Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts

Jean Goodwin Iowa State University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9219-6
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Show all 8 →
  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. Ceccarelli, L. 2011. Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric and …
    Rhetoric and Public Affairs  
  2. Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Soci…
    Social Studies of Science  
  3. Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2003. King Canute meets the beach boys: Responses to the third wave. Social Studie…
    Social Studies of Science  
  4. Rethinking expertise
  5. Collins, H., M. Weinel, and R. Evans. 2010. The politics and policy of the third wave: New technologies and s…
    Critical Policy Studies  
  6. Evans, R., and A. Plows. 2007. Listening without prejudice? Re-discovering the value of the disinterested cit…
    Social Studies of Science  
  7. Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry
  8. Goldman, A.I. 2001. Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85–110.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  9. Goodwin, J. 2001. Cicero’s authority. Philosophy and Rhetoric 34: 38–60.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  10. Goodwin, J. 2007. Argument has no function. Informal Logic 27: 69–90.
    Informal Logic  
  11. Guston, D.H. 1999. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the Office of Techno…
    Social Studies of Science  
  12. Hardwig, J. 1985. Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy 82: 335–349.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  13. Controversy, confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
  14. Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis
  15. Kutrovátz, G. 2010. Trust in experts: Contextual patterns of warranted epistemic dependence. Balkan Journal o…
    Balkan Journal of Philosophy  
  16. Paroske, M. 2009. Deliberating international science policy controversies: Uncertainty and AIDS in South Afri…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  17. Priest, S.H., H. Bonfadelli, and M. Rusanen. 2003. The “trust gap” hypothesis: Predicting support for biotech…
    Risk Analysis  
  18. Shapiro, S.P. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology 93: 623–658.
    American Journal of Sociology  
  19. Tindale, Ch.W. 1999. The authority of testimony. Protosociology 13: 96–116.
    Protosociology  
  20. Weinel, M. 2007. Primary source knowledge and technical decision-making: Mbeki and the AZT debate. Studies in…
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part  
  21. Wynne, B. 2003. Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: Response to Collins a…
    Social Studies of Science