Journal
Argumentation
Published
2012-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9232-9
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation

References (92) · 3 in this index

  1. Allott, N. 2005. Paul Grice, reasoning and pragmatics. UCL, Working papers in linguistics 17: 217–243.
    UCL, Working papers in linguistics
  2. Antley, K. 1974. McCawley’s Theory of selectional restriction. Foundations of Language 11(2): 257–272.
    Foundations of Language
  3. Asher, N., and A. Lascarides. 1995. Lexical disambiguation in a discourse context. Journal of Semantics 12(1)…
    Journal of Semantics  
  4. Asher, N., and A. Lascarides. 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition. Journal of Semantics 15: …
    Journal of Semantics  
  5. Logics of conversation
Show all 92 →
  1. How to do things with words
  2. Basic topics in the philosophy of language
  3. Blackwell. Guide to the philosophy of language
  4. Ballard, D., R. Conrad, and R. Longacre. 1971. The deep and surface grammar of interclausal relations. Founda…
    Foundations of Language
  5. Bell, D. 1997. Innuendo. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 35–59.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  6. The principles of the law of evidence; With elementary rules for conducting the examinati…
  7. The limits to debate: A revised theory of semantic presupposition
  8. Capone, A. 2009. Are explicatures cancellable? Toward a theory of the speaker’s intentionality. Intercultural…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  9. Plan recognition in natural language
  10. Thoughts and utterances
  11. The defendant
  12. Using language
  13. Corblin, F. 2003. Presuppositions and commitment stores. In: Diabruck, Proceedings of the 7th workshop on the…
  14. Pragmatic structure inference
  15. Qu’est-ce que le structuralisme?
  16. Les actes de langage
  17. Ducrot, O. 1978. Deux Mais. Cahier de linguistique 8: 109–120.
    Cahier de linguistique  
  18. Les échelles argumentatives
  19. Dire et ne pas dire
  20. Dutilh Novaes, C. 2005. Medieval obligationes as logical games of consistency maintenance. Synthese 145(3): 3…
    Synthese  
  21. Dutilh Novaes, C. 2010. A deontic-pragmatic interpretation of obligationes. In XVIII ESMLS: European symposiu…
  22. Ephratt, M. 2008. The functions of silence. Journal of pragmatics 40: 1909–1938.
    Journal of pragmatics  
  23. Historians’ fallacies
  24. Acceptable premises: An epistemic approach to an informal logic problem
  25. La Negazione tra Semantica e Pragmatica
  26. Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th international pragmatics conference
  27. A companion to the philosophy of action (58–66)
  28. Greenall, A.K. 2009. Towards a new theory of flouting. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2295–2311.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  29. A treatise on the law of evidence
  30. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts
  31. Studies in the way of words
  32. The thread of discourse
  33. Grosz, B., and C. Sidnert. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguis…
    Computational Linguistics
  34. Harman, G. 1965. The inference to the best explanation. The Philosophical Review 74(1): 88–95.
    The Philosophical Review  
  35. Hobbs, J. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive science 3: 67–90.
    Cognitive science  
  36. On the coherence and structure of discourse. Report No. CSLI-85–37
  37. The handbook of pragmatics
  38. Argumentation and values: Proceedings of the ninth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation
  39. Argumentation
  40. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  41. Kempson, R. 1973. Presupposition: A problem for linguistic theory. Transactions of the Philological Society 7…
    Transactions of the Philological Society  
  42. Kibble, R. 2006. Speech acts, commitment and multi-agent communication. Computational & Mathematical Organiza…
    Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory  
  43. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions
  44. Pragmatics
  45. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature
  46. Lewis, D. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359.
    Journal of Philosophical Logic  
  47. Litman, D., and J. Allen. 1987. A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversations. Cognitive Science…
    Cognitive Science  
  48. Lumsden, D. 2008. Kinds of conversational cooperation. Journal of Pragmatics 40(11): 1896–1908.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  49. Semantics
  50. Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2010. Dichotomies and oppositions in legal argumentation. Ratio Juris 23(2): 229–257.
    Ratio Juris  
  51. Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2011. Reasoning from Paradigms and Negative Evidence. Pragmatics & Cognition 19(1…
  52. McBaine, J.P. 1938. Presumptions; are they evidence? California Law Review 26(5): 519–563.
    California Law Review  
  53. McCawley, J.D. 1971. Interpretative semantics meets Frankenstein. Foundations of Language 7: 285–296.
    Foundations of Language
  54. Rhetorische Fragen
  55. In two minds: Dual processes and beyond
  56. Morency, P., P. Oswald, and L. De Saussure. 2008. Explicitenss, impliciteness and commitment atribution. A co…
    Belgian Journal of Linguistics  
  57. Pap, A. 1960. Types and meaninglessness. Mind 69(273): 41–54.
    Mind  
  58. Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1951. Act and person in argument. Ethics 61(4): 251–269.
    Ethics  
  59. Quasthoff, U. 1978. The uses of stereotype in everyday argument. Journal of Pragmatics 2(19): 1–48.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  60. Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge
  61. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition
  62. Rigotti, E. (2005). Congruity theory and argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences: 75–96.
  63. Rigotti, E., and A. Rocci. 2001. Sens–non-sens–contresens. Studies in Communication Sciences 1: 45–80.
    Studies in Communication Sciences
  64. Sýdesmoi. Connettivi nella realtà dei test
  65. The structures of the life-world
  66. Philosophy in America
  67. Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts (pp. 59–82)
  68. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts
  69. The logic of language
  70. Relevance: Communication and cognition
  71. Semantics and philosophy
  72. Stalnaker, R.C. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7(1): 3–19.
    Journal of Logic, Language and Information  
  73. Introduction to logical theory
  74. A preliminary treatise on evidence at the common law
  75. Ullman-Margalit, E. 1983. On presumption. The Journal of Philosophy 80(3): 143–163.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  76. A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectal approach
  77. Essays in speech act theory
  78. Foundations of illocutionary logic
  79. The analysis of speech act verbs: Theoretical preliminaries
  80. Informal logic
  81. Walton, D. 1993. The speech act of presumption. Pragmatics & Cognition 1: 125–148.
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  82. Argumentation
  83. Legal argumentation and evidence
  84. Dialog theory for critical argumentation
  85. Argumentation
  86. Commitment in dialogue
  87. Pragmatics