Argumentation Aug 2011

Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts

Jean Goodwin Iowa State University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9219-6
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Duarte (2024)
    Epidemiology of Fallacies
    Argumentation
  2. Innocenti (2022)
    Demanding a halt to metadiscussions
    Argumentation
  3. Koszowy et al. (2022)
    From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to…
    Argumentation
  4. Budzynska et al. (2021)
    Associating Ethos with Objects: Reasoning from Character of Public Figures to A…
    Argumentation
  5. Liao (2021)
    The Legitimacy Crisis of Arguments from Expert Opinion: Can’t We Trust Experts?
    Argumentation
Show all 9 →
  1. Kauffeld et al. (2018)
    A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting
    Argumentation
  2. Mizrahi (2018)
    Arguments from Expert Opinion and Persistent Bias
    Argumentation
  3. Innocenti et al. (2018)
    The Persuasive Force of Demanding
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Jackson (2015)
    Design Thinking in Argumentation Theory and Practice
    Argumentation

References (41) · 5 in this index

  1. L Ceccarelli (2011)
    Ceccarelli, L. 2011. Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric and …
    Rhetoric and Public Affairs  ↗
  2. D Colingridge (1986)
    Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making
  3. H Collins (2002)
    Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Soci…
    Social Studies of Science  ↗
  4. H Collins (2003)
    Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2003. King Canute meets the beach boys: Responses to the third wave. Social Studie…
    Social Studies of Science  ↗
  5. H Collins (2007)
    Rethinking expertise
     ↗
Show all 41 →
  1. H Collins (1998)
    The golem: What you should know about science
  2. H Collins (2010)
    Collins, H., M. Weinel, and R. Evans. 2010. The politics and policy of the third wave: New technologies and s…
    Critical Policy Studies  ↗
  3. R Evans (2007)
    Evans, R., and A. Plows. 2007. Listening without prejudice? Re-discovering the value of the disinterested cit…
    Social Studies of Science  ↗
  4. F Fischer (2009)
    Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry
     ↗
  5. AI Goldman (2001)
    Goldman, A.I. 2001. Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85–110.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  6. GTh Goodnight (1982)
    Goodnight, G.Th. 1982. The personal, technical and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the…
    Journal of the American Forensic Association
  7. Goodwin (1998)
    Forms of Authority and the Real Ad Verecundiam
    Argumentation
  8. Goodwin (2000)
    Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'
    Argumentation
  9. J Goodwin (2001)
    Goodwin, J. 2001. Cicero’s authority. Philosophy and Rhetoric 34: 38–60.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  ↗
  10. J Goodwin (2007)
    Goodwin, J. 2007. Argument has no function. Informal Logic 27: 69–90.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  11. Goodwin, J. 2009. The authority of the IPCC first assessment report and the manufacture of consensus. Present…
  12. J Goodwin (2010)
    Argument cultures
  13. J Goodwin (2010)
    Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: An examination of Douglas Walton’s theories of re…
  14. Goodwin, J., and M.F. Dahlstrom, 2011. Good reasons for trusting climate science communication. Presented at …
  15. Govier, T. 2010. Conductive arguments and counter considerations. In A practical study of argument, 352–375. …
  16. DH Guston (1999)
    Guston, D.H. 1999. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the Office of Techno…
    Social Studies of Science  ↗
  17. J Hardwig (1985)
    Hardwig, J. 1985. Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy 82: 335–349.
    The Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  18. Innocenti, B. Forthcoming. A normative pragmatic model of making fear appeals. Philosophy and Rhetoric.
  19. Jackson (1998)
    Disputation by Design
    Argumentation
  20. S Jackson (2008)
    Controversy, confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
     ↗
  21. Jacobs (2000)
    Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics
    Argumentation
  22. RH Johnson (1994)
    Logical self-defense
  23. Kauffeld (1998)
    Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing…
    Argumentation
  24. FJ Kauffeld (2002)
    Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis
     ↗
  25. FJ Kauffeld (2009)
    Concerning argument
  26. G Kutrovátz (2010)
    Kutrovátz, G. 2010. Trust in experts: Contextual patterns of warranted epistemic dependence. Balkan Journal o…
    Balkan Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  27. Locke, J. 1975 [1690]. An essay concerning human understanding. ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon.
  28. M Paroske (2009)
    Paroske, M. 2009. Deliberating international science policy controversies: Uncertainty and AIDS in South Afri…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  29. SH Priest (2003)
    Priest, S.H., H. Bonfadelli, and M. Rusanen. 2003. The “trust gap” hypothesis: Predicting support for biotech…
    Risk Analysis  ↗
  30. SP Shapiro (1987)
    Shapiro, S.P. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology 93: 623–658.
    American Journal of Sociology  ↗
  31. ChW Tindale (1999)
    Tindale, Ch.W. 1999. The authority of testimony. Protosociology 13: 96–116.
    Protosociology  ↗
  32. D Walton (1997)
    Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority
  33. M Weinel (2007)
    Weinel, M. 2007. Primary source knowledge and technical decision-making: Mbeki and the AZT debate. Studies in…
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part  ↗
  34. CA Willard (1996)
    Liberalism and the problem of knowledge: A new rhetoric for modern democracy
  35. J Woods (1974)
    Woods, J., and D. Walton. 1974. Argumentum ad verecundiam. Philosophy and Rhetoric 7: 135–153.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  36. B Wynne (2003)
    Wynne, B. 2003. Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: Response to Collins a…
    Social Studies of Science  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 46 View in citation network → Build reading path →