The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life

Maarten Boudry Ghent University ; Fabio Paglieri Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies ; Massimo Pigliucci City College of New York
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2015-11-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

Cites in this index (14)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Show all 14 →
  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
  6. Argumentation
  7. Argumentation
  8. Argumentation
  9. Argumentation
Also cites 36 works outside this index ↓
  1. Barrett, J.L. 2007. Cognitive science of religion: What is it and why is it? Religious Compass 1(6): 768–786.
    Religious Compass  
  2. From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and argumentation
  3. Boudry, M., and J. De Smedt. 2011. In mysterious ways: On the modus operandi of supernatural beings. Religion…
    Religion  
  4. Boudry, M., S. Blancke, and J. Braeckman. 2010. How not to attack intelligent design creationism: Philosophic…
    Foundations of Science  
  5. Boudry, M., and J. Braeckman. 2011. Immunizing strategies & epistemic defense mechanisms. Philosophia 39(1): …
    Philosophia  
  6. Boudry, M., M. Vlerick, and R.T. McKay. 2015. Can evolution get us off the hook? Evaluating the ecological de…
  7. Cummings, L. 2002. Reasoning under uncertainty: The role of two informal fallacies in an emerging scientific …
    Informal Logic  
  8. Fishman, Y. 2009. Can science test supernatural worldviews? Science & Education 18(6): 813–837.
    Science & Education  
  9. Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty
  10. Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior
  11. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2006. A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies. Synthese 152(2): 207–236.
    Synthese  
  12. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2007. The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning …
    Psychological Review  
  13. Hertwig, R., and G. Gigerenzer. 1999. The conjunction fallacy revisited: How intelligent inferences look like…
    Journal of Behavioral Decision Making  
  14. Jong, J., and A. Visala. 2014. Evolutionary debunking arguments against theism, reconsidered. International J…
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion  
  15. Kahane, G. 2010. Evolutionary debunking arguments. Noûs 45(1): 103–125.
    Noûs  
  16. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
  17. Laudan, L. 1982. Commentary: Science at the bar-causes for concern. Science, Technology and Human Values 7(41…
    Science, Technology and Human Values  
  18. Massey, G.J. 1981. The fallacy behind fallacies. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6(1): 489–500.
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy  
  19. Debating design
  20. Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
  21. Paglieri, F. 2014. Trust, argumentation and technology. Argument and Computation 5(2–3): 119–122.
    Argument and Computation  
  22. Pigliucci, M., and M. Boudry. 2013a. Prove it! The burden of proof game in science vs. pseudoscience disputes…
    Philosophia  
  23. Ritchie, S.J., W. Richard, and C.C. French. 2012. Failing the future: Three unsuccessful attempts to replicat…
    PLoS ONE  
  24. Sterelny, K. 2006. Escaping illusion? American Scientist 94(5): 461–463.
    American Scientist  
  25. Fallacies and argument appraisal
  26. Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem
  27. Critical concepts in argumentation theory
  28. Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis
  29. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
  30. Handbook of argumentation theory
  31. Wagenmakers, E.-J., R. Wetzels, D. Borsboom, and H.L.J. Van Der Maas. 2011. Why psychologists must change the…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  32. Walton, D.N. 2010a. Formalization of the ad hominem argumentation scheme. Journal of Applied Logic 8(1): 1–21…
    Journal of Applied Logic  
  33. Walton, D.N. 2010b. Why fallacies appear to be better arguments than they are. Informal Logic 30(2): 159–184.
    Informal Logic  
  34. Ward, Andrew C. 2010. The value of genetic fallacies. Informal Logic 30(1): 1–33.
    Informal Logic  
  35. Fallacies. Selected papers 1972–1982
  36. The death of argument. Fallacies in agent based reasoning