Cited by in this index (1)

1. Innocenti (2022)
   Demanding a halt to metadiscussions
   Argumentation

Cites in this index (10)

1. Innocenti et al. (2018)
   The Persuasive Force of Demanding
   Philosophy & Rhetoric
2. Marinelli (2016)
   Revisiting Edwin Black: Exhortation as a Prelude to Emotional–Material Rhetoric
   Rhetoric Society Quarterly
3. Hample et al. (2015)
   Arguing to Display Identity
   Argumentation
4. Goodwin (2011)
   Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts
   Argumentation
5. Kauffeld (2009)
   Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe
   Argumentation

Show all 10 →

1. Jacobs (2000)
   Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics
   Argumentation
2. Eemeren et al. (2000)
   Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework
   Argumentation
3. Houtlosser (1998)
   Points of View
   Argumentation
4. Kauffeld (1998)
   Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing…
   Argumentation
5. Jacobs (1989)
   Speech acts and arguments
   Argumentation

Also cites 22 works outside this index ↓

1. C Andone (2013)
   Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations …
    ↗
2. R Asen (2005)
   Asen, R. 2005. Pluralism, disagreement, and the status of argument in the public sphere. Informal Logic 25(2)…
   Informal Logic  ↗
3. JC Briggs (2005)
   Lincoln’s speeches reconsidered
    ↗
4. TM Conley (1984)
   Conley, T.M. 1984. The enthymeme in perspective. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70(2): 168–187.
   Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
5. RN Current (2009)
   The best American history essays on Lincoln
    ↗
6. S Darwall (2013)
   Honor, history, and relationship: Essays in second-personal ethics II
    ↗
7. M Frazer (2010)
   The enlightenment of sympathy: Justice and the moral sentiments in the eighteenth century…
    ↗
8. HP Grice (1957)
   Grice, H.P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66(3): 377–388.
   Philosophical Review  ↗
9. HP Grice (1969)
   Grice, H.P. 1969. Utterer’s meaning and intention. Philosophical Review 78(2): 147–177.
   Philosophical Review  ↗
10. I Ieţcu-Fairclough (2009)
    Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies in strategic maneuvering
     ↗
11. B Innocenti (2011)
    Innocenti, B. 2011a. Countering questionable tactics by crying foul. Argumentation and Advocacy 47(3): 178–188.
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
12. B Innocenti (2016)
    Innocenti, B., and E. Miller. 2016. The persuasive force of political humor. Journal of Communication 66(3): …
    Journal of Communication  ↗
13. FJ Kauffeld (2003)
    Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
     ↗
14. SR Krause (2002)
    Liberalism and honor
     ↗
15. M Leff (2001)
    Leff, M. 2001. Lincoln at Cooper Union: Neo-classical criticism revisited. Western Journal of Communication 6…
    Western Journal of Communication  ↗
16. MC Leff (1974)
    Leff, M.C., and G.P. Mohrmann. 1974. Lincoln at Cooper Union: Rhetorical analysis of the text. Quarterly Jour…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
17. Andrei Moldovan (2016)
    Moldovan, Andrei. 2016. Presumptions in communication. Studia Humana 5(3): 104–117.
    Studia Humana  ↗
18. Shakespeare, W. 1993. Julius Caesar. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from http://shakespeare.mit.edu/julius_caesar/ .
     ↗
19. AF Snoeck Henkemans (2014)
    Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. 2014. Speech act theory and the study of argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and …
    Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric  ↗
20. PF Strawson (1964)
    Strawson, P.F. 1964. Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review 73(4): 439–460.
    Philosophical Review  ↗
21. FH Eemeren van (1984)
    Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
     ↗
22. FH Eemeren van (2014)
    Handbook of argumentation theory
     ↗