. Wypych, K. Jednoróg, P. Turnau, A. Grabowska, and A. Marchewka. 2015. Basic emotio…
    PLOS ONE  
  51. Wolf, T., L. Debut, V. Sanh, J. Chaumond, C. Delangue, A. Moi, and A.M. Rush. 2020. Transformers: State-of-th…
  52. Yang, C., K.H.-Y. Lin, and H.-H. Chen. 2009. Writer meets reader: emotion analysis of social media from both …