Journal
Argumentation
Published
2021-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-020-09522-2
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. Expertise and Decision Support
  2. Fanelli, D. 2010. “Positive” Results Increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLoS One 5 (4): e10068.
    PLoS One  
  3. Fanelli, D., and W. Glänzel. 2013. Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLoS One 8 (6): e66938.
    PLoS One  
  4. Hardwig, J. 1991. The Role of Trust in Knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy 88 (12): 693–708.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  5. Hinton, M.D. 2015. Mizrahi and Seidel: Experts in Confusion. Informal Logic 35 (4): 539–554.
    Informal Logic  
  6. Mizrahi, M. 2013. Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Weak Arguments. Informal Logic 33 (1): 57–79.
    Informal Logic  
  7. Mizrahi, M. 2016. Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Still Weak: A Reply to Seidel. Informal Logic 36 (2):…
    Informal Logic  
  8. Rachlinski, J.J., C. Guthrie, and A.J. Wistrich. 2011. Probable Cause, Probability, and Hindsight. Journal of…
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies  
  9. Seidel, M. 2014. Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Sc…
    Informal Logic  
  10. Seidel, M. 2016. The Real Struggle: An Objective Notion of Expertise? Informal Logic 36 (2): 253–264.
    Informal Logic  
  11. Argumentation Schemes