Arguments from Expert Opinion and Persistent Bias

Moti Mizrahi Florida Institute of Technology
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2018-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-017-9434-x
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Export

Citation Context

References (97) · 5 in this index

  1. The architecture of cognition
  2. Armenakis, A., K.W. Mossholder, and S.G. Harris. 1990. Diagnostic bias in organizational consultation. Omega:…
    Omega: International Journal of Management Science  
  3. Fundamentals of clinical research: Bridging medicine, statistics and operations
  4. Blanchflower, D. 2016. Experts get it wrong again by failing to predict Trump victory. The Guardian, 9 Novemb…
  5. Bond, G.D. 2008. Deception detection expertise. Law and Human Behavior 32: 339–351.
    Law and Human Behavior  
Show all 97 →
  1. Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies
  2. Brailey, K., J.J. Vasterling, and J.J. Franks. 2001. Memory of psychodiagnostic information: Biases and effec…
    American Journal of Psychology  
  3. Calikli, G., and A. Bener. 2015. Empirical analysis of factors affecting confirmation bias levels of software…
    Software Quality Journal  
  4. Canal-Bruland, R., and M. Schmidt. 2009. Response bias in judging deceptive movements. Acta Psychologica 130:…
    Acta Psychologica  
  5. Chen, Z., and S. Kemp. 2012. Lie hard: The effect of self-assessments on academic promotion decisions. Journa…
    Journal of Economic Psychology  
  6. Chung, J.S., A. Senior, O. Vinyals, and A. Zisserman. 2016. Lip reading sentences in the wild. arXiv:1611.053…
  7. Critical thinking unleashed
  8. ABC of clinical reasoning
  9. Craig, J.C., G.J. Williams, M. Jones, M. Codarini, P. Macaskill, A. Hayen, et al. 2010. The accuracy of clini…
    BMJ  
  10. Objectivity
  11. DeCarlo, T., T. Roy, and M. Barone. 2015. How sales manager experience and historical data trends affect deci…
    European Journal of Marketing  
  12. Devitt, M. 2015. Relying on intuitions: Where cappelen and deutsch go wrong. Inquiry 58(7–8): 669–699.
    Inquiry  
  13. Science, policy, and the value-free ideal
  14. Handbook of marketing
  15. Englich, B., T. Mussweiler, and F. Strack. 2005. The last word in court—A hidden disadvantage for the defense…
    Law and Human Behavior  
  16. Fahsing, I., and K. Ask. 2016. The making of an expert detective: the role of experience in English and Norwe…
    Psychology, Crime and Law  
  17. Ganzach, Y. 1997. Theory and configurality in clinical judgments of expert and novice psychologists. Journal …
    Journal of Applied Psychology  
  18. Gegenfurtner, A., E. Lehtinen, and R. Säljö. 2011. Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizatio…
    Educational Psychology Review  
  19. Argumentation
  20. Research in psychology: Methods and design
  21. Argumentation
  22. Goodwin, J. 2001. Cicero’s authority. Philosophy and Rhetoric 34: 38–60.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  23. Argumentation
  24. Griffin, T.D., B.D. Jee, and J. Wiley. 2009. The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. M…
    Memory and Cognition  
  25. Griffin, D., and A. Tversky. 1992. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psy…
    Cognitive Psychology  
  26. How doctors think
  27. Guthrie, C., J. Rachlinski, and A. Wistrich. 2001. Inside the judicial mind. Cornell Law Review 86: 777–830.
    Cornell Law Review
  28. Guthrie, C., J. Rachlinski, and A. Wistrich. 2007. Blinking on the bench: how judges decide cases. Cornell La…
    Cornell Law Review
  29. Guthrie, C., J. Rachlinski, and A. Wistrich. 2011. Probable cause, probability, and hindsight. Journal of Emp…
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies  
  30. Herppich, S., J. Wittwer, M. Nuckles, and A. Renkl. 2013. Does it make a difference? investigating the assess…
    Journal of Experimental Education  
  31. Hinds, P.J. 1999. The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of no…
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
  32. Hinton, M. 2015. Mizrahi and seidel: Experts in confusion. Informal Logic 35: 539–554.
    Informal Logic  
  33. Holden, M.P., N.S. Newcombe, I. Resnick, and T.F. Shipley. 2016. Seeing like a geologist: Bayesian use of exp…
    Cognitive Science  
  34. Hooke, R. 1664. Micrographia. London. https://ceb.nlm.nih.gov/proj/ttp/flash/hooke/hooke.html .
  35. Epistemology: Contemporary readings
  36. IBM. 2013. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: IBM Watson helps fight cancer with evidence-based diagnosi…
  37. Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory
  38. Kahneman, D. 1991. Judgment and decision making: A personal view. Psychological Science 2: 142–145.
    Psychological Science  
  39. Kaufmann, E., U. Reips, and W. Wittmann. 2013. A critical meta-analysis of lens model studies in human judgme…
    PLoS ONE  
  40. Kidd, J.B. 1970. The utilization of subjective probabilities in production planning. Acta Psychologica 34: 338–347.
    Acta Psychologica  
  41. Kitcher, P. 2001. Real realism: The Galilean strategy. Philosophical Review 110: 151–197.
    Philosophical Review  
  42. Kononenko, I. 2001. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: History, state of the art and perspective. Artifi…
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine  
  43. Krems, J.F., and C. Zierer. 1994. Are experts immune to cognitive bias? The dependence of confirmation bias o…
    Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie
