Argumentation Mar 2011

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men

Scott F. Aikin Vanderbilt University ; John Casey Northeastern Illinois University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-010-9199-y
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Younis (2026)
    (Mis)representing the Opposition and Rhetorical Success: Experimental Evidence …
    Argumentation
  2. Bauri (2022)
    Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning
    Argumentation
  3. Aikin et al. (2022)
    Bothsiderism
    Argumentation
  4. Schumann et al. (2021)
    The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives
    Argumentation
  5. Boudry et al. (2015)
    The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life
    Argumentation
Show all 6 →
  1. Lewiński (2011)
    Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Talisse et al. (2006)
    Two Forms of the Straw Man
    Argumentation
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. GeorgeY Bizer (2009)
    Bizer, George.Y., Sirel.M. Kozak, and Leigh.Ann. Holterman. 2009. The persuasiveness of the straw man rhetori…
    Social Influence  ↗
  2. Brian Ribeiro (2008)
    Ribeiro, Brian. 2008. How often do we (Philosophy Professors) commit the straw man fallacy? Teaching Philosoi…
    Teaching Philosoiphy  ↗
  3. Cass Sunstein (2002)
    Sunstein, Cass. 2002. The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2): 175–195.
    Journal of Political Philosophy  ↗
  4. Christopher Tindale (2007)
    Fallacies and argument appraisal
     ↗
  5. Eemeren Van (2002)
    Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation
     ↗
  6. Frans Eemeren Van (2007)
    Van Eemeren, Frans., and Peter. Houtlosser. 2007. The contextuality of fallacies. Informal Logic 27: 59–67.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  7. JanPeter Laar Van (2008)
    Van Laar, Jan.Peter. 2008. Room for maneuver when raising critical doubt. Philosophy and Rhetoric 41(3): 195–211.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 37 View in citation network → Build reading path →