Argumentation May 1998

Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing

Fred J. Kauffeld Edgewood College
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1998-05-01
DOI
10.1023/a:1007704116379
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (18)

  1. Zenker et al. (2024)
    Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
    Argumentation
  2. Innocenti (2022)
    Demanding a halt to metadiscussions
    Argumentation
  3. Bodlović (2021)
    On the Differences Between Practical and Cognitive Presumptions
    Argumentation
  4. Bodlović (2019)
    Presumptions, and How They Relate to Arguments from Ignorance
    Argumentation
  5. Kauffeld et al. (2018)
    A Normative Pragmatic Theory of Exhorting
    Argumentation
Show all 18 →
  1. Corredor (2017)
    Presumptions in Speech Acts
    Argumentation
  2. Lewiński (2017)
    Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions
    Argumentation
  3. Gama (2017)
    The Nature and the Place of Presumptions in Law and Legal Argumentation
    Argumentation
  4. Jory (2016)
    Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference
    Argumentation
  5. Macagno (2013)
    Strategies of Character Attack
    Argumentation
  6. Macagno (2012)
    Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions
    Argumentation
  7. Goodwin (2011)
    Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts
    Argumentation
  8. Pinto (2010)
    The Uses of Argument in Communicative Contexts
    Argumentation
  9. Kauffeld (2009)
    Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe
    Argumentation
  10. Manolescu (2007)
    Shaming in and into Argumentation
    Argumentation
  11. Hahn et al. (2007)
    The Burden of Proof and Its Role in Argumentation
    Argumentation
  12. Manolescu (2006)
    A Normative Pragmatic Perspective on Appealing to Emotions in Argumentation
    Argumentation
  13. Goodwin (2000)
    Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. G. Cronkhite (1966)
    Cronkhite, G.: 1966, 'The Locus of Presumption', Central States Speech Journal 17, 270-276.
    Central States Speech Journal  ↗
  2. F. H. v. Eemeren (1991)
    Pragmatics at Issue
     ↗
  3. H. P. Grice (1969)
    Grice, H. P.: 1969, 'Utterer's Meaning and Intention', Philosophical Review 78, 147-177.
    Philosophical Review  ↗
  4. W. M. Parish (1929)
    Parish, W. M.: 1929, 'Whately and his Rhetoric', Quarterly Journal of Speech 15, 58-79.
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  5. O. L. Pence (1953)
    Pence, O. L.: 1953, 'The Concept and Function of Logical Proof in the Rhetorical System of Richard Whately', …
    Speech Monographs  ↗
  6. R. L. Scott (1960)
    Scott, R. L.: 1960, 'On The Meaning of the Term Prima Facie in Argumentation', Central States Speech Journal …
    Central States Speech Journal  ↗
  7. J. M. Sproule (1976)
    Sproule, J. M.: 1976, 'The Psychological Burden of Proof: On the Evolutionary Development of Richard Whately'…
    Communications Monographs  ↗
  8. P. F. Strawson (1964)
    Strawson, P. F.: 1964, 'Intention and Convention in Speech Acts', Philosophical Review 73, 439-460.
    Philosophical Review  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 66 View in citation network → Build reading path →