  44. The road since structure: Philosophical essays, 1970–1993, with an autobiographical interview
  45. Lai, M. 2015. Giraffe: Using deep reinforcement learning to play chess. arXiv:1509.01549 [cs.AI].
  46. Langenburg, G., C. Champod, and P. Wertheim. 2009. Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the v…
    Journal of Forensic Sciences  
  47. Lanzilotti, R., C. Ardito, M.F. Costabile, and A. De Angeli. 2011. Do patterns help novice evaluators? A comp…
    International Journal of Human–Computer Studies  
  48. Applying quantitative bias analysis to epidemiologic data
  49. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts
  50. Leventhal, L., B. Teasley, and D. Rohlman. 1994. Analyses of factors related to positive test bias in softwar…
    International Journal of Human–Computer Studies  
  51. Argumentation
  52. Locke, J. 1975. In An essay concerning human understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  53. Lusted, L. B. 1977. A study of the efficacy of diagnostic radiologic procedures: Final report on diagnostic e…
  54. Blinding as a solution to bias
  55. Makary, M.A. 2016. Medical error—The third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 353: i2139.
    BMJ  
  56. McGlone, M.S., D. Kobrynowicz, and R.B. Alexander. 2005. A certain Je ne sais quoi—Verbalization bias in eval…
    Human Communication Research
  57. McNeil, B.J., S.J. Pauker, H.C. Sox, and A. Tversky. 1982. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative …
    New England Journal of Medicine  
  58. Mendel, R., E. Traut-Mattausch, E. Jonas, S. Leucht, J.M. Kane, K. Maino, W. Kissling, and J. Hamann. 2011. C…
    Psychological Medicine  
  59. Mizrahi, M. 2010. Take my advice—I am not following it: Ad Hominem arguments as legitimate rebuttals to appea…
    Informal Logic  
  60. Mizrahi, M. 2013. Why arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. Informal Logic 33: 57–79.
    Informal Logic  
  61. Mizrahi, M. 2016. Why arguments from expert opinion are still weak: A reply to Seidel. Informal Logic 36: 238–252.
    Informal Logic  
  62. Mnih, V., K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. Graves, I. Antonoglou, D. Wiestra, and M. Riedmiller. 2013. Playing A…
  63. Cognition and rationality in negotiation
  64. Northcraft, G.B., and M.A. Neale. 1987. Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment persp…
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes  
  65. Nuzzo, R. 2015. Fooling ourselves. Nature 526: 182–195.
    Nature  
  66. Oskamp, S. 1965. Overconfidence in case-study judgments. The Journal of Consulting Psychology 29: 261–265.
    The Journal of Consulting Psychology  
  67. Nudge and the law: A European perspective
  68. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making
  69. Posavac, S., F.R. Kardes, D.M. Sanbonmatsu, and G.J. Fitzsimons. 2005. Blissful insularity: When brands are j…
    Marketing Letters  
  70. Put, K., M. Baldo, A.M. Cravo, J. Wagemans, and W.F. Helsen. 2013. Experts in offside decision making learn t…
    Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology  
  71. Ramos, J.G., B. Perondi, R.D. Dias, L.C. Miranda, C. Cohen, C.R. Carvalho, I.T. Velasco, and D.N. Forte. 2016…
    Critical Care  
  72. Ryle, G. 1946. Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46: 1–16.
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  73. Schwitzgebel, E., and F. Cushman. 2012. Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in prof…
    Mind and Language  
  74. Schwitzgebel, E., and F. Cushman. 2015. Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise, a…
    Cognition  
  75. Seidel, M. 2014. Throwing the baby out with the water: From reasonably scrutinizing authorities to rampant sc…
    Informal Logic  
  76. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life
  77. Shieber, J. 2009. Locke on testimony: A reexamination. History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (1): 21–41.
    History of Philosophy Quarterly
  78. Siegel, R. 2016. 20 years later, humans still no match for computers on the chessboard. NPR, 24 Oct 2016. htt…
  79. Staël von Holstein, C.A.S. 1972. Probabilistic forecasting: An experiment related to the stock market. Organi…
    Organizational Behavior and Human Performance  
  80. Ste-Marie, D.M., and T.D. Lee. 1991. Prior processing effects on gymnastic judging. Journal of Experimental P…
    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition  
  81. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.
    Science  
  82. The Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law
  83. Argumentation
  84. Intelligent decision support in process environments
  85. The place of emotion in argument
  86. Walton, D. 2006. Examination dialogue: A framework for critically questioning an expert opinion. Journal of P…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  87. Argumentation schemes
  88. Walton, D. 2014. On a razor’s edge: Evaluating arguments from expert opinion. Argument and Computation 5: 139–159.
    Argument and Computation  
  89. Argument evaluation and evidence
  90. Waylen, A.E., M.S. Horswill, J.L. Alexander, and F.P. McKenna. 2004. Do expert drivers have a reduced illusio…
    Transportation Research Part F—Traffic Psychology and Behavior  
  91. Practical predictive analytics and decisioning systems for medicine: Informatics accuracy…
  92. Wöllner, C., and F.J.A. Deconinck. 2013. Gender recognition depends on type of movement and motor skill. Anal…
    Acta Psychologica