The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion

Jakub Pruś Jesuit University Ignatianum ; Piotr Sikora Jesuit University Ignatianum

Abstract

AbstractThis paper aims to discuss a well-known concept from argumentation theory, namely the principle of charity. It will show that this principle, especially in its contemporary version as formulated by Donald Davidson, meets with some serious problems. Since we need the principle of charity in any kind of critical discussion, we propose the way of modifying it according to the presupponendum—the rule written in the sixteenth century by Ignatius Loyola. While also corresponding with pragma-dialectical rules, it also provides additional content. This will be termed the dialectical principle of charity, and it offers a few steps to be performed during an argument in order to make sure that the participants understand each other well and are not deceived by any cognitive bias. The meaning of these results could be of great significance for argumentation theory, pragma-dialectics and the practice of public discourse as it enhances the principle of charity and makes it easier to apply in argumentation.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2023-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09615-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Argumentation
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. Chandrashekar, Subramanya Prasad, Siu Kit Yeung, Ka Chai Yau, Chung Yee Cheung, Tanay Kulbhushan Agarwal, Cho…
    Judgment and Decision Making  
  2. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation
  3. Davidson, Donald. 1991. "Three varieties of knowledge." In Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, edited b…
  4. Govier, Trudy. 2018. Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. 2nd edition. Windsor: Windsor Studies in A…
  5. Hautli-Janisz, Annette, Katarzyna Budzynska, Conor McKillop, Brian Plüss, Valentin Gold, and Chris Reed. 2022…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  6. Lewiński, Marcin. 2012. The Paradox of Charity. Informal Logic 32 (4): 403–439. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v…
    Informal Logic  
  7. Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting
  8. Pronin, Emily, and Matthew B. Kugler. 2007. Valuing Thoughts, Ignoring Behavior: The Introspection Illusion a…
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology  
  9. Pronin, Emily, Daniel Y. Lin, and Lee Ross. 2002. The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self-versus Oth…
    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin  
  10. Pronin, Emily, Thomas Gilovich, and Lee Ross. 2004. Objectivity in the Eye of the Beholder: Divergent Percept…
    Psychological Review  
  11. Stevens, Katharina. 2021. Charity for Moral Reasons?—A Defense of the Principle of Charity in Argumentation. …
    Argument and Advocacy  
  12. Stroud, Scott R. 2017. Rhetoric, Ethics, and the Principle of Charity: Pragmatist Clues to the Democratic Rid…
    Language & Dialogue  
  13. Thagard, Paul, and Richard E. Nisbett. 1983. Rationality and Charity. Philosophy of Science 50 (2): 250–267.
    Philosophy of Science  
  14. Eemeren, FH., and R Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialected approach. …
  15. Walton, Douglas. 2000. New Dialectical Rules for Ambiguity. Informal Logic 20 (3): 261–274.
    Informal Logic