Abstract

Abstract In numerous communicative practices, particularly in social media communication, it has become common to encounter messages pursuing a multiplicity of possible functions. They provide information, but sharing it is not their only or most important purpose. They appear to advocate for a particular viewpoint, yet no specific conclusion is stated, no argumentative or persuasive context surrounds them, and no dialectical exchanges follow or precede them. From a practical perspective, such messages, designated as “info-arguments,” are powerful strategies for advancing reasons, enabling the speaker to avoid the corresponding burden of proof. From a theoretical perspective, they challenge the pragmatic theories of meaning underlying argument reconstruction. Absent a specific context and considering the composite nature of an audience characterized by diverse backgrounds, how can we establish and justify that an info-argument conveys an argument? This paper proposes an analytical framework based on a dynamic and dialectical approach to meaning. In this view, the meaning of an info-argument is not represented as a pre-existing speaker’s intention manifested in a clear communication setting. Instead, it is regarded as a set of distinct, least defeasible interpretations characterizing various possible scenarios defined by several factors (or presumptions) that vary depending on the interlocutors’ backgrounds and values.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09667-y
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (78) · 8 in this index

  1. Arundale, Robert. 2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmat…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  2. Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. 2004. Boethius’s De topicis differentiis. Edited by Eleonore Stump. Itha…
  3. Politeness: Some universals in Language usage
  4. Perspectives on socially shared cognition
  5. Using Language
Show all 78 →
  1. Drew, Paul, Traci Walker, and Richard Ogden. 2013. Self-repair and action construction. In Conversational rep…
  2. Elder, Chi-Hé, Michael Haugh. 2023. Exposing and avoiding unwanted inferences in conversational interaction. …
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  3. Elder, Chi-Hé, and Michael Haugh. 2018. The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal acc…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  4. Elder, Chi-Hé, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt. 2024. Towards a dynamic functional proposition for dynamic discourse m…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  5. Problems in argument analysis and evaluation
  6. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts
  7. Studies in the way of words
  8. Fallacies
  9. Foundations of computational linguistics, human-computer communication in natural Language
  10. Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures
  11. Ilie, Cornelia. 2022. Meta-questions and meta-answers: The interplay of metadialogic practices in PMQs. Journ…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  12. Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthyme…
  13. Argumentation
  14. Argumentation
  15. Jacobs Scott (2016) Employing and exploiting the presumptions of communication in argumentation: An applicati…
    Informal Logic  
  16. Discourse, beliefs and intentions
  17. Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of Language and linguistics
  18. Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2007. The syntax-pragmatics merger: Belief reports in the theory of default semantics. Prag…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  19. Salience and defaults in utterance processing
  20. Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2021. Functional proposition: A new concept for representing discourse meaning? Journal of …
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  21. Semantics, pragmatics, philosophy. A journey through meaning
  22. Johnson, Ralph. 1984. Charity Begins at Home. Informal Logic 3:4–9. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v3i3.2791
  23. Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40:385–406. https:…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  24. Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive …
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  25. Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42:2889–2897. http…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  26. Intercultural pragmatics
  27. Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2013. On the dynamic relations between common ground and presupposition. …
  28. Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure
  29. Lee, James, and Steven Pinker. 2010. Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psy…
  30. Principles of pragmatics
  31. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature
  32. Lewinski, Marcin. 2021. Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues. Informal Logic 41:421–451. https://…
    Informal Logic  
  33. Argumentation
  34. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2018. A dialectical approach to presupposition. Intercultural Pragmatics 15: 291–313. http…
  35. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2017a. Defaults and inferences in interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 117: 280–290. http…
  36. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2017b. The logical and pragmatic structure of arguments from analogy. Logique et Analyse 6…
  37. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2022. Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of popul…
  38. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Ana Trevisan. 2023. Strategic communication in the Covid-19 pandemics. Uses of argumen…
  39. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. 2017. Interpreting straw man argumentation. The pragmatics of quotatio…
  40. Argumentation
  41. Argumentation
  42. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi. 2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication– Dialogical i…
  43. Pragmatics: An introduction
  44. Nerlich, Brigitte, and David Clarke. 2001. Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal …
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  45. The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion
  46. Oswald, Steve. 2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203:144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  47. Paglieri, Fabio. 2007. No More Charity, Please! Enthymematic Parsimony and the Pitfall of Benevolence. In Pro…
  48. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1951. Act and person in argument. Ethics 61:251–269. https://doi…
    Ethics  
  49. Argumentation
  50. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition
  51. Reasoning
  52. Relevance: Communication and cognition
  53. Strawson, Peter. 1964. Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73:439–460. https://…
    The Philosophical Review  
  54. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
  55. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective
  56. Argumentation
  57. Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse: Fifty contributions to the d…
  58. Argumentation theory: A Pragma-Dialectical perspective
  59. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
  60. Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering
  61. Van Laar, Jan Albert. 2001. Ambiguity in a dialectical perspective. Informal Logic 21:245–266. https://doi.or…
    Informal Logic  
  62. The dialectic of ambiguity
  63. Informal logic
  64. Slippery slope arguments
  65. Argumentation
  66. Fallacies arising from ambiguity
  67. The new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument
  68. One-sided arguments: A dialectical analysis of bias
  69. Fundamentals of critical argumentation
  70. Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric
  71. Argumentation schemes
  72. Handbook of pragmatics
  73. Better reasoning: Techniques for handling argument, evidence, and abstraction