Cited by in this index (2)

1. Araszkiewicz et al. (2024)
   The Structure of Arguments from Deontic Authority and How to Successfully Attack Them
   Argumentation
2. Zenker et al. (2024)
   Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
   Argumentation

Cites in this index (8)

1. Yu et al. (2020)
   Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
   Argumentation
2. Mizrahi (2018)
   Arguments from Expert Opinion and Persistent Bias
   Argumentation
3. Koszowy et al. (2014)
   The Lvov–Warsaw School as a Source of Inspiration for Argumentation Theory
   Argumentation
4. Wagemans (2011)
   The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
   Argumentation
5. Zenker (2011)
   Experts and Bias: When is the Interest-Based Objection to Expert Argumentation Sound?
   Argumentation

Show all 8 →

1. Blair (2001)
   Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development
   Argumentation
2. Goodwin (1998)
   Forms of Authority and the Real Ad Verecundiam
   Argumentation
3. Walton (1989)
   Reasoned use of expertise in argumentation
   Argumentation

Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓

1. Arnauld, A., & Nicole, P. 1996. Logic or the Art of Thinking. ed. J. V. Buroker. New York: Cambridge Universi…
    ↗
2. JL Austin (1956)
   Austin, J.L. 1956. A plea for excuses: The presidential address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 1–30.
   Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  ↗
3. M Koszowy (2019)
   Koszowy, M., and D. Walton. 2019. Epistemic and deontic authority in the argumentum ad verecundiam. Pragmatic…
   Pragmatics and Society  ↗
4. M Mizrahi (2013)
   Mizrahi, M. 2013. Why arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. Informal Logic 33: 57–79.
   Informal Logic  ↗
5. JR Searle (1979)
   Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts
    ↗
6. FP Shecaira (2016)
   Shecaira, F.P. 2016. How to disagree about argument schemes. Informal Logic 36: 500–522.
   Informal Logic  ↗
7. FH van Eemeren (2014)
   Handbook of argumentation theory
    ↗
8. D Walton (2017)
   Walton, D., and M. Koszowy. 2017. Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation …
   AI & Society  ↗
9. D Walton (2003)
   anyone who has a view. Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
    ↗
10. D Walton (2008)
    Argumentation schemes
     ↗
11. P Weingart (1999)
    Weingart, P. 1999. Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics. Scien…
    Science and Public Policy  ↗
12. RS Woolhouse (1970)
    Woolhouse, R.S. 1970. John locke and the port royal logic. Notes and Queries 17: 257–259.
    Notes and Queries  ↗