Philosophy & Rhetoric Dec 2021

Farewell to Fallacies (and Welcome Back!)

Eugen Popa

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fallacies are traditionally defined as potentially deceptive failures of rationality or reasonableness. Fallacy theories seek to model this failure by formulating standards of rationality or reasonableness that arguers must observe when engaging in argumentative interaction. Yet it remains relatively easy to reject or avoid fallacy judgments even in the most clear-cut cases. In this article, I argue for a pluralist approach to criticism in which the fallacy accusation is only the starting point for a more complex form of criticism. In a pluralist approach, the identification of fallacies works as a first step precisely because it can be so easily set aside. In doing so, the evaluator seeks other evaluative angles that depart from the original one. As a case in point, I exemplify the approach on a piece of argumentative discourse in the scientific context. I conclude by spelling out some of the methodological consequences of the present approach.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2021-12-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.54.4.0397
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
modern rhetorical theory discourse analysis grammar and mechanics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (64) · 6 in this index

  1. (2002)
    Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty
  2. (2004)
    “John Snow, William Farr and the 1849 Outbreak of Cholera That Affected London: A Reworki…
    Public Health  ↗
  3. (2019)
    Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide
  4. (1964)
    “Another Look at John Snow.”
    Anesthesia & Analgesia
  5. (2012)
    Critical Reasoning: Understanding and Criticizing Arguments and Theories
Show all 64 →
  1. (2005)
    Pluralism
  2. (2021)
    The Problem of Value Pluralism: Isaiah Berlin and Beyond
  3. (2011)
    Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments
  4. (1978)
    Science in a Free Society
  5. (2019)
    “Logical Fallacies and Reasonable Debates in Invasion Biology: A Response to Guiaşu and T…
    Biology & Philosophy  ↗
  6. (2002)
    Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice
  7. (1989)
    Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation
  8. (2013)
    Good Reasoning Matters! A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking
  9. (2018)
    “Logical Fallacies and Invasion Biology.”
    Biology & Philosophy
  10. (1970)
    Fallacies
  11. (2009)
    Cholera: The Biography
  12. (1995)
    Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings
  13. (2007)
    The Strange Case of the Broad Street Pump: John Snow and the Mystery of Cholera
  14. Jacobs (2000)
    Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics
    Argumentation
  15. (2002)
    Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis
  16. (2006)
    “Derailments of Argumentation: It Takes Two to Tango.”
  17. (1993)
    The Morality of Pluralism
  18. (2011)
    Pluralism
  19. Lewiński (2011)
    Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation
    Argumentation
  20. (2007)
    After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
  21. (2013)
    “Why Arguments from Expert Opinion Are Weak Arguments.”
    Informal Logic  ↗
  22. (1999)
    “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?”
    Social Research
  23. (2005)
    The Return of the Political
  24. (2013)
    Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically
  25. (1986)
    The View from Nowhere
  26. (1990)
    “Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato’s Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry.”
    History of Philosophy Quarterly
  27. (1991)
    Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays
  28. (1969)
    The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
  29. (2006)
    How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic
  30. (2016)
    “Criticism without Fundamental Principles.”
    Informal Logic  ↗
  31. (2013)
    Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric
  32. (1976)
    “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic: Ten Years Later.”
    Central States Speech Journal  ↗
  33. (2012)
    “Thomas Wakley (1795–1862): A Biographical Sketch.”
    Lancet  ↗
  34. Stevens (2021)
    Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  35. (2007)
    Fallacies and Argument Appraisal
  36. (1958)
    The Uses of Argument
  37. (2010)
    Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory…
  38. Eemeren (2012)
    The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion
    Argumentation
  39. (2014)
    Handbook of Argumentation Theory
  40. (2009)
    Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Diale…
  41. (2004)
    A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
  42. (2009)
    “How Should One Respond to Fallacious Moves?”
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  43. (2000)
    “The (Un)reasonableness of Ad Hominem Fallacies.”
    Journal of Language and Social Psychology  ↗
  44. (2003)
    Cholera, Chloroform, and the Science of Medicine: A Life of John Snow
  45. Wagemans (2011)
    The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
    Argumentation
  46. (1855)
    “Editorial.”
    Lancet
  47. (1998)
    Ad Hominem Arguments
  48. (2000)
    “Case Study of the Use of a Circumstantial Ad Hominem in Political Argumentation.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric  ↗
  49. (2006)
    Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation
  50. (2014)
    Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation
  51. (2015)
    Argument Evaluation and Evidence
  52. (2008)
    Argumentation Schemes
  53. (1983)
    Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality
  54. (1987)
    Interpretation and Social Criticism:The Tanner Lectures on Human Values
  55. (1994)
    Weber: Political Writings
  56. (1988)
    “Buttercups, GNP’s and Quarks: Are Fallacies Theoretical Entities?”
    Informal Logic
  57. (2004)
    The Death of Argument
  58. (1982)
    Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies
  59. Zenker (2013)
    What Do Normative Approaches to Argumentation Stand to Gain from Rhetorical Insights?
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Res Rhetorica Jan 2026
    Review/Recenzja: Nancy Organ. 2024. Data Visualization for People of All Ages. Oxon: CRC Press; and Jen Christiansen. 2023. Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science Through Diagrams and Visualizations. Oxon: CRC Press ↗
    Ewa Modrzejewska
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis digital rhetoric multimodality grammar and mechanics race and writing book reviews
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Sep 2024
    Where’s the Rhetoric? Imagining a Unified Field ↗
    Joshua Hanan
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism composition theory genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics argument qualitative research quantitative research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Jan 2024
    The Radical Role of Student Writing in Composition ↗
    Jessica Masterson
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing
  4. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2020
    Editor's Note: In the midst of …? ↗
    —Erik Doxtader
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis collaborative writing archival research grammar and mechanics editorial matter