Argumentation May 1998

Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing

Fred J. Kauffeld Edgewood College
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1998-05-01
DOI
10.1023/a:1007704116379
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (23)

  1. Innocenti (2024)
    Marshaling Normative Pragmatic Force to Secure Autonomy
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Zenker et al. (2024)
    Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
    Argumentation
  3. Innocenti (2022)
    Demanding a halt to metadiscussions
    Argumentation
  4. Bodlović (2021)
    On the Differences Between Practical and Cognitive Presumptions
    Argumentation
  5. Bodlović (2019)
    Presumptions, and How They Relate to Arguments from Ignorance
    Argumentation
Show all 23 →
  1. Kauffeld et al. (2018)
    A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting
    Argumentation
  2. Eckstein (2018)
    Designing Soundscapes for Argumentation
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Innocenti et al. (2018)
    The Persuasive Force of Demanding
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Corredor (2017)
    Presumptions in Speech Acts
    Argumentation
  5. Lewiński (2017)
    Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions
    Argumentation
  6. Gama (2017)
    The Nature and the Place of Presumptions in Law and Legal Argumentation
    Argumentation
  7. Jory (2016)
    Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference
    Argumentation
  8. Hoppmann (2014)
    A Modern Theory of Stasis
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  9. Macagno (2013)
    Strategies of Character Attack
    Argumentation
  10. Macagno (2012)
    Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions
    Argumentation
  11. Innocenti (2011)
    A Normative Pragmatic Model of Making Fear Appeals
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  12. Goodwin (2011)
    Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts
    Argumentation
  13. Pinto (2010)
    The Uses of Argument in Communicative Contexts
    Argumentation
  14. Kauffeld (2009)
    Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe
    Argumentation
  15. Manolescu (2007)
    Shaming in and into Argumentation
    Argumentation
  16. Hahn et al. (2007)
    The Burden of Proof and Its Role in Argumentation
    Argumentation
  17. Manolescu (2006)
    A Normative Pragmatic Perspective on Appealing to Emotions in Argumentation
    Argumentation
  18. Goodwin (2000)
    Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'
    Argumentation

References (34)

  1. G. E. M. Anscombe (1957)
    Intention
  2. J. L. Austin (1961)
    Philosophical Papers
  3. J. L. Austin (1962)
    How to do Things with Words
  4. J. Butler (1897)
    British Moralists
  5. G. Cronkhite (1966)
    Cronkhite, G.: 1966, 'The Locus of Presumption', Central States Speech Journal 17, 270-276.
    Central States Speech Journal  ↗
Show all 34 →
  1. F. H. v. Eemeren (1990)
    Perspectives on Argumentation
  2. F. H. v. Eemeren (1991)
    Pragmatics at Issue
     ↗
  3. F. H. v. Eemeren (1992)
    Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
  4. F. H. v. Eemeren (1993)
    Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse
  5. R. H. Gaskins (1992)
    Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse
  6. Goodnight, T.: 1980, 'The Liberal and the Conservative Presumption: On Political Philosophy and the Foundatio…
  7. H. P. Grice (1957)
    Grice, H. P.: 1957, 'Meaning', Philosophical Review 62, 397-388.
    Philosophical Review
  8. H. P. Grice (1969)
    Grice, H. P.: 1969, 'Utterer's Meaning and Intention', Philosophical Review 78, 147-177.
    Philosophical Review  ↗
  9. P. Grice (1989)
    Studies in the Way of Words
  10. Kauffeld, F. J.: On Presuming and Presumption, forthcoming.
  11. Kauffeld, F. J.: 1995a, 'On the Difference between Assumptions and Presumptions', in S. Jackson (ed.), Argume…
  12. F. J. Kauffeld (1995)
    Analysis and Evaluation: Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation
  13. P. Marsh (1964)
    Marsh, P.: 1964, 'Is Debate Merely a Game for Conservative Players', Speaker and Gavel 1, 2-17.
    Speaker and Gavel
  14. J. C. Morton (1987)
    The Presumption of Innocence
  15. O'Keefe, D. J.: 1995, 'Argumentation Studies and Dual-Process Models of Persuasion', in F. H. van Eemeren, R.…
  16. W. M. Parish (1929)
    Parish, W. M.: 1929, 'Whately and his Rhetoric', Quarterly Journal of Speech 15, 58-79.
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  17. O. L. Pence (1953)
    Pence, O. L.: 1953, 'The Concept and Function of Logical Proof in the Rhetorical System of Richard Whately', …
    Speech Monographs  ↗
  18. R. E. Petty (1981)
    Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches
  19. E. M. Rogers (1971)
    Communication of Innovations
  20. R. L. Scott (1960)
    Scott, R. L.: 1960, 'On The Meaning of the Term Prima Facie in Argumentation', Central States Speech Journal …
    Central States Speech Journal  ↗
  21. J. M. Sproule (1976)
    Sproule, J. M.: 1976, 'The Psychological Burden of Proof: On the Evolutionary Development of Richard Whately'…
    Communications Monographs  ↗
  22. D. Stampe (1967)
    On the Acoustic Behavior of Rational Animals
  23. D. Stampe (1970)
    Making Promises
  24. D. Stampe (1975)
    Speech Acts
  25. P. F. Strawson (1964)
    Strawson, P. F.: 1964, 'Intention and Convention in Speech Acts', Philosophical Review 73, 439-460.
    Philosophical Review  ↗
  26. G. J. Warnock (1971)
    The Object of Morality
  27. G. J. Warnock (1973)
    Essays on J. L. Austin
  28. R. Whately (1846)
    Elements of Rhetoric: Comprising an Analysis of the Laws of Moral Evidence and of Persuas…
  29. A. R. White (1964)
    Attention
CrossRef global citation count: 67 View in citation network → Build reading path →