Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2022

The Argumentative “Logic” of Humor

Fabrizio Macagno ; Michael Cundall

Abstract

ABSTRACT The logic of humor has been acknowledged as an essential dimension of every joke. However, what is the logic of jokes, exactly? The modern theories of humor maintain that jokes are characterized by their own logic, dubbed “pseudo,” “playful,” or “local,” which has been the object of frequent criticisms. This article intends to address the limitations of the current perspectives on the logic of jokes by proposing a rhetorical approach to humorous texts. Building on the traditional development of Aristotle’s almost neglected view of jokes as surprising enthymemes, the former are analyzed as rhetorical arguments. Like enthymemes, jokes are characterized by natural inferences that can be represented as topics, and quasi-formalized in argumentation theory as argumentation schemes. Like rhetorical arguments, jokes express a reason in support of different types of conclusions and proceed from distinct kinds of reasoning and semantic relations.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2022-10-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.55.3.0223
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (100) · 8 in this index

  1. (1970)
    Dialectica
  2. (1991)
    The Complete Works of Aristotle
  3. (1991)
    “Topic/Comment, Presupposition, Logical Form and Focus Stress Implicatures: The Case of F…
    Journal of Semantics
  4. (2005)
    Logic, Meaning, and Conversation
  5. (1981)
    Radical Pragmatics
Show all 100 →
  1. (2010)
    Linguistic Theories of Humor
  2. (2002)
    “Script Oppositions and Logical Mechanisms: Modeling Incongruities and Their Resolutions.”
    Humor—International Journal of Humor Research
  3. (1991)
    “Script Theory Revis(It)Ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model.”
    Humor—International Journal of Humor Research
  4. (1962)
    How to Do Things with Words
  5. (1984)
    Rabelais and His World
  6. (2003)
    “Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue between Parties without a Consensus ab…
    Informal Logic
  7. (1992)
    “The Rhetorical Situation.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  8. (1999)
    “The Enthymeme in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: From Argumentation Theory to Logic.”
    Informal Logic
  9. (2004)
    “Assessing the SSTH and GTVH: A View from Cognitive Linguistics.”
    Humor—International Journal of Humor Research
  10. (2001)
    Jewish American Literature: A Norton Anthology
  11. (1988)
    De Inventione
  12. (2014)
    De Oratore
  13. (1999)
    Jokes: Philosophical Thoughts on Joking Matters
  14. (2007)
    “Humor and the Limits of Incongruity.”
    Creativity Research Journal
  15. (1988)
    “Transparency and Doubt: Understanding and Interpretation in Pragmatics and in Law.”
    Law and Philosophy  ↗
  16. (2004)
    “Victor Raskin on Jokes.”
    Humor—International Journal of Humor Research
  17. (2011)
    “Logical Mechanisms: A Critique.”
    Humor—International Journal of Humor Research
  18. (1982)
    “Unexpected Premisses: Part I.”
    Journal of the American Forensic Association
  19. (1984)
    Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discuss…
  20. (1994)
    Comic Transactions: Literature, Humor, and the Politics of Community in Twentieth-Century…
  21. (1984)
    Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse
  22. (1997)
    Informal Logic
  23. (1975)
    Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts
  24. (2004)
    “Topic and Focus.”
    The Handbook of Pragmatics
  25. (1980)
    “How to Play Games with Words: Speech-Act Jokes.”
    Journal of Literary Semantics  ↗
  26. (2011)
    “Resolutions and Their Incongruities: Further Thoughts on Logical Mechanisms.”
    Humor—International Journal of Humor Research
  27. Hitchcock (1998)
    Does the Traditional Treatment of Enthymemes Rest on a Mistake?
    Argumentation
  28. (2001)
    Mirth Making: The Rhetorical Discourse on Jesting in Early Modern England
  29. (1969)
    Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society
  30. (2005)
    Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication
  31. Jenkins, S. 2011. “We giggle at His Machismo—but Silvio Berlusconi Has the Last Laugh.”Guardian, 11…
  32. (2002)
    Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis
  33. KINNEAVY et al. (2000)
    Kairos in Aristotle's Rhetoric
    Written Communication
  34. (1964)
    The Act of Creation
  35. (2006)
    “Gender and Humor: The State of the Art.”
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  36. (2003)
    “Metadialogues.”
    Anyone Who Has a View
  37. (2017)
    The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor
  38. (2014)
    Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon
  39. (2000)
    “Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication.”
    Communication Theory  ↗
  40. Macagno (2012)
    Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions
    Argumentation
  41. Macagno (2013)
