Argumentation Jun 2024 Open Access

The Structure of Arguments from Deontic Authority and How to Successfully Attack Them

Michał Araszkiewicz Jagiellonian University ; Marcin Koszowy Warsaw University of Technology

Abstract

AbstractDespite increasing interest in studying arguments from deontic authority of the general form “(1) $$\delta$$ δ is a deontic authority in institution $$\varOmega$$ Ω ; (2) according to $$\delta$$ δ , I should do $$\alpha$$ α , C: therefore, (3) I should do $$\alpha$$ α ”, the state of the art models are not capable of grasping their complexity. The existing sets of critical questions assigned to this argumentation scheme seem to conflate two problems: whether a person is subject to an authority of an institution in the first place and whether the command issued within the context of a particular institution is eventually binding. For this reason, we introduce (1) a set of Basic Critical Questions to scrutinize the former issue, and (2) a set of more detailed questions related to specific features, also referred to as “parameters”, of institutional environments (Intra-Institutional Critical Questions). We identify major elements of institutional environments in which authoritative utterances are made and the crucial parameters of arguments from deontic authority. The selected evidence from the decisions of the Polish Supreme Administrative Court helps us show how these parameters may be used to reconstruct subtypes of this argument scheme, with their associated sets of critical questions. In specific institutional contexts, such detailed schemes are capable of grasping the complexity of appeals to deontic authority and thus should be used rather than general schemes. The reconstruction of argumentation schemes with critical questions shows how particular arguments may successfully be attacked.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2024-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09623-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Zenker et al. (2023)
    Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions
    Argumentation
  2. Yaskorska-Shah (2021)
    Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method…
    Argumentation
  3. Visser et al. (2021)
    Annotating Argument Schemes
    Argumentation
  4. Yu et al. (2020)
    Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
    Argumentation
  5. Kacprzak et al. (2014)
    Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies
    Argumentation
Show all 7 →
  1. Wagemans (2011)
    The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
    Argumentation
  2. Rocci (2008)
    Modality and its Conversational Backgrounds in the Reconstruction of Argumentation
    Argumentation
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. Hitchcock, D., and J. Wagemans. 2011. The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes. In E.T. Feteris, B.…
     ↗
  2. M Koszowy (2017)
    Koszowy, M., and D. Walton. 2017. Profiles of dialogue for repairing faults in arguments from expert opinion.…
    Logic and Logical Philosophy  ↗
  3. M Koszowy (2019)
    Koszowy, M., and D. Walton. 2019. Epistemic and deontic authority in the argumentum Ad Verecundiam. Pragmatic…
    Pragmatics and Society  ↗
  4. M Lewiński (2022)
    Lewiński, M. 2022. Challenging authority with argumentation: The pragmatics of arguments from and to authorit…
    Languages  ↗
  5. S Parsons (2014)
    Parsons, S., K. Atkinson, Z. Li, P. McBurney, E. Sklar, M. Singh, K. Haigh, K. Levitt, and J. Rowe. 2014. Arg…
    Argument & Computation  ↗
  6. J Raz (1979)
    The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality
     ↗
  7. A Rocci (2017)
    Modality in Argumentation
     ↗
  8. D Walton (2015)
    Walton, D., and F. Macagno. 2015. A classification system for argumentation schemes. Argument & Computation 6…
    Argument & Computation  ↗
  9. D Walton (2008)
    Argumentation Schemes
     ↗
  10. D Walton (2021)
    Statutory Interpretation: Pragmatics and Argumentation
     ↗
  11. J Wróblewski (1992)
    The Judicial Application of Law
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  2. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗
    Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
    argument artificial intelligence
  3. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Apr 2026
    Psyche or Soma? ↗
    Samantha Rippetoe
    rhetorical criticism argument archival research
  4. Argumentation Mar 2026
    The Recursive Argument Structure Reconsidered ↗
    Shiyang Yu
    argument
  5. Argumentation Mar 2026
    Between Rationality and Self-protection: Student-Constructed Arguments on Fast Food Consumption and Antibiotic Overuse as Public Health Issues in Biology Education ↗
    Eliza Rybska; Michał Klichowski; Costas P. Constantinou; Barbara Jankowiak
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument qualitative research