Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry

Axel Gelfert National University of Singapore
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9218-7
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. Gelfert, A. 2010. Reconsidering the role of inference to the best explanation in the epistemology of testimon…
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science  
  2. Gelfert, A. 2011. Steps to an ecology of knowledge: continuity and change in the genealogy of knowledge. Epis…
    Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology  
  3. Relying on others: An essay in epistemology
  4. Knowledge in a social world
  5. Goldman, A. 2001. Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85–110.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  6. Hardwig, J. 1985. Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy 82: 335–349.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  7. Hardwig, J. 1991. The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy 88: 693–708.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  8. Social epistemology
  9. Knowledge by agreement: The programme of communitarian epistemology
  10. Lewis, D. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359.
    Journal of Philosophical Logic  
  11. Olmos, P. 2008. Situated practices of testimony: A rhetorical approach. Theoria 61: 57–68.
    Theoria  
  12. Scharp, K.A. 2005. Scorekeeping in a defective language game. Pragmatics & Cognition 13: 203–226.
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  13. Scholz, O.R. 2009. Experts: what they are and how we recognize them—A discussion of Alvin Goldman’s views. Gr…
    Grazer Philosophische Studien