Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them

Katharina Stevens

doi:10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0109

Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2021

Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them

Katharina Stevens University of Lethbridge

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper contributes to the debate about the strawman fallacy. It is the received view that strawmen are employed to fool not the arguer whose argument they distort, but instead a third party, an audience. I argue that strawmen that fool their victims exist and are an important variation of the strawman fallacy because of their special perniciousness. I show that those who are subject to hermeneutical lacunae or who have since forgotten parts of justifications they have provided earlier are especially vulnerable to falling for strawmen aimed at their own positions or arguments. Adversarial argumentation provides especially fertile ground for strawmen that fool their own victims, but cooperative argumentation is no fail-safe protection from them either.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2021-06-15
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0109
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

Pruś et al. (2023)

The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion

Argumentation
Bauri (2022)

Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning

Argumentation
Aikin et al. (2022)

Bothsiderism

Argumentation
Popa (2021)

Farewell to Fallacies (and Welcome Back!)

Philosophy & Rhetoric

References (34) · 3 in this index

(2014)

Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting.

Philosophical Perspectives ↗
Aikin et al. (2011)

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men

Argumentation
(2016)

Straw Men, Iron Men, and Argumentative Virtue.

Topoi ↗
(2020)

Political Argument in a Polarized Age
(2011)

The Moral Normativity of Argumentation.

Cogency

Show all 34 →

(2000)

In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
(2020)

Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
(2020)

Adversariality and Argumentation.

Informal Logic ↗
Casey, John. 2020b. “Commentary on Marcin Lewińksi's ‘Metalinguistic Disagreements, Underdetermination and th…
(2015)

Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory
(2007)

Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
(1987)

Problems in Argument Evaluation and Analysis
(1987)

Problems in Argument Evaluation and Analysis
(2020)

Rigour and Reason: Essays in Honour of Hans Wilhelm Hansen
Lewiński (2011)

Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation

Argumentation
(2012)

The Paradox of Charity.

Informal Logic ↗
(2020)

Metalinguistic Disagreements, Underdetermination and the Straw Man Fallacy: Toward Meanin…
(2013)

When and How Do We Deal with Straw Men? A Normative and Cognitive Pragmatic Account.

Journal of Pragmatics ↗
(2011)

Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences ↗
(2003)

Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and…
(2020)

Non-propositional Meanings and Commitment Attribution.

Journal of Argumentation in Context ↗
(2011)

Enthymematic Parsimony.

Synthese (Dordrecht) ↗
(2018)

Argumentation and Language—Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations
(2019)

What Makes a Straw Man Acceptable? Three Experiments Assessing Linguistic Factors.

Journal of Pragmatics ↗
Schumann, Jennifer, Sandrine Zufferey, and Steve Oswald. 2020. “The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matte…
(2016)

The Virtuous Arguer: One Person, Four Roles.

Topoi ↗
Stevens, Katharina. 2021. “Charity for Moral Reasons? A Defense of the Principle of Charity in Argumentation.…

↗
Stevens, Katharina, and Daniel Cohen. 2020. “Angelic Devil's Advocates and the Forms of Adversariality.” Topo…

↗
(2007)

Fallacies and Argument Appraisal
(2014)

Rational Persuasion as Paternalism.

Philosophy & Public Affairs ↗
(2008)

Room for Maneuver When Raising Critical Doubt.

Philosophy and Rhetoric ↗
(1996)

Logic and Argumentation
Walton et al. (2010)

Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments

Argumentation
(2014)

The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation

CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

References (34) · 3 in this index

Related Articles