Demanding a halt to metadiscussions

Beth Innocenti University of Kansas
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2022-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-022-09569-3
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

Cites in this index (14)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. Argumentation
Show all 14 →
  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
  6. Argumentation
  7. Argumentation
  8. Argumentation
  9. Argumentation
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. Chrisman, Matthew, and Graham Hubbs. 2021. Protest and speech act theory. In The Routledge Handbook of Social…
  2. Toward a rhetoric of insult
  3. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectic…
  4. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2009. How should one respond to fallacious moves? Argumentation …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  5. Goodwin, Jean. 2007. Argument has no function. Informal Logic 27: 69–90.
    Informal Logic  
  6. Goodwin, Jean. 2018. Effective because ethical: Speech act theory as a framework for scientists’ communicatio…
  7. Griffin, R. A. 2012. I AM an angry Black woman: Black feminist autoethnography, voice, and resistance. Women’…
    Women’s Studies in Communication  
  8. Henning, Tempest M. 2021. “I said what I said”—Black women and argumentative politeness norms. Informal Logic…
    Informal Logic  
  9. Howes, Moira, and Catherine Hundleby. 2018. The epistemology of anger in argumentation. Symposion 5: 229–254.
    Symposion  
  10. Innocenti, Beth, and Elizabeth Miller. 2016. The persuasive force of political humor. Journal of Communicatio…
    Journal of Communication  
  11. Jackson, Sally. 2019. Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi 38: 631–643.
    Topoi  
  12. Jackson, Sally, and Mark Aakhus. 2014. Becoming more reflective about the role of design in communication. Jo…
    Journal of Applied Communication Research  
  13. Jacobs, Scott. 2009. Nonfallacious rhetorical design in argumentation. In Pondering on problems of argumentat…
  14. Krabbe, Erik C. W., and Jan Albert van Laar. 2021. In the quagmire of quibbles: A dialectical exploration. Sy…
    Synthese  
  15. van Laar, Jan Albert, and C. W. Erik, and Krabbe. 2016. Fair and unfair strategies in public controversies. J…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  16. Lewiński, Marcin. 2015. Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and…
  17. Lewiński, Marcin. 2019. Argumentative discussion: The rationality of what? Topoi 38: 645–658.
    Topoi  
  18. Mendelberg, Tali, and John Oleske. 2000. Race and public deliberation. Political Communication 17: 169–191.
    Political Communication  
  19. Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber. 2017. The enigma of reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  20. Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication
  21. Pohlhaus, Gaile, Jr. 2012. Relational knowing and epistemic injustice: Toward a theory of “willful hermeneuti…
    Hypatia  
  22. Risse, Thomas. 1999. International norms and domestic change: Arguing and communicative behavior in the human…
    Politics & Society  
  23. Saul, Jennifer. 2017a. Are generics especially pernicious. Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, …
    Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing  
  24. Saul, Jennifer M. 2017b. Racial figleaves, the shifting boundaries of the permissible, and the rise of Donald…
    Philosophical Topics  
  25. Saul, Jennifer. 2021. Racist and sexist fig leaves. In The Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philoso…