Abstract

Abstract In numerous communicative practices, particularly in social media communication, it has become common to encounter messages pursuing a multiplicity of possible functions. They provide information, but sharing it is not their only or most important purpose. They appear to advocate for a particular viewpoint, yet no specific conclusion is stated, no argumentative or persuasive context surrounds them, and no dialectical exchanges follow or precede them. From a practical perspective, such messages, designated as “info-arguments,” are powerful strategies for advancing reasons, enabling the speaker to avoid the corresponding burden of proof. From a theoretical perspective, they challenge the pragmatic theories of meaning underlying argument reconstruction. Absent a specific context and considering the composite nature of an audience characterized by diverse backgrounds, how can we establish and justify that an info-argument conveys an argument? This paper proposes an analytical framework based on a dynamic and dialectical approach to meaning. In this view, the meaning of an info-argument is not represented as a pre-existing speaker’s intention manifested in a clear communication setting. Instead, it is regarded as a set of distinct, least defeasible interpretations characterizing various possible scenarios defined by several factors (or presumptions) that vary depending on the interlocutors’ backgrounds and values.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09667-y
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Show all 8 →
  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
Also cites 47 works outside this index ↓
  1. Arundale, Robert. 2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmat…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  2. Politeness: Some universals in Language usage
  3. Perspectives on socially shared cognition
  4. Using Language
  5. Drew, Paul, Traci Walker, and Richard Ogden. 2013. Self-repair and action construction. In Conversational rep…
  6. Elder, Chi-Hé, Michael Haugh. 2023. Exposing and avoiding unwanted inferences in conversational interaction. …
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  7. Elder, Chi-Hé, and Michael Haugh. 2018. The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal acc…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  8. Elder, Chi-Hé, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt. 2024. Towards a dynamic functional proposition for dynamic discourse m…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  9. Foundations of computational linguistics, human-computer communication in natural Language
  10. Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures
  11. Ilie, Cornelia. 2022. Meta-questions and meta-answers: The interplay of metadialogic practices in PMQs. Journ…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  12. Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthyme…
  13. Jacobs Scott (2016) Employing and exploiting the presumptions of communication in argumentation: An applicati…
    Informal Logic  
  14. Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2007. The syntax-pragmatics merger: Belief reports in the theory of default semantics. Prag…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  15. Salience and defaults in utterance processing
  16. Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2021. Functional proposition: A new concept for representing discourse meaning? Journal of …
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  17. Semantics, pragmatics, philosophy. A journey through meaning
  18. Johnson, Ralph. 1984. Charity Begins at Home. Informal Logic 3:4–9. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v3i3.2791
  19. Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40:385–406. https:…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  20. Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive …
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  21. Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42:2889–2897. http…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  22. Intercultural pragmatics
  23. Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2013. On the dynamic relations between common ground and presupposition. …
  24. Lee, James, and Steven Pinker. 2010. Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psy…
  25. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature
  26. Lewinski, Marcin. 2021. Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues. Informal Logic 41:421–451. https://…
    Informal Logic  
  27. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2018. A dialectical approach to presupposition. Intercultural Pragmatics 15: 291–313. http…
  28. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2017a. Defaults and inferences in interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 117: 280–290. http…
  29. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2022. Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of popul…
  30. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Ana Trevisan. 2023. Strategic communication in the Covid-19 pandemics. Uses of argumen…
  31. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. 2017. Interpreting straw man argumentation. The pragmatics of quotatio…
  32. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi. 2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication– Dialogical i…
  33. Nerlich, Brigitte, and David Clarke. 2001. Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal …
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  34. Oswald, Steve. 2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203:144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  35. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1951. Act and person in argument. Ethics 61:251–269. https://doi…
    Ethics  
  36. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition
  37. Strawson, Peter. 1964. Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73:439–460. https://…
    The Philosophical Review  
  38. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
  39. Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse: Fifty contributions to the d…
  40. Argumentation theory: A Pragma-Dialectical perspective
  41. Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering
  42. Van Laar, Jan Albert. 2001. Ambiguity in a dialectical perspective. Informal Logic 21:245–266. https://doi.or…
    Informal Logic  
  43. Slippery slope arguments
  44. Fallacies arising from ambiguity
  45. The new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument
  46. Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric
  47. Argumentation schemes