    Strategies of Character Attack
    Argumentation
  42. (2022)
    “Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments: The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition.”
    Argumentation
  43. (2013)
    Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy
  44. Macagno et al. (2015)
    Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  45. (2017)
    Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting
  46. Macagno et al. (2017)
    Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions
    Argumentation
  47. (1963)
    Argument of Laughter
  48. (1982)
    “A New Theory of Laughter.”
    Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition  ↗
  49. (1988)
    On Humor: Its Nature and Place in Modern Society
  50. (1994)
    “Laughter for Sale.”
    Sociological Review  ↗
  51. (1994)
    “Involvement and Joking in Conversation.”
    Journal of Pragmatics
  52. (2003)
    “Issues in Conversational Joking.”
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  53. (1974)
    Le Comique Du Discours
  54. (2019)
    “Oppositions, Overlaps, and Ontologies: The General Theory of Verbal Humor Revisited.”
    HUMOR  ↗
  55. (1987)
    The Logic of the Absurd: On Film and Television Comedy
  56. (2003)
    Taking Humour Seriously
  57. (1969)
    The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
  58. (2015)
    “Performing Extracomunitari: Mocking Migrants in Veneto Barzellette.”
    Language in Society  ↗
  59. (2012)
    “Fiducia e Argomentazione. Una Prospettiva Aristotelica.”
    RIFL
  60. (1996)
    Institutio Oratoria
  61. (1985)
    Semantic Mechanisms of Humor
  62. (1980)
    “Some Remarks on Explicit Performatives, Indirect Speech Acts, Locutionary Meaning and Tr…
    Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics
  63. (2002)
    “Unarticulated Constituents.”
    Linguistics and Philosophy  ↗
  64. (2014)
    “Logic and Reasoning in Jokes.”
    European Journal of Humour Research  ↗
  65. (1978)
    Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction
     ↗
  66. (1975)
    IJCAI’75 Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  67. (1975)
    Syntax and Semantics
  68. (2013)
    “Intersections of Wit and Rhetoric: Humor as a Rhetorical Enterprise.”
    Proteus: A Journal of Ideas
  69. (1988)
    “Are Enthymemes Arguments?”
    Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
  70. (1995)
    Relevance: Communication and Cognition
  71. (1964)
    “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts.”
    Philosophical Review  ↗
  72. (1992)
    “Kairos and the Rhetoric of Belief.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  73. (1999)
    Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument
  74. (2013)
  75. (1955)
    La Logica Di Aristotele
  76. (1994)
    Laughter down the Centuries
  77. (2015)
    “Comedian-in-Chief: Presidential Jokes as Enthymematic Crisis Rhetoric.”
    Presidential Studies Quarterly  ↗
  78. Walker (1994)
    The Body of Persuasion: A Theory of the Enthymeme
    College English
  79. (1990)
    Practical Reasoning
  80. (1990)
    “What Is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?”
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  81. (1992)
    Slippery Slope Arguments
  82. (1995)
    A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy
  83. (1998)
    Ad Hominem Arguments
  84. Walton (1999)
    Historical Origins of Argumentum ad Consequentiam
    Argumentation
  85. (2004)
    Abductive Reasoning
  86. (2010)
    Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), ed
  87. (2010)
    “Why Fallacies Appear to Be Better Arguments Than They Are.”
    Informal Logic  ↗
  88. (2021)
    Statutory Interpretation: Pragmatics and Argumentation
  89. (2008)
    Argumentation Schemes
  90. (2002)
    Right Practical Reason: Aristotle, Action, and Prudence in Aquinas
  91. (2008)
    “A Relevance-Theoretic Classification of Jokes.”
    Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
  92. (2012)
    Studies in Linguistics and Cognition
  93. (2013)
    Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse
  94. (1984)
    Personality and Sense of Humor
  95. (2020)
    “Opinion: Why Do None of Trump’s ‘Jokes’ Feel Like Jokes?”
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  2. Poroi Feb 2026
    Using Stasis Theory as a Heuristic for Examining Epistemological Dilemmas in a Post-Truth Landscape ↗
    Bruce Bowles
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  3. Res Rhetorica Jan 2026
    Ethos – between vir bonus and VIA: Virtue ethics in contemporary rhetorical education ↗
    Agnieszka Budzyńska-Daca
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory argument
  4. Rhetorica Jan 2026
    The Daimonion of Isocrates: Anti-Socratic Polemics and the Power of Politikoi Logoi in the Philippos ↗
    Tobias Hirsch
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2025
    The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958 ↗
    Christopher W. Tindale
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis revision argument collaborative writing editorial matter