Argumentation Mar 2011

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men

Scott F. Aikin Vanderbilt University ; John Casey Northeastern Illinois University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-010-9199-y
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Younis (2026)
    (Mis)representing the Opposition and Rhetorical Success: Experimental Evidence …
    Argumentation
  2. Bauri (2022)
    Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning
    Argumentation
  3. Aikin et al. (2022)
    Bothsiderism
    Argumentation
  4. Schumann et al. (2021)
    The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives
    Argumentation
  5. Stevens (2021)
    Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
Show all 7 →
  1. Boudry et al. (2015)
    The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life
    Argumentation
  2. Lewiński (2011)
    Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation
    Argumentation

References (32) · 1 in this index

  1. Aikin, Scott., and Caleb, Clanton. Forthcoming. Developing group deliberative virtues. Journal of Applied Phi…
  2. C Barker (1993)
    Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism
  3. Stan Baronett (2008)
    Logic
  4. Greg Bassham (2002)
    Critical thinking
  5. JeromeE Bickenbach (1997)
    Good reasons for better arguments
Show all 32 →
  1. GeorgeY Bizer (2009)
    Bizer, George.Y., Sirel.M. Kozak, and Leigh.Ann. Holterman. 2009. The persuasiveness of the straw man rhetori…
    Social Influence  ↗
  2. IrvingM Copi (2007)
    Essentials of logic
  3. Ann Coulter (2002)
    Slander: Liberal lies about the American right
  4. Trudy Govier (1997)
    A practical study of argument
  5. HP Grice (1975)
    Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts
  6. Edward Haley (2006)
    Strategies of dominance: The misdirection of US
  7. Patrick Hurley (1994)
    A concise introduction to logic
  8. R Johnson (1983)
    Logical self-defence
  9. Lord, Jeffrey. 2007. Iraq and the party of race. The American Spectator. February 16.
  10. Ray Perkins Jr (1995)
    Logic and Mr. Limbaugh
  11. Brian Ribeiro (2008)
    Ribeiro, Brian. 2008. How often do we (Philosophy Professors) commit the straw man fallacy? Teaching Philosoi…
    Teaching Philosoiphy  ↗
  12. Joel Rudinow (2008)
    Invitation to critical thinking
  13. Cass Sunstein (2009)
    On rumors
  14. Cass Sunstein (2006)
    Infotopia
  15. Cass Sunstein (2002)
    Sunstein, Cass. 2002. The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2): 175–195.
    Journal of Political Philosophy  ↗
  16. Talisse et al. (2006)
    Two Forms of the Straw Man
    Argumentation
  17. Robert Talisse (2008)
    Getting duped: How the media messes with your mind
  18. Christopher Tindale (2007)
    Fallacies and argument appraisal
     ↗
  19. Eemeren Van (2002)
    Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation
     ↗
  20. Frans Eemeren Van (1992)
    Argumentation, communication, and fallacies
  21. Frans Eemeren Van (2004)
    A Systematic theory of argumentation
  22. Frans Eemeren Van (2007)
    Van Eemeren, Frans., and Peter. Houtlosser. 2007. The contextuality of fallacies. Informal Logic 27: 59–67.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  23. JanPeter Laar Van (2008)
    Van Laar, Jan.Peter. 2008. Room for maneuver when raising critical doubt. Philosophy and Rhetoric 41(3): 195–211.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  ↗
  24. Lewis Vaughn (2008)
    The power of critical thinking
  25. TS Vernon (1968)
    Reflective thinking: The fundamentals of logic
  26. Douglas Walton (1996)
    Logic and argumentation
  27. Douglas Walton (1995)
    Commitment in dialogue
CrossRef global citation count: 37 View in citation network → Build reading